Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM
Freetrack has the CRAP TIR interface, the old one, because GAME DEVS DON'T USE FREETRACK INTERFACE IN ALL GAMES!
It's clear ENOUGH for you? And I go further: they don't use Freetrack interface, they dont give an OPEN 6DOF HT solution and EVEN CAN'T TALK ABOUT THE SUBJECT because of NP sick trying to keep a marketing that they clearly see will lose, because any decent today CPU and cheap webcam can provide very good HT experience.
NP can close, I don't care! I care about how I spend MY MONEY in a CPU, MY MONEY in a webcam, mount some led assembly and have all the hardware to have 6DOF HT.
But I need that the game devs put suport for the FREE Fretrack interface, that's have NOTHING TO DO WITH TIR INTERFACE into their games!
BIS devs made it! They have the GUTS to do that! If some company can't survive into market without all this FEAR of a small free software, that uses cheap webcams, its a CRAP company, I'm sorry to said.
It's pathetic... And people still talking nonsense about NP products, policies... They sell cheap IR webcams and mediocre software for HT based on IR detection, by God sake! It's TRIVIAL!!!
This community makes me a little sick. In BIS forums the suport for Freetrack was MASSIVE, even with NP trolls... Here, the community is weak, and maybe the sells prediced with IL-2:CoD made the devs trying to make some cash from "other" sources...
I don't give a crap anymore. If Oleg put Freetrack interface suport in IL-2:CoD, will be good. If not, maybe W-R have more "workarounds" to curse, because the Freetrack community is light years away form mediocre NP.
Simple as that! Bye!
|
I support alternatives too, but just chill out already. You're doing more damage than good.
And no, i i don't want NP to close because i have tried both FT and trackIR and for me trackIR was smoother and better. If NP closes i'll be stuck with the alternative solutions, however if NP stays in business and has to compete with the open source/free trackers, it's better for everyone: you can use FT with native support, i can use NP because either they will make an even better trackIR or they will start selling cheaper to stay in business..
Sorry mate, but sometimes your one-dimensional arguments are just as bad as those used by the people you are screaming against.
On the other hand, W-R you are dragging this poll the way of the other thread. Please stick to debating how it works there, where we all tried multiple times to explain to you how it works and yet you either refuse to understand or we're having some massive communication breakdown along the way...see my latest post in the other thread where i try to explain it in layman's terms by comparing apples and bananas (yes, it's come to using such simplistic examples because we're apparently having a massive communication issue).
If you want a short explanation, it's this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by julian265
Windows game controller axes do not need any NP software to interface with. Allowing anyone to control head axes with any game controller is absolutely not a hack, and absolutely not sponging of anyone's copyright or hard work:
1. Head control in games is under no-ones copyright (ie mouse/POV hat/whatever device moving the in-game head).
2. The method that windows game controllers use to interface with games is a Microsoft thing, nothing to do with NP.
I suppose you'll now tell me that the sky is red?
|