Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider
the part of the quote addressed... and yes, thank you for that full quote.
|
which I linked on page 14:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider
The question still remains though... was the (to be clearer) "vendor independant" SDK, developed purely by DCS without reference to or use of NP's SDK?
|
Post 193:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by julian265
The statement gets "trundled out" because it's clear enough. The likelihood that ED's SDK would have had anything to do with NP's software is extremely low, for two reasons:
- It would have been illegal, and TIR probably would have been patched to no longer work with ED products (fair enough).
- There was no reason to the steal code to perform such a simple task.
Either way, ED did the right thing and exposed A-10C's head control axes for assignment (which I think is all that is needed). Whether they did for BS or not, I can't remember.
|
If you disagree with my assessment of the likelihood of ED using NP software without permission, please explain why.