View Single Post
  #1  
Old 02-22-2011, 09:01 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharveL View Post
I would argue that I do, in fact, understand the "Kinetic-like" solutions better than you likely do. It takes a lot more processing power to figure out tracking points on a face or body than it does for 3 solid dots, and even more still to do so with any accuracy. I'm not saying it isn't possible just that I'm very skeptical for the first generation of these devices to be able to even come close to competing with TIR for the purpose of tracking head movement.

I do think this is the direction we're going though and it will be a good solution. Just not yet.
"Kinetic-like" solutions can traking just 3 dots like our today HT solutions. They use a normal camera that can trace the "3 dots" easily. The WAY they track these dots is that make these kind of solution much more flexible, with the TOF camera. If someone want great response just tracking 3 dots, it's easy to do, it's just a small part of the solution, isn't?

Last edited by LoBiSoMeM; 02-22-2011 at 09:05 PM.
Reply With Quote