wow i lasted 3 years in the last science forum, now im banned from all for insanity
 

i talked to much of the sky dome

but the things is that with forums i learnt to tell whats wacky from whats not

i think that now even with my great delusion i could pass the shrink test to become astronaut knowing so well what others think crazy after all this year telling wacky stuff and standing the answers

isnt that an scarry thought from a clinical point of view im sane, oh thats insulting

hopefully that'll learn ya, but I somehow doubt it :rolleyes:;)

oh i find complimenting they ban me based on my believes not my beahviour

the forum member who asked for my ban asked it in basis of their own sanity thinking my madness contagious

so flaterring and so sissy for a thinker as you would expect in an science forum

down with the mind, ratio is death long life to the irrational heart

Maybe you should seek help if you're questioning your own sanity, but I assure you these forums can only do more damage. Best of luck with finding a new science forum.

my personal opinion? Cut the crap man, get out, don't use the internet for some time, that can only do you good.

oh but i like to be crazy, i enjoy every single second of my madness

and just before i was wondering:

when do i deny reality more when i believe thinks are what they seem when i have EVIDENCES to the contrary which i chose to ignore or when i see through them

personally i dont like either to be too crazy but again i want to be slightly crazy

its my choice my right i cant be judged according my believes however wacky but by my behaviour

some people have known me for 10 years they know im totally nuts but i fit socially exmplarily

then whats the problem

to my eyes i bet that 100 years ago newspaper said the crime was commited by an homosexual as today its said the crime was comiited by an schizo

the eternal withchunt of the different one

In short..............just cut the crap,not just for you're sanity but for ours too!

yeah i understand that certain subversives ideas like madness is not a disease but a trait of personality should be silenced, even today homosexuallity is considered that way

now you can discuss if you should render blood in the screen or not

yeah i may cut the crap and just hang around in the rof forum, peoples nicer there and not just rude

really wonder why

i wonder why i could post i like to simulate killing people playing fps, with other words, but i cant say madness its a personality trait not a disease

isnt this the pilot lounge to talk with friends? i have more friends than enemies here

Raaaid, madness is good,
do you know a saying by Charlie Bukowski:
"some people never go crazy, what truly horrible lives they must lead..."
;)

experiencing madness and craziness just means you're alive and kicking.

You've always struck me as being a nice person Raaaid, and a gentle soul. I don't think I've ever seen you be nasty or rude to anyone, on any forum (Ubi etc....read a lot of your posts there). Your posts, though invariably perplexing, and mostly "off the wall" are often fun to read. :)

People who don't like them, don't have to read them. Not sure what the problem is really.

Last time I checked, its not a crime to be different, or march to the beat of a 'different drum' lol. :)

Just be yourself, and carry on. You're alright man. :)

i think the same some have homophobia others seem to have wackophobia casue i tried to reduce the amount of my threads and didnt work the problem seems the content

i love forums because its the only place i can speak my mind, i think youll undersatnd

for the record i tell all this to my psichitraist and apparently the reason im "clinically"sane is my uncertainty

while most ultrarational people is actually deluded by their ABSOLUTE CONVINCTION that invariably if ever expose to the contrsary crumble like a cards castle

You seem to have ABSOLUTE CONVICTION in what you say.......does that mean you are the same as the ultrarational people who oppose you?

oh no youre wrong i learnt to live by probailities

i give a 1% probaility the universe has a good nature and therefrore the world can only be staged and a 99% probaility the universe is horrible and the news are totally real

although i admitt i tend to entertain more the more beautifull thought but doesnt mean im CONVINCED of it

you can tell this by the way i express things, i try to behave in life ffrom the best probabilistic way

notice i dont tell you you know me and you are acting though i ponder it

for example in the truman show movie would you label truman as an schizo? well it depends on his CONVICTION

Why am I wrong? you sound very convinced of that.

But isn't that a human concept though? If I blew up the world, there would be no good or bad. No-one left alive to judge so it wouldn't be a crime. The universe would just be the universe.

Like your posts man, just playing Devils advocate on this one :)

Is this the irrational fear of Whacko-Jacko, AKA Micheal Jackson? :-P

Or is it the fear of mas.............. Whacking?

yes well im almost convinced, not convinced since you could be acting but quite convinced since you said a thing I KNOW its wrong

the only thing i condone myself to be sure of its the love of my family

thats the only axiom i take which in case to be wrong i would crumble, other way nothing will take me by surprise

the more axioms you take the easire to go insane when you discover all your world was wrong

so are you crazy cause your wrong, which you never know or by your degree of CONVICTION?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VeIxgZ8mDI

oh yes but we are part of the universe

what sense does it make believe in the good nature of the universe and at the same time believe babies die from starvation in front of their moms

a patently false thought doesnt depend on its bizarreness but wetaher its solid or contradictory

Do you know how to make simple answers? without bizarre links and concepts.

are you being sponsored by websites and youtube to generate hits on content?

well the video was reñevant to the point and the psichiatrist face seeing what he took as deluded truth becoming himself deluded well...

you know if i ever get to marry ill be as honest as i am in the forums

i wouldnt like to build my life on lies and pretending as i have to in real life, having to behave as all with hipocresy and not being able to tell what i really think not to be outcast

after all if you pretend is because you know you wont be loved as for what you are, i dont need that

but well to find this girl i give it less chance than the staged world theory yeat aint zero ;)

You know, I've always believed that a person can't be completely happy, unless they're completely insane.

Evanescence just did an Aussie tour last month.

No idea if they played that Sarah Connor song.

They are better known these days for Twilight.

+ 1

It's always fun trying to understand what you really say, and just like Orville I've never seen you being rude to anyone - keep it coming here in the lounge and I'm all in :) I don't know if you would have been sent home from Italy in 1943 or not, but I sure can picture you discussing with Yossarian under an olive tree ;)

/mazex

+1 too, but Raaid, some punctuation and capital letters wouldn't go amiss ;)

oh i tried to post with good grammar but that cuts my stream of counciousness

i find my posts more artistic if i let them flow, then you can write good instead of god without realizing

Buddy, the universe isn't good - there are black holes which suck in whole galaxies an strip everything in it down to atomic levels. In short: the universe doesn't give a sh1t about anything in it.

Then again, there is no good or bad either, it all lies in the eye of the beholder.
Humans for instance aren't born "good", they turn in what you call good due to education and inputs from their environment - change a few things and they will behave just like... spiders f.i., eat the partner after mating.

Regarding your starving babies, nature sometimes goes cruel ways - yet, in the end it's usually right.

"I don't know if you would have been sent home from Italy in 1943 "


if this guy went to war i would go to war:

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/001...er_xlarge.jpeg

horny?

Hello Raaaid,
May I ask what were you discussing about in the science forum that made them get you banished?
I mean, it sounds pretty much senseless that, as you said, their reason was your assumed contagious insanity...
Kind regards.

ok maybe thats a good idea i think i might try it from now on and see what happens perhaps i will find a new and higher plane of counsciousness or maybe ill just lose the plot and forget what im on about who knows but anything is worth a try once apart from of course drowning and other horrible things like that but i reckon you know what i mean yeah this is good the stuff is just flowing now

I don't get your reasons for being so poorly sarcastic at him, though.
Is there any need to be?

well i was presenting this invention:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ1cL...ure=plpp_video

i think first they dint like the wacky pendulum name but what got them real mad was my point that science is based on measure, but personal measure not others measures unless youre gullible

so i with held the position that my claim of earth having 600 km radius was a stronger position than theirs since i measured and they trust gullibly

oh i laughed he is being funny not sarcastic imho

Indeed I was Raaid. Was just pulling your leg - something tickled me and I had to post it! Pleased you got my humour ;)

ive been 10 years posting, 10 thousands of posts, i understand what you mean by that tickle

have you wonder in what way would be the wolrd different if you never posted, how many lives took a different course just for a slight smile?

we all shape the future but posting ideas on the net i have the intuition that shapes the future in such degree, we all do

myslef thats why im an antitroll, thats is a troll which intends good emotions instead of bad ones

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pM9zzI0uoM8

So we live on "Charon"?

it's amazing google 'radius of earth is 600 km' and the third hit is to raaaids ramblings on the science forum he is banned from..

http://www.thescienceforum.com/pseud...hemsleves.html

this proves the kind of trolling you are into, nothing to do with making people feel happy, you just want to dump yourself amongst the most rational people you can find and mess with their heads.

imo real cientist think of the impossible, ideas that dont seem right in the "general concent" of their time . so im sure your more of a cientist that any of the people on that forum :P , and you know haters gonna hate

ill ot a little,
i think a lot about happines and how people search it, im now reallyconvinced that happines dosnt exist, it is an idea that was invented by some past culture to make people work , make money, have children or watever, so they think they are doing it for something.

i sometimes imagine how was life in ancient times , and im sure the abstract concept of happines or depresion doesnt exist, i imagine as a state of suffering or not suffering more like animals, more driven by phisical pain or hunger than emotional issues
im sure that in those times there were not suicides and crimes for "monetary ambition"


the most close thing to happines i think of is the idea that happines dosent exist so it dosent deserve the effort to search for it, maybe if we all think like this we can live less stresfull lives , and be able to apreciatte the present a little more, its not wonderful but surely its most real than happines imo .

people , or at least the ones i know seems to always be rushing for some future idea, they dont really seem to enjoy the road very much. the worst of it is that generallly that idea is not their own idea, its the idea that some other people put in their minds, an awful fail of the education imo, they dont teach people to think for themselves and reach their conclussions, they are more inclined to accept an idea by "faith" more or less and follow it.
i think that if people are more open to analize the generals ideas and measure and deconstruct them by themselves they could manage a lot better all this issues, they seem to accept a lot of things just becouse they told them they are that way.
i needed to do some catarsis, im your *3 fan raid!! and you seem more sane than a lot of people, madness and sannes (?) are artificial ideas too

My response to you from an old music...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyMPXV5CLNs

so you see what i referred to before?

some people is afraid of madness being contagious, from there the wackophobia

you reflected this by your comment "mess with their heads"

tell me honestly what do you think messes up more a head?

your exposition to my brand new idea that good is good and therefore the world can only be staged and media a bunch of lifes, THE UNIVERSE I SPERFECT

or your having virtully kill(murder according the console) maybe millions by now

edit:

yeah near miss i was overdoing it in that forum lately, you hit right on spot

there were like 3 or 4 guys who were opressing me trying to prove how stupid i was and turning my threads into thousands hits

what they dint know is that i love a good fight in the morning so i really was enjoying myself asking questions they couldnt answer and exposing rationality as wrong for its inherent conviction of appearance being reality:)

edit:

lyssophobia
lyssiophobia, lyssophobia, lissophobia 1. An intense terror of becoming mad, insane, or of having a nervous breakdown.

actually i have that, thats why i built a solid world with thick columns of uncertainty

imagine youre ultrarational and one day you see a ghost, most likely your reality would crumble and you would have a nervous breakdown

i had two just like erich hartman, and looking past the reason was not other that my absolute conviction, of rationality in one case and of irationality in the other

they did themselves a thin favour banning me from there

i speak wiuth the heart as it comes to my mind with the best intentions

if thats not wellcome there its not very difficult to see their problem

i have no doubt im agood influence and however crazy which i admit i can dialogue

So did Breivik.
Reckon something?

and so did gandhi so waht

maybe its bad for you to have good intentions and speak without hipocrisy

and whos closer to that mass murderer who is actually not crazy bad a very bad person

you a declared misantropos or a guy whos proved over 10 yueasr to be totally harmless

you may even think hitler was crazy

you seem to confuse badness with crazyness

im proud to be crazy if i was a bad person i would feel ashame and not tell my mind

edit:

i found that comment annoying so ill play your game

what do you think a shrink would think of you if you told him you would run with a tank over non violent protester if you were told to

you see in just 3 months i caught how crazy you are in a bad sense

people in 10 years can only tell from me im definitly crazy in the good way but morally my mind works as silk, all who know me know that

that unfortunate comment from yours prove morally your nuts, sorry

edit:

ive seen lowest tide with my own eyes with the moon on the top:

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/l...pring-neap.jpg

ive seen exactly at half moon sun and moon 60º apart when they should be 90º

i measured earth radius to be 600 km

ive seen i girl got to cry when i thought she was soooo ugly

ive seen thousands of people yelled like mad when they appeared live on tv when they had no way of knowing the go live

ive told the post man my id:

942 and he responded 9425

how did he know?

saw an ufo once next day peed 40 times and my ability to see with peripheral view as with central dissapeared

watch arthur c clarck admitting paedophilia on tv, yes the "lost" daily mirror video

i think always positive cause my thoughts will very often appear on the media

people look too much at me or too few

i think the only conclusion i can reach pretty much for sure is that things are not what they appear to be

It is of course, quite possible that things actually are just what they appear to be: however, someone (aliens ?) is manufacturing all these odd occurrences purely to trick you into thinking reality is an illusion.

Buddhist of course believe reality is an illusion/delusion. Interestingly they also claim that just because its an illusion does not make it any less real :D

+1

Pretty much my thoughts.

Do you know what it means to know something?

That sentence is one of the most delightful statements I have ever encountered on the internet. Bravo.

So nice to see that medieval prejudices such as this are still alive and well.

Honestly I think I shall go mad if I read much more of this mindless drivel posted by Raaaid. We don't care much for the "stream of consciousness," I, for one, would much prefer it if you demonstrated the basis of your understanding of the concept through a demonstration of an acceptance of intellectual structure, grammar and spelling.

ROFL..........You'll have to explain this one to his Lordship :lol:

True, that guy should have asked for castration - at least we could be sure raaid will never reproduce.
The alternative, post-natal abortion seems a bit a harsh(and outdated), even for me.
;)

be very afraid my spematozoids can fly

this mutation come alongs with wackyness

and 3d vision.

Then again, maybe you're a plant.

honestly i got to quite a degree of grandieur delusion

but no wonder i was brainwashed to it

i think that whats going on with my 3d vision is more the 2012 effect

so i bet there are many experiencing what i do

No doubt!
Only, they are not allowed walk around freely.

Lol, Raaaid. I'm quite sure your insane, but I think that you are becoming somewhat more lucid now that you have gotten away from all those people who think their edumacated.

Good luck, mate. It's difficult to strike that perfect balance between rationality and truly liberated thought.

from the other topic:

the way ours and animals depth perception work is by triangulation

thats very different to the AUGMENTED reality from nintendo 3ds for example

this varying depth stereogram may make you understand:

http://smallbasic.com/smallbasic.com/program/?MHH970

the thing is that im in a position to say my (our) perception is flawed since i managed to have an augemented depth perception some times in my life for seconds

i think that if i learn to keep that augmented perception, i know how to do it but its so difficult, ill have a four dimensional percpetion and achieve enlightenement

i think the philosphers stone which im after is nto other thing but an eye exercise to achieve binaurality, enlightenement, four dimensional perception

thats what i do to fight famine in the world

Am I getting this right.....you are going crosseyed to teach yourself to hear in stereo so you can end world famine?

+2

raaaid....is different. But he most certainly is not an a**hole. And in my book, that is all what matters.

Keep it up raaaid, for some reasons your postings always put me in a good mood :D

nope you got it wrong im after the philosphers stone to make it public for all

Oh...you are on a quest for a ficticious stone from a well known work of fictional litterature....to end world famine?

fulcanelli, nicolas flamel, hermes trismegisto are not fictional, they found the stone

If they found it why are you still looking for it?

they kept it secret for some reaon, maybe they found the worlds perfect and theres nothing to change, maybe they were selfish

nazis got lot of interest on alchemist manuscripts

there are 3 levels of stone:

powder of projection which turns led or mercury to gold, this is useless

elixir of youth, this is useless

the trick to achieve enlightenement, this is hot and what im afetr

what do you think 'enlightenment' is?

who knows maybe something in this vein:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyTxCsIXE4

i know you think im crazy, even myself i think im crazy

but when i was 33, 4 years ago i was so close to enlightenment:

i could see for periods of five seconds with my peripheral view as with central and had that augmented depth perception

then one night saw an ufo aproaching me, disappeared right above me and next day peed like 40 or 50 times and never after saw again with my peripheral view as with central as those times

edit:

i see earth as a prison in which my perception is dumbed down to the minimum i can live with, in a way im trying to break free

A childs cartoon? and one with a no more philosophical mesasage than 'think outside the box'?

does that mean everybody in a corporate boardroom enviroment are 'enlightened'?

aren't we all on a path to enightenment anyway? I hope you don't go through life chasing something that doesn't exist and finally realising you should have accepted and enjoyed what you already knew.

Good luck though!

the approach im following for the stone is all based on depth perception

again we dont have a real stereo perception as 3D AUGMENTED REALITY but we triangulate with the eyes

in my research theres something that blows my mind and shows how space aint what it seems to be

if you go crossed eyed while looking at long line that goes quite far away you should see it like this II But you see it like this V

im learning of instead of overimposing both eye images with the eyes, triangulation, overimposing them with the brain, stereopsis

that program was designed to train stereopsis farther

the trick to have an augmented 3d perception is to look very slightly double so your brain does the overimposition

but since the near triad works in sync this means your eye lens goes out of focus so you dont have 3d yet, it works just an stereogram, that untill the image is focused you dont see 3d

im training the near triad to break the sync so i can see slightly double and in focus and like this you can have augmented 3d perception since its my brain which is overimposing the images and from the differences of these building depth

so if you can have an idea of what 3d is like by a 2d represantation having an authentic depth perception you can visualize the fourthD

angels imho are four dimensional beings

theyre all around staging the world, if we could see real depth we could see them as we can see by this means whats invisible in an streogram

taildragger, I really like your communication skills. ;)

PS:
Have you ever been checked for lead poisoning(plumbism)?

What is your idea of what the 4th dimension is?

Isn't the forth dimension time? :confused:

i have no clue but according phisics there it is

What does Physics say it is?

One day raaid I'm expecting you to say something so profound the universe ends..

Until then..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLKiMbC6s2k

Raaid, have you considered submitting your ideas to the BBC, they would make awesome scripts for the Dr Who television series.

for example the universe is defined as a four dimensional manifold

i laughed a lot about this in the science forum and compared it with the emeperors new clothes

who could understand this

Among other things there must be more than three for string theory to work.

The math requires more than 3 dimensions.

If you are not fluent in scientific math-speak you cannot expect to understand the science. The most you will be able to do is watch Discovery channel documentaries where journalists present pretty animated demonstrations of the science which if you are lucky get it maybe half right in a quaint Discovery channel sort of way.

In science given a choice between commonsense and believing the mathematical formalism you must always believe the math no matter how weird the result.

Wiki says a manifold is a math abstraction that models a point to a local neighborhood to the nth. So,

one dimensional manifold –> point relative to a line or circle

two dimensional manifold –> point relative to a plane or sphere

three dimensional manifold –> point relative to a cube

fourth dimensional manifold –>point relative to space-time

The last one being the famous space-time continuum. This can be confirmed by watching lots of Star Trek.;)

Going to nth, all day long we can do

Fifth dimensional manifold –> point relative to space-time-thought

Sixth dimensional manifold –> point relative to space-time-thought-RAAAID :-P

Sevnth dimensional manifold –> point relative to space-time-thought-RAAAID-etc...

Then there’s the anti-matter piece. So, I suppose, if assuming that a “point” has mass only in the third dimension (i.e., 3d space at a particle level), you could then do an “inverse” manifold starting at the third dimension. So,

Third anti-dimensional manifold –> an anti-matter cube.

But I’m not really sure how the math guys figure in the matter verses anti-matter. I suppose the anti-matter piece could be part of the same set of infinity instead of a separate “anti-matter” set of infinity. But then again, infinity is probably infinity. So they probably just use one set of infinity to include both the anti-matter piece and the matter piece. So, instead of starting all over again from 1 to n, they probably just slap it in the set of n somewhere. So you could just stick an “anti” in front of it. So where 1<x<n, you would have something like

n-x anti-dimensional manifold –> anti-space-anti-time-anti-thought-anti-RAAAID (oops!):o

And somehow CloD fits in nearby where you got your anti-spitfires that climb like 109’s and your anti-109s that climb like spitfires and CloD works like a charm on 32-bit XP and STEAM is dead as a door knob.:grin:

So your little cartoon was meant to inspire us to think outside the box and contemplate a 4th dimension, apparently because everybody think s you are crazy for thinking about a 4th dimension, yet science already has a theory on a 4th dimension and is in fact a familiar concept to most of us, but you are going to solve the mysteries of the 4th dimension by going crosseyed alot in your bedroom?

well we know theres a 4th dimension but we dont have a perception of it

im TRYING to get the perception of it

edit:

the problem, your normal:

you dont see auras as me , i know theres something spiritual, i have proof of it by seeing auras

youre a bad observer:

if you were a good observer like me you would have noticed that 3d movies is an AUGMENTED REALITY you dont see like that in real life

put a pencil in your nose and look at it

do you see it like in a 3d movie?

nope you see an X

if you dont even notice your perception in a 3d movie is different to real life

dont you think you have some face by calling me crazy or stupid for noticing?

do you really think im the only one doing almost imposible things like cutting flying flys in half with a blade or knowing what kind of thought you have by your aura? or slowing time as to be able to scratch brand new polished tin with my nail or get a 30 kill per one death playing counterstrike online...

check this out and yeah delude yourself thinking its photoshopped

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwkLNLUBcWc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKxaP...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NqpvHtARrM

you see you ignore this litle details into the construction of your reality

I DONT if you really think youll find out THE LIE IS HUGE and people is too gullible

By going crosseyed?

not exactly

see my current objective is get a perception as in an AUGMENTED reality 3d movie

i have had this perception like 10-20 times in my life but never longer than 20 seconds

ive been observing it:

first let me explain you that to have a 3d AUGMENTED perception is not your eyes which are overimposing the images from each eye BUT THE BRAIN

you can tell this from this / and this \ are not optically overimposable but your brain does building from those a I with augmented depth perception

so the trick to see in augmented stereo is to see slightly double, just enough as that your brain works out overimposing both images

im anxious to go back to the coast to go on with my exercise

i went some brief days and did some exercise and took off my glasses

in a stroll on the beach i was able to control my depth perception

i could see flat or i could see more ore less in augmented 3d and what i did was cross my eyes without seeing double

the dificulty of this is the synchronicity of the near triad(eye lens, iris opening, parallax) by which when you cross your eyes howeve sligghly you get unfocused from far

i think the key for this is device an eye exercise intended to gain asincronous control of the near triad

just like learning to move your ears and not your eyebrows

edit:

the scarry thought is that if i fail im just another wacko and if i succed weell

once right after my 2nd nervous breakdown after having watched in tv late at night arthur c clarcke admitng paedophilia and how chicken meat was treated so from millions of genetic pairs in proteins there were just two i got to a chat and a gay named magico read my mind and told me i was l*****r

well for sanitys sake i belive he was a hacker but thats whats happened

http://image.spreadshirt.com/image-s...rts_design.png

if you rather

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Burkhoff

Everything you are saying is true but how do you think this has any relationship to the 4th dimension? all you seem to be doing is exploring some of the less understood behaviours of the human body but there is no obvious link to the 4th dimension, what makes you think there is one?

When I say everything you say is true I would rephrase it to some of it is true, there is quite alot of weird dribble too.

because if i can SEE the 3rd dimension in flat if i have a real understanding and REAL PERCEPTION of the third then i can understand and visulaize the 4th whatever that means as i can visulaize 3d in 2d

nahh to be honest i dont give a damm about famine, well i do but is not my motif

i fell once in love with a girl and visualize this as my chance thats why being my intentions good good may give it to me :)

2D is 2D, the illusions you see using superimposed 2D images as 3D are just that....illusions, it's not real 3D, you are just using a simple trick to give an illusion of depth.
Depth is 'real', it is the 3D world we live in, you can stare at all the 3D illusions you want but the 2D images they are created from will never have 'real' depth, you already have all the tools to perceive 'real' depth yet you choose to try to find it in illusions or tricks.

you say famine is not your motive.......why did you mention it at all?

not sure what you mean here, your near perfect english always degrades just at the point you put in weird statements.

this is a visulaization of 3d in 2d:

http://www.teknoplof.com/wp-content/...10/03/cubo.jpg

now if i can have an an augmented 3d perception i could visulaize 4d in 3d

that was a poetic coment on the fact that being love what moves me i feel kind of unstopable and thats dangerous for the powers to be since i want to discover a simple way anybody could do to go 4th dimensional, an utter evolution of the status quo in whcih everybody can scan evrybodys minds:rolleyes:

edit:

i ment revolution you see thats why i dont correct, see my plan is to become that crazy scientific who disocvers promicine in the 4400 show

edit:

wacko mode on

you see i really know whats this all about humanity is on the next stage of evolution

but it can randomly follow to paths

the transhuman borg who can live millions of years and passes his finals days in a virtual reality

or a natural humanity who lives just 100 naturally in a next natural stage of evolution

the problem is that if you left this for democracy which do you think would turn out?

(wacko mode off)

this is a random wild speculation but i think there are two ways to achieve an enhanced 3d perception, naturally or artificially

Yes thats just a 2D picture representing a cube (a 3D object) just like a photograph is a 2D image of a 3D world, there is no real depth, simply our natural sympathy for a 3D enviroment lets us imagine the 3D.

Heres a 2D representation of 4D, why aren't you staring at these pictures instead?

http://www.math.harvard.edu/archive/...ube/4dcube.gif


Everybody loves something, it doesn't make you unique, it seems to me there are some already brilliant minds working on understanding the 4th dimension with much more sophisticated means rather than going cross eyed trying to understand 3D and watching cartoons and cancelled sci-fi programmes, why would we want a world where everybody can scan each others minds?

isn't that a good example of why you 'should' correct? saying something you don't mean.

No such thing as enhanced 3D perception in the 'real' world, all you are playing with is stereoscopy which is simply making 3D illusions out of 2D images, meanwhile the rest of us in the real world are more than aware of 3D perception with real depth, I can stand at a cliff edge and see its a long way down.....better not jump.

here 4d represented in flat if you know how to look so what could you do if you had AUGMENTED 3D perception

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...00412-1437.jpg

There is nothing augmentative about being cross eyed, that picture is a 2D image of 2 pencils on a piece of stained paper, the image I linked to is genuinely a representation of current perceptions of 4D.

I applaud your efforts Raaaid.

However, since i'm only interested in your success, I advise you to only come back here when you have succeeded and stop wasting valuable time here, whilst you could be using that very same time to achieve your goal.

I prefer touching double Ds over visualizing 4D in 3D.. Your mileage may and clearly does vary

+1

Evolution?
The evolution of man is as follows:

-We get taller, due to our nutritious food
-our skulls will be narrower, due to the above
-our eyesight will most likely get worse, as this part doenst change the same speed our bones do.
-we lose teeth and hair, as we have no need for them to survive

Now, what the heck makes you think our eyes evolve, although we dont need eagle eyes for survival?
You're almost blind, yet live and post here happily on a daily basis.
Did it ever occur to you, that you might be the living proof something like de-volution exists as well?

There is no "de-evolution", just a constant process of adapting to the requirements for you to reproduce effectivly. If eye sight gets worse, then that simply is a marker for lesser requirements in eyesight in our modern world. On the other hand I expect some adjustments for sitting in offices 8 hours a day in the long run, instead of running through the woods catching prey.

Btw, if men will lose its hair has still to be seen. Recent studies suggest men has still hair for the very banal reason that it makes life harder for bugs, mosquitos and other leeches having a go at you. Else we already would have lost it.
I dare say even the most rich and sophisticated/intelligent people on this planet will be thankful to keep it for bit longer unless they want to eridacte all insect life.

http://mesikammen.files.wordpress.co.../idiocracy.jpg

the knife of evolution cuts both ways! ;)

Evolution? What's that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1TWyR8cpsc

Devolution does as a noun does exist.
Devolution, de-evolution, or backward evolution is the notion that a species can change into a more "primitive" form.


Like what, most ppls eyesight in front PC get worse after onyl a few years.



Nice theory, doesnt work tho.
A lot of parasites and bacteria rely on hair being present to survive. Ticks on the other hand dont care if there is hair or not.
(I only have hair on my head an legs, everything else is shaved, first thing you will notice is you'll need a lot less deo...)

What's left? The mosquitos.
I think my hair on arms and legs didnt change much over the past 10 years, yet, at some point the flies virtually stopped bitting me. Maybe they dont like my "nutritious" blood - their offspring probably would die instantly if exposed to it, lol.
On the other hand there are the blacks who suffer a lot under mosquitoes in Africa in other regions of the world. Take a close look at their hair, specially on arms and legs and explain how they can keep away those tiny buggers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMkrJOOTjj4
the first 5 min have the truth about the future of human evolution :)

ROFLMAO!:grin:

No crossing of eyes is necessary to percieve the 4th dimension Raaaid. Some tests for you. First, you must turn off your augmentation ability or these may not work!

1) Now go look at an object. Say, a rock. Close your eyes. Say “one-one thousand” to yourself. Now open them and look at the rock again. One second of time has just been mapped by your brain relative to that object and your 3 dimensional perception of it. Do you see the rock? Did you see the time pass by? You did! You have a record of it in your short term memory. All you have to do is remember it. You can re-live it over and over as many times as you like until you decide to forget it.

2) Look at a polaroid picture of yourself taken sometime in the past. Now go look at yourself in the mirror. These representations are 2D, more or less. Now, try to remember everything you did from the time the picture was taken to the time you looked in the mirror. Your brain just mapped the 4th dimension relative to those two 2D planes!

This augmentation must be something other than perception of 4th dimension. Maybe a mutation on how we perceive space-time. More or less efficient? :confused: Have no idea.

lol, i almost spilled my coffee. http://www.cheesebuerger.de/images/s...hlich/g035.gif