[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by adonys

In fact, you haven't corrected anything, just made a statement without any support. Which equals bullshit in any common sense interpretation. Actually, you were the one corrected for the wrong use of the "persistent" word. A wrong you don't seem to accept or even understand.

err, if you go back and read through, you'll find you're wrong

Originally Posted by adonys

Yes, I am sure. Why would I be less sure than you when stating that TrackIR has better resolution than Kinect? Where is the data to support that statement?

where did I say that?

Originally Posted by adonys

Let me tell you the actual data, as the person above stated, the resolution is equal, ie 640x40. Raw. Which kinda leads me to another serious thing: Why would NP post a RAW resolution on their site for TIR5 specs? The answer to that is the well known white-painted marketing: make public a true, but not useful, characteristic. Why would someone be interested in TIR5's RAW resolution? I am interested in TIR output/computed resolution, which might even be 32x24 if you ask me, as long as NP doesn't make any statement regarding this.

Does Kinect publish that? and I think you mean 480, not 40

Originally Posted by adonys

So, M$'s Kinectic is using a 320x240 out resolution.. What output resolution is using TIR5? None on NP's site, so, allow me, until NP will make that public, to consider Kinectic's resolution bigger.

and that is important, because _ _ _ _ _ ?

Originally Posted by adonys

Yes, I have considered them. They were embedded into the hardware (manufacture) price of 10-15 euros.

you may have underestimated, but that's not uncommon

Originally Posted by adonys

Retail outlets ask for a bigger % from the selling cost than online sellers, yet most of the NP's sells are made via the online stores, so that can be safely ignored.

agreed... ignore it

Originally Posted by adonys

That is not me making a false connection, but you eating bullexcrements.

same situation, different players and you try to ignore one in favour of the other

Originally Posted by adonys

I was talking about a fair price,

see the above

Originally Posted by adonys

and you said why not complain about videocards, then you turned it into a monopoly complain, which was actually not.

incorrect... I mentioned duopoly

Originally Posted by adonys

that monopoly complain was above.

yours and corrected

Originally Posted by adonys

And just for you to learn, there's no duopoly (which actually is a special case of oligopoly) on the videocard market, you're confusing the production of videocard chipsets with videocards manufacturers. And basic economic knowledge would have told you that an oligopoly is not necessary a bad thing, as long as the players are not following an agreed (price) policy and a correct market competition exists between them.

manufacturers get the chips from which of two major manufacturers?

Originally Posted by adonys

those are classic examples of hardware deprecated. There is a BIG difference bewteen the way an AGp vs PCIx hardware are working. Can you tell me why TIR3 hardware is considered deprecated, and sodiferent thant the hardware from TRI4 or 5 to not be supported anymore?

the equivalents of speed, amount ofdata transfer... perhaps? same as AGP/ PCIx

Originally Posted by adonys

It's obvious you have no common sense and are not a reasonable person to talk with. Even more, your fanaticism is suspect of direct NP influence.

and what has that got to do with the thread?

Originally Posted by adonys

I have nothing more to say or talk to you anymore, please feel free to consider this discussion with you ended and yourself ignored.

If I had a dollar for every time I've heard that..




let me also ask; does the xbox kinnect connect with earlier xboxes?