Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   King`s Bounty: Warriors of the North (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=206)
-   -   Snipers Endgame? (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=36010)

sjeromy78 11-16-2012 03:20 AM

Snipers Endgame?
 
Currently running Snipers with pally and triple stack of rune mages (phantom pallys for 2nd wind). So with precision, firebreathing and a bless, they're shooting 5 times 1st turn...for huge damage.

Any other ranged tricks out there, or even a better unit to do it with?

gempepaine 11-16-2012 03:46 AM

Ale barrel + telescopic sight

namad 11-16-2012 03:52 AM

snipers what are snipers?


i know of bowmen? rangers? and elves? what's a "sniper" ? which race is it? maybe i just haven't had any spawn in my game?

gunnyhighway 11-16-2012 04:28 AM

Ghost Recon : Warriors of the North

sjeromy78 11-16-2012 05:53 AM

*Rangers
Mistype, sniper is just one of their skills

namad 11-16-2012 05:59 AM

rangers do have fairly fabulous damage potential, does any ranged unit in the game do more ranged damage to a non-animal, non-undead, non-demon enemy unit? or do any ranged units deal base pure fire damage? (which would maybe allow better synergy with greasy mist?)


then again have you tried adding in greasey mist on targets? to combine with hellbreathe on rangers? it might be powerful?

Razorflame 11-16-2012 08:56 AM

cyclopses have sniper ability too;)

namad 11-16-2012 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razorflame (Post 481617)
cyclopses have sniper ability too;)

I am fairly sure cyclops have a lot lower damage than rangers taking into account well... just having tested both compared to each other. Cyclops were a bit tankier than rangers but less good at offensive ranged damage by far.

Xargon 11-16-2012 09:49 AM

Breaking news: combining any decent unit with overpowered phantoming runemages (or runemages + paladins' second wind) will result in profit and probably less fun after a few battles.

Razorflame 11-16-2012 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by namad (Post 481622)
I am fairly sure cyclops have a lot lower damage than rangers taking into account well... just having tested both compared to each other. Cyclops were a bit tankier than rangers but less good at offensive ranged damage by far.

well personally i rather have more tankier units

and high ini units;)

low hp is tedious with ressing and stuff


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.