Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek
Lobi and albx,
you must be feeling really vulnerable to start calling names again. 
But it would be so easy, if FT wasn't able to use any NP - software, be it a cracked or genuine dll, this whole discussion would have been cut short.
But FT is able to use those dll's, and some users use this shortcut even with the available and usable freetrack.dll.
So, if you would just accept that there are users who use freetrack to infringe on NP software even if its not needed, there might be a understanding. |
NONONONONONONO!
I'm amazed how people don't understand how things work!
Freetrack uses the "NP route" because the GAMES USES THAT ROUTE, NOT FREETRACK ROUTE!
Man, think a minute... We Freetrack users don't want to "hack" the "nothing" of NP. Freetrack neither. But the majority of game devs just provide access to NP inteface ONLY!
Isn't hard to understand that! If games uses FreeTrackClient.dll to use Freetrack inteface, nobody will using Freetrack will use the "NP route". I never will use "NP route" in a geme with suport to Freetrack Interface. Freetrack Interface odes exactly the same thing, by God sake!
If Freetrack don't have NOW the "NP route", I'm now will be flying IL-2 without head tracking! Isn't a "shortcut" for me, it's THE ONLY WAY!!!
If Oleg uses Freetrack Interface, I'll tick Freetrack Interface in Freetrack!
Freetrack ellimination of the "NP route" is easy, NP can achieve it now! You know how?
- Allowing game devs to use either HT solutions and interfaces!
But you believe that NP want's that?!?!?!?!?!?!
Let's begin to think just a little?!?!??!