View Single Post
  #409  
Old 03-22-2011, 11:19 AM
The Sheepherder The Sheepherder is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
Assuming your processor can also deliver the settings you want to use I would guess the card might be ok at that resolution with much of the eye candy turned off. I don't think 'high detail models and textures' and '1024x768' really go together. Don't be offended but I doubt very much if you'll enjoy the high level of detail graphics CoD can provide if you use such low settings. 1024 x 768 is already, visually, a low level setting in IL-2.

I have my old PC with AMD3800+ 2.4GHz processor, 2Gb RAM and 7800GT 256Mb graphics card (similar generation to the 4650) and it runs IL-2 well at 'Excellent' on 1680x1050 and runs it well at 'Perfect' on 1280x1024. I don't expect it to deliver well on high detail settings in CoD.

But that's only my 2p 'think'. Best thing if you are wondering if its worth buying is wait for someone with a similar set up to report back on it.
Thanks for the feedback. Just thought that if I ran CoD at any resolution higher than 1280 I'll only get a chunk of lag with it. Just wish they'd release a demo for CoD.
Reply With Quote