guys, not all units are supposed to be equally useful. That just the way the game is and that just the way all other games are. thats like saying all items in the game should be equally as good. its not designed to work that way either. would the game really be possible to beat if all units were just as good. If for example bears could teleport anywhere on the battlefield, you would be murdered. Most enemy stacks that you face are well over twice your leadership and i really dont think i could go through the game fighting an army of black dragons that has twice my leadership. i dont think any of you would either. why do you think you get certain units later on in the game? Why do you also think that you get bears, hyenas, peasants, ect early on in the game? bears have great health, great defense, and have great damage when they get attacked, they just have shitty movement. if you went head to head with them you would lose, we just use strategy to beat them. thats what this comes down to. Dragonflies are terrible units when it comes down to it but if you equip a couple items that gives 1+ poisen/fire damage, they do INCREDIBLE damage, have good movement, and good initiative which will allow them to attack first. It all boils down to one thing, strategy. Anyone here who has played the game and knows the ins and outs should be able to win flawlessly with almost any unit stacks (like i said some do just plain suck). Im sure when you first played KB:TL you thought bears were gods when you first got them at that little animal place in debir because of how much damage they could soak up and because of how damage they could dish out compared to all the other units in that area. I wont lie, thier movement makes them blow ass but they sure as hell can soak up a lot of damage and send it right back the enemies way. I dont want every unit to be equal. Some are just better and that the way it should stay.
|