Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow
I agree and I don't. I think it all depends on season, tree species, lighting and atmosphere how you see the trees.
I remember very well that when the first screeshots of CoD came out my first reaction was: But no, these colours are far too saturated! This looks like plastic. The next time I took the plane I payed special attention to the colours and had to admit to myself that they are not bad in the end.
P.S. On the lower image I don't know about filters but that you can apply to any image that you see on the net - including yours. What I see is that the tone of very many of the trees is overall similar to that of the gras and not or not considerably darker. A few others are darker, others are brighter.
And you may post as many pictures as you want I always can put forward that the optics in this picture are wrong (just as you did wrt my lower picture). Then again I have to remember the sight I had during my plane flight. Do the same and judge.
|
You misunderstood... I meant there is a difference in looking at a 35mm film shot and a digital shot which has been done using a poor gammut... this was not in relation to your presented image
yes, you could say what you will about filters and optics and I could say exactly the same to you and yours... but where is that going to get us?
if you think the bright green trees are accurate, that's for you... but there is image after image that will disagree with you and if you can't discern the difference between the ground and the trees in the shots, then you have something which needs sorting... unfortunately, defective colour vision can't be