Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest
Wolf_Rider continues:
~ Your repeated suggestions that I am breaking forum rules ~
|
err, you're off the ledge on this one andyjwest... I have never said that
I will request that this topic be closed, and that appropriate action be taken against you. How the moderators react is of course up to them, but I'd think it difficult for them to allow your dishonest tactics to continue.
You are free to do as you wish, andyjwest, but as with your calling for people to be ignored, the above also says more about you than anyone else. As for your claim of dishonest tactics... well, I can only say you are looking at yourself in your mirror there. "If you can't play them, badger them... if you can't badger them, do all you can to shut them down, eh? That's what you seem to be employing here, andyjwest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKA_Tenn
basically... to use an analogy... to say freetrack is illegal is like saying... because one company makes TV's all other companies need to ask that one for permission if they want to make TV's too... or if one company makes fly swatters, any other company that makes something that also kills flies needs to as for permission...
yes... t hats right i used TV's and flyswatters as analogys...
|
I don't believe anyone has said FT is actually illegal... they have said though, that FT is infringing another company's copyright. Also said was; why couldn't FT come up with their own necessary bits, approach the developers for inclusion in the production, whilst leave NP's property alone?
Your TV analogy is spot on for describing how copyright and patents work. Does "manufactured under license" or "used under license", ring any bells?
?