Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   Few images from the upcoming update 4.14 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=230149)

daidalos.team 03-27-2018 12:13 PM

Few images from the upcoming update 4.14
 
MBR-2 flyable + wheel/ skis versions

New cockpit
https://s25.postimg.cc/ez2tg6yof/0_1...0c813_X4_L.jpg
https://s25.postimg.cc/uwjlni827/0_1...a0a555_XXL.jpg
https://s25.postimg.cc/3lyafkxfj/0_1...a1701d_XXL.jpg
https://s25.postimg.cc/75k85enan/0_1...03ce50_XXL.jpg

Updated external model
https://s25.postimg.cc/641z5ohlr/grab0293.jpg
https://s25.postimg.cc/lcrwjgizz/grab0289.jpg
https://s25.postimg.cc/nhc9kjscf/grab0285.jpg
https://s25.postimg.cc/chr28y9n3/1distr.jpg

New default skins
https://s25.postimg.cc/5ddud8jxb/0_1...32bda9_XXL.jpg
https://s25.postimg.cc/jwyebx4sf/0_1...85c463_XXL.jpg

Verdun1916 03-27-2018 05:16 PM

Beautiful work, guys!

I'm really looking forward to flying this bird!:grin:


Thanks for the update on the progress of the update, guys!!! ;)

=UAb=Hedgehog 03-27-2018 06:50 PM

So it's just three new planes, all independent models: seaplane, the same on wheels and a ski one. Full pack of original cockpits and weaponry. Ok...

What took you so long?!

** And of course we don't count DnieproGES (aka Dneprostroi Dam)

Verdun1916 03-27-2018 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by =UAb=Hedgehog (Post 717483)
So it's just three new planes, all independent models: seaplane, the same on wheels and a ski one. Full pack of original cockpits and weaponry. Ok...

What took you so long?!

** And of course we don't count DnieproGES (aka Dneprostroi Dam)

Now now, have a look around the TD-part of the forum and you'll see that they have a lot more they are working on than just three versions of the MBR-2. ;)

Music 03-27-2018 08:35 PM

The Russians have such hard design types, no sense of grace, even the il-2's in the back ground screen shot, (in_case you have never seen a il-2 :grin:), the LaGG's, and the Mig's till that one from 42', functional, but almost intentionally devoid of any feminine lines.

They definitely have their own style.

Models look good, are we headed for a summer of "two weeks". Take your time, still have not thought of a good, unique scenario to build on that expected Chanel map. Is it larger than any other map, or about the same as i.e. the Solomons, with a heck of a lot more objects.

Cheers!

Treetop64 03-28-2018 02:12 AM

Well this is a nice surprise. Looking forward to it!

P-38L 03-28-2018 03:15 AM

Excellent job
 
Hello DT
For me, that's good news. I still fly in this magnificent flight simulator. I will never tire of using it. I have a few friends who are interested in learning to fly this flight simulator. Please, continue with this great project.

JacksonsGhost 03-28-2018 06:59 AM

Thanks for the update, and the great work. It's always nice to see new toys on the way! 8-)

TitusFlavius 03-28-2018 07:09 AM

Thank you for the latest update infos!
IL-2 1946 will never die!)))

ddr 03-28-2018 08:18 AM

YES! thank you TD: a very nice work! :-)

Music 03-28-2018 03:55 PM

First Screen shot, thats a Dam, what map is that on, or something else new.

Sita 03-28-2018 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Music (Post 717492)
First Screen shot, thats a Dam, what map is that on, or something else new.

Its on Donbass map, made by Oknevas, and adopt for patch by him.

Sita 03-28-2018 04:32 PM

https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/3614...a0a5a9_XXL.jpg

stugumby 03-29-2018 12:07 AM

Looks interesting, lovely map and rail road round table etc. Always something to keep me hopefull etc. Good work TD and thanks for posting.

Pursuivant 03-31-2018 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Music (Post 717485)
The Russians have such hard design types, no sense of grace, even the il-2's in the back ground screen shot, (in_case you have never seen a il-2 :grin:), the LaGG's, and the Mig's till that one from 42', functional, but almost intentionally devoid of any feminine lines.

I think that's more design choices by Antonov and his disciples, as well as the tendency for 1930's aircraft designers to create aircraft which look like railroad cars. IMO, the Yak-1 -3, -7, -9, series (first designed 1939, flew 1940) are some of the most graceful-looking aircraft of the period.

Anyhow, I'm just happy for more content, especially because it will feature some of the war's forgotten, unglamorous "ugly ducklings".

GeneralNoob 04-01-2018 01:12 AM

Hi!! Great work! Thanks a lot!!

dimlee 04-02-2018 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pursuivant (Post 717507)
I think that's more design choices by Antonov and his disciples, as well as the tendency for 1930's aircraft designers to create aircraft which look like railroad cars. IMO, the Yak-1 -3, -7, -9, series (first designed 1939, flew 1940) are some of the most graceful-looking aircraft of the period.

Anyhow, I'm just happy for more content, especially because it will feature some of the war's forgotten, unglamorous "ugly ducklings".

Well, Antonov designed just gliders in 1930s and assisted Yakovlev a bit. By the way, it was him who worked on improvements of Yak series in 1943-1945.
He was also known for somewhat controversial remarks about aircraft "beauty". In one of his book he wrote that beautiful airplane flies better. Yet in one of the interviews asked about alleged "ugliness" of one of his transport planes, he responded: "Functional is beautiful".

But back to the topic.
Yes, kudos to TD for making this bird available for flight and sea navigation (what a boat!). :)
More ugly ducklings the better. :-P

Sita 04-02-2018 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dimlee (Post 717514)
this bird available for flight and sea navigation (what a boat!). :)

in late version of MBR will be RPK2 ... i mean if set on map 42 ( or more late year) on pilot panel you will have radio navigation gauge ...

P-38L 04-03-2018 04:16 AM

A technical question
 
When an airplane is used to be taken through a road, it is necessary to have certain caution with the different unevenness of the ground. In most cases, if the plane is tail dragger, and it meets a slope of the ground, it hits the ground damaging the propeller. When using a tricycle landing gear airplane, this effect is less damaging to the aircraft. In the case of an amphibious airplane, as is the case of the MBR, is it possible to go from water to dry land without causing a collision between these two surfaces?

Sita 04-03-2018 07:15 AM

in fact MBR2 wasn't amphibious airplane at 100 persent meaning of this word ...
MBR was or float ( boat i mean ) version .. or Gear ( wheel/Ski version ..)
for MBR wasn't plan to take off from water surface with attached wheels or ski...

it's not a PBY on which you can up and down gears depends of plase where you want to landing ...

but i think you can make successfull landing MBR to ground on boat .... and with some risk you can try land on water with gear ... but it will be some kind emergency landing ...

dimlee 04-03-2018 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717518)
in fact MBR2 wasn't amphibious airplane at 100 persent meaning of this word ...
MBR was or float ( boat i mean ) version .. or Gear ( wheel/Ski version ..)
for MBR wasn't plan to take off from water surface with attached wheels or ski...

...

But they were used with trolleys as well for pulling up the slip (or other slope) or pulling down to the water. I don't attach pictures as I'm sure you have seen them a lot.

Sita 04-03-2018 09:05 AM

sure... we saw it ... but that trolleys is only ground tech crew equipment ...

Pursuivant 04-03-2018 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dimlee (Post 717514)
Well, Antonov designed just gliders in 1930s and assisted Yakovlev a bit. By the way, it was him who worked on improvements of Yak series in 1943-1945.

My mistake, I was thinking of Tupolev. I got confused because so many of his pre-war designs are designated as ANT-## rather than Tu-##.

dimlee 04-04-2018 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pursuivant (Post 717523)
My mistake, I was thinking of Tupolev. I got confused because so many of his pre-war designs are designated as ANT-## rather than Tu-##.

No problem. This confuses many even in the Russian speaking community.
ANT, AN, Antey (An-22). :grin:
I agree with your comment on Tupolev's designs in general.

dimlee 04-04-2018 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717520)
sure... we saw it ... but that trolleys is only ground tech crew equipment ...

So, could it be possible to make those trolleys "appear" only on the ground (as with Me 163), not in the air?

Sita 04-04-2018 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dimlee (Post 717525)
So, could it be possible to make those trolleys "appear" only on the ground (as with Me 163), not in the air?

at first as far i know its problematic in Il2 game mechanics .. some kind like with sbp I16 and TB3 ... but here is more difficult ...

and second thing, as far i see it have no sence ... MBR on ground troley need only to deliver flying boat from dry hangar to water surface ... it makes by ground tech crew... or may be some vechicle ... it take some time.... and after it in water ground personal by hands detach bogie chassis and troley and only after it flying boat ready to take off ...
all that process is only prepearing to flight..

not sure that that part of process need here ...

Sita 04-04-2018 10:47 AM

with me 163 it was part of plane, part of construction .. on me163 you couldn't take off without it.. in case of mbr that thing need only to get in water if you take MBR in flying boat version ...

hun_77 04-05-2018 10:11 AM

First to say, I am looking forward to the new patch. It is amazing that you still work on such an old game.

Just to sum up on what you are working:
Maps:
- A new big Channel Map (for 1940 and 1944)
- Donbass Map

New flyable aircraft:
- MBR-2 in 3 versions (as flying boat, with skies, with fixed landing gear)
(There was a time you were working on a He-177, C-47 and (maybe I'm wrong) Ju-52. Will you continue with these planes?)

Do you work on complete new functions (like the navigation features in 4.?? or the new bombing features in 4.13)?

I am glad to see these teaser pics, I hope you publish more...:grin:

Sita 04-05-2018 11:45 AM

for today content list of 4.14 is not approved

at current moment main position of 4.14 is

He177
MBR2

and Few Maps ... Donbass, Moscow and few others ... with different seasons

all that thing in work now ... and while we work on it may be something else will catch up to content ... will see...

C47 waits import ... Ju52 still in work .. need do alot of thing wit it ...

dimlee 04-05-2018 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717526)

and second thing, as far i see it have no sence ... MBR on ground troley need only to deliver flying boat from dry hangar to water surface ... it makes by ground tech crew... or may be some vechicle ... it take some time.... and after it in water ground personal by hands detach bogie chassis and troley and only after it flying boat ready to take off ...
all that process is only prepearing to flight..

not sure that that part of process need here ...

Agree. I did not think about that. Indeed, if pilot is not involved in the process, it does not make sense.

Fighterace 04-06-2018 12:24 PM

Any American aircraft being worked on??

Music 04-06-2018 04:23 PM

Fighterace said "Any American aircraft being worked on??"

just planes for us to shoot at.

This should go in the wish list, but,... How difficult would it be to make more updated or later versions of the Val, and Stuka, they must have improved them by 43/44/45, at least bigger engines.

I know some stukas on the Russian front had the Wheel covers removed because of the mud as a example.
And another thing, the Late war Betty does not have a bomb load if I remember correctly? does it only carry the Oka, and how do you hook that up.
Here's a formation carrying Oka's getting shot up by Hellcats, in colour 1min+
https://youtu.be/KfqzZG8NzwA

Also noticed the tops of the Trees sway in the breeze in perfect mode, nice touch.

Avimimus 04-06-2018 07:58 PM

Exciting to see the progress!

Marabekm 04-06-2018 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Music (Post 717534)
Fighterace said "Any American aircraft being worked on??"

just planes for us to shoot at.

This should go in the wish list, but,... How difficult would it be to make more updated or later versions of the Val, and Stuka, they must have improved them by 43/44/45, at least bigger engines.

I know some stukas on the Russian front had the Wheel covers removed because of the mud as a example.
And another thing, the Late war Betty does not have a bomb load if I remember correctly? does it only carry the Oka, and how do you hook that up.
Here's a formation carrying Oka's getting shot up by Hellcats, in colour 1min+
https://youtu.be/KfqzZG8NzwA

Also noticed the tops of the Trees sway in the breeze in perfect mode, nice touch.

Bring it one. lol.
We already have the updated Stuka versions. The D-3, then the D-5, and finally the G series.

Yes the Japanese did update the Val. (D3A2) It was still woefully lacking by the time it reached front lines in Rabaul. Something about a D3A vs F4Us and P-38s. After that switched to a new carrier bomber, the D4Y series. (D4Y1,D4Y2,D4Y3) and a version designed specifically for kamikaze, D4Y4.
Have a look here : http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/ijnaf_d.htm

stugumby 04-07-2018 02:00 PM

was relooking at the MBR photos, looks like it has rockets as well as bombs, and the bomb dosnt look like fab 50 or 100? Some type of depth charge??

Sita 04-07-2018 02:24 PM

50 fab as i see ... but variant of loadout on mbr now more wide than in 4.13.4

Pursuivant 04-10-2018 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fighterace (Post 717533)
Any American aircraft being worked on??

If they make it into 4.14, the DC-3 and C-47 definitely count as American aircraft. The Li-2 and L2D variants "sort of" count.

Pursuivant 04-10-2018 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Music (Post 717534)
This should go in the wish list, but,... How difficult would it be to make more updated or later versions of the Val, and Stuka, they must have improved them by 43/44/45, at least bigger engines.

I believe that all major Stuka variants are in the game.

The D3A2 ("Model 22") is currently not in the game and would be a good mid-war Japanese dive bomber type. If it were added, it would be essentially a new airplane since the nose would need to be reworked and possibly the pilot's cockpit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Music (Post 717534)
And another thing, the Late war Betty does not have a bomb load if I remember correctly? does it only carry the Oka, and how do you hook that up.

There are several mid- to late-war G4M variants which aren't in the game and would be welcome. Again, they'd all effectively be new aircraft due to need for revisions to fuselage, engine nacelles, crew stations, etc. and new FM.

IIRC, you have to set up Okha missions using the FMB, attaching the Okha to the bomber like you would assign a glider to a tow aircraft.

Pursuivant 04-10-2018 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marabekm (Post 717536)
Yes the Japanese did update the Val. (D3A2) It was still woefully lacking by the time it reached front lines in Rabaul. Something about a D3A vs F4Us and P-38s. After that switched to a new carrier bomber, the D4Y series. (D4Y1,D4Y2,D4Y3) and a version designed specifically for kamikaze, D4Y4.

In 1944-45 the Japanese adapted a number of their aircraft for suicide operations. It would be interesting to have at least one Kamikaze variant in the IJN line-up (other than just the Okha). Probably, no 3d work would be required, just some FM and bomb-loadout variations to reflect changes in fuel tanks and built-in explosives.

That said, I'd rather have more mid- to late-war Japanese aircraft which were designed to be used more than once. In particular, the IJAAF needs more aircraft types.

taly001 04-11-2018 12:14 AM

Quote:

In 1944-45 the Japanese adapted a number of their aircraft for suicide operations. .........That said, I'd rather have more mid- to late-war Japanese aircraft which were designed to be used more than once. In particular, the IJAAF needs more aircraft types.
The Kawasaki Ki-48 was used throughout the war and as an improvised Kamikaze and special Kamikaze. The thing is totally overlooked in most histories as it was a typical early war design light bomber which most countries found to be pretty useless (think Bristol Blenheim and Martin Maryland). Still it did serve in all Japanese theatres and was the most produced bomber of the IJAAF during WW2!

There is a il2 mod pack for Ki-48 but i don't know if the maker is still around to put it into "Daidalos il2".

Sita 04-11-2018 06:51 PM

in fact we have our own Ki48 maded by SaQsoN)) plus skin by Hayate)

http://i347.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps1c9e4ifi.jpg

http://i347.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps9u3o2hvs.jpg

maded along time ago ... in far far away galaxy

shelby 04-11-2018 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717553)
in fact we have our own Ki48 maded by SaQsoN)) plus skin by Hayate) maded along time ago ... in far far away galaxy

That is awesome news and i hope to see it in the near future in the game.

Verdun1916 04-11-2018 09:54 PM

I can only agree with shelby! That would be a great addition to the game! :D

baball 04-12-2018 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717553)
in fact we have our own Ki48 maded by SaQsoN)) plus skin by Hayate)

http://i347.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps1c9e4ifi.jpg

http://i347.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps9u3o2hvs.jpg

maded along time ago ... in far far away galaxy

Oh my ! (͠≖ ͜ʖ͠≖) What a wonderful plane model. Do you have any plan to integrate it in a future patch after 4.14 ? Btw, the P-47s cockpits really need to be reworked. I still have no idea how they were accepted in the game in the first place.

shelby 04-12-2018 01:41 PM

which variants of the ki-48 will be in the game?

Sita 04-12-2018 01:52 PM

to ealry to say..

Pursuivant 04-12-2018 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by taly001 (Post 717551)
The Kawasaki Ki-48 was used throughout the war and as an improvised Kamikaze and special Kamikaze.

Because it was around for so long, there were a number of Ki-48 variants, many of which aren't in the game.

While modders have done a great job filling in the gaps for the IJAAF, the quality of their work isn't always that good. It would be a pleasant surprise if there were official versions of aircraft like the Ki-30, Ki-44, and Ki-51, as well as a flyable Ki-27 and a few more variants of the Ki-43 and Ki-61.

That would do a good job of "filling in the gaps."

stugumby 04-16-2018 03:11 PM

Will the BF110G family get upgraded for 414? Isn't there a G4 night fighter somewhere in the works. Also since the Il4 has cockpits is there any developments towards the DB3 series becoming fly able?

Corsair family FM, seems overweight and under powered?

Sita 04-16-2018 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stugumby (Post 717573)
Also since the Il4 has cockpits is there any developments towards the DB3 series becoming fly able?

may be in some future... at current moment other goal for 4.14

JacksonsGhost 04-16-2018 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pursuivant (Post 717562)

... a flyable Ki-27 ...

There are two flyable versions of the Ki-27 in the stock game. Great to see the work on the Ki-48 too!

Sita 04-17-2018 07:30 AM

i suppose Pursuivant mean ki21...

Tolwyn 04-17-2018 02:17 PM

Any news on 4.14m?
 
Aside from the compulsory 2 weeks reply.

Where you guys at?
Any update?
What is cemented in for the patch?
What is possibly going to be delayed?

Sita 04-17-2018 02:33 PM

sure we here... and we are working)

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=230149 ...

but as i see all pict was lost some how ... if you need i can upload it? if you don't see it already...

alot of thing planed to 4.14m ... but main thing is few flyable plane ... and and a little more than few maps ...

MBR2 and Finaly long waited He177.... hope soon will be update about that big bird ... we almost finished it ...

Sita 04-17-2018 02:36 PM

pict from link in previous post

http://forum.aviaskins.com/showpost....postcount=1962

http://forum.aviaskins.com/showpost....postcount=1985

http://forum.aviaskins.com/showpost....postcount=1987

stugumby 04-17-2018 03:16 PM

where did the pictures go?
 
Was looking at first post again and for some reason i see no pics, just mini jped squares?

Sita 04-17-2018 03:21 PM

noticed too... don't know what happend ...


you can find these pict on aviaskins ...

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...80&postcount=3

shelby 04-18-2018 11:30 AM

i hope for a new surprise :)

Verdun1916 04-18-2018 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717579)
sure we here... and we are working)

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=230149 ...

but as i see all pict was lost some how ... if you need i can upload it? if you don't see it already...

alot of thing planed to 4.14m ... but main thing is few flyable plane ... and and a little more than few maps ...

MBR2 and Finaly long waited He177.... hope soon will be update about that big bird ... we almost finished it ...

Sadly the photos seem to stillbe down in the other 4.14 news thread. But thanks for linking to the other photos!

The MBR-2 looks awesome, and the HE-177 will be a great additions to!

But...is it to optimistic to hope for that the Channel map + early Spit and Dewoitine D.520 will be ready for the next update? I mean the map itself is a massive uppdate so I understand if you plan to release that further along than the next patch.
Is there any hope of a flyable Wellington or Blenheim?

Sita, you give us all hope! And you wake our curiosity haha! So please excuse all the questions! It's because of said woken curiosity! :D

Cheers and thanks for all the hard work you and the rest of TD is doing!

Sita 04-18-2018 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Verdun1916 (Post 717589)
Sita, you give us all hope!

i'm just too much love to talk)...

it's very nice to see that some numbers of people are still interested in old il2)

Verdun1916 04-18-2018 02:56 PM

Well Sita, IL-2 might be old by todays standard, but it's still a great, if not the best WWII flight simulator. And it's great to see you guys keeping this great sim alive by your updates! :grin:

gaunt1 04-18-2018 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717590)
i'm just too much love to talk)...

it's very nice to see that some numbers of people are still interested in old il2)

You have no idea how many people still love it! :) Maybe this forum is somewhat deserted, but actually there are far more people who still play and love good old IL-2! I have quite a few friends who still play, although most of them are offline players.
New IL-2 is great, looks nice, realistic, etc. but overall nowhere as satisfying as old IL-2.
TD did fantastic job of keeping old IL-2 alive. You guys really deserve respect! :)

Sita 04-18-2018 06:26 PM

Thanks Guys for kind words!)

Tolwyn 04-19-2018 05:55 PM

Thank you Sita. I apologize for not seeing the post you referenced. :(

Can't wait for the update.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717595)
Thanks Guys for kind words!)


Pursuivant 04-20-2018 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717576)
i suppose Pursuivant mean ki21...

Yes. Sorry

stugumby 04-25-2018 02:56 PM

Just curious: does the MBR have a bombsight of any kind?
 
Since it can carry some heavy 250 kg bombs I was wondering if it has any type of bombsight?

Sita 04-25-2018 03:47 PM

2 Attachment(s)
sure ... standart OPB-1 like on most VVS RKKA bombers ...

stugumby 04-25-2018 06:30 PM

Wow,I missed it,saw the post,tube thought it was something else. Cool,love the rope coil too.

nic727 04-25-2018 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaunt1 (Post 717594)
You have no idea how many people still love it! :) Maybe this forum is somewhat deserted, but actually there are far more people who still play and love good old IL-2! I have quite a few friends who still play, although most of them are offline players.
New IL-2 is great, looks nice, realistic, etc. but overall nowhere as satisfying as old IL-2.
TD did fantastic job of keeping old IL-2 alive. You guys really deserve respect! :)

I would like to see the forum move to the new Il2 forum... They did that with Team Fusion and Il2 COD Blitz, so I don't see why they couldn't with Il2 1946.

Sokol1 04-26-2018 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717579)

but as i see all pict was lost some how ... if you need i can upload it? if you don't see it already...

Edit the first post of the topic, replace postimg.org by postimg.cc

From:

https://s25.postimg.org/chr28y9n3/1distr.jpg

To:

https://s25.postimg.cc/chr28y9n3/1distr.jpg

Then: ;)

https://s25.postimg.cc/chr28y9n3/1distr.jpg

This restore all previous Postimages picture links (due a "imbroglio" with Register).

For new uploads they are using http://postimages.org/

Avimimus 04-26-2018 01:41 AM

Is that an RS-82?

Sita 04-26-2018 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avimimus (Post 717615)
Is that an RS-82?


yes)

Sita 04-26-2018 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sokol1 (Post 717614)
Edit the first post of the topic, replace postimg.org by postimg.cc

thanks for the advice)

stugumby 05-05-2018 12:58 PM

Can you tell us anything about the bf110G4 development and how the radar might work?
 
saw some stuff on avia skins and viking wings about the Bf110G4, any news and on the Ju88C6 as well??

Sita 05-05-2018 01:06 PM

i know that one of our mates work on it... 110g4 i mean .. but to current working built it doesn't add for now ...

gaunt1 05-05-2018 01:56 PM

A Ju-88C6, even a simpler day fighter version would be sweet as well...

Avimimus 05-08-2018 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gaunt1 (Post 717643)
A Ju-88C6, even a simpler day fighter version would be sweet as well...

I remember the original plan for Il-2 included a Ju-88C with the gondola deleted - for use as an intruder!

iMattheush 05-22-2018 03:18 PM

Can you add a simple He 111H-1 version, with only 3 MG-15?

stugumby 06-08-2018 09:36 PM

Any more news? im trying to find scenarios from my existing missions to prepare for MBR mission building?

Sita 06-08-2018 10:10 PM

soon... i hope soon will be some news)

Nil 06-10-2018 09:30 AM

Good Job Sita!
I was hoping for the Ju52 and the C47, but I am happy that you will release the patch soon!
Thank you and keep up the good work!

Sita 06-10-2018 09:49 AM

C47 and Co i sure that will be in next one... hope that and Ju52 will be with Dacotas ...)

BrainMan 06-10-2018 04:43 PM

Whait... what? In the next one?! Why is not in 4.14?:confused:

Sita 06-10-2018 05:02 PM

С47 family and Ju52 not ready ... i mean Dacotas is ready but not importerd ... ju52 still not ready 3D ....

but... if you want.. we can add C47 and Ju52 in 4.14, but it will take some more time))
i suppose better have 4.14 now and not wait other stuff from 4.14 more than need)

BrainMan 06-10-2018 05:06 PM

I agree whith you. I thought that Dacotas were included in the game.

Treetop64 06-10-2018 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717733)
С47 family and Ju52 not ready ... i mean Dacotas is ready but not importerd ... ju52 still not ready 3D ....

but... if you want.. we can add C47 and Ju52 in 4.14, but it will take some more time))
i suppose better have 4.14 now and not wait other stuff from 4.14 more than need)

Given how much content already exists in the game, I suspect that many would be happy to wait. I would.

Sita 06-10-2018 09:08 PM

two way ...

wait 4.14 with Transports ... or wait transports have in the hand 4.14 ...

in both variants need wait... i choose second) ...

TitusFlavius 06-10-2018 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treetop64 (Post 717735)
Given how much content already exists in the game, I suspect that many would be happy to wait. I would.

+1

TitusFlavius 06-10-2018 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717736)
two way ...

wait 4.14 with Transports ... or wait transports have in the hand 4.14 ...

in both variants need wait... i choose second) ...

I choose also second variant.)))

Verdun1916 06-12-2018 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717736)
two way ...

wait 4.14 with Transports ... or wait transports have in the hand 4.14 ...

in both variants need wait... i choose second) ...

I'd rather have 4.14 and then wait for the transports until 4.14.1 or later.

But no matter what, I'm looking forward to your next update, Sita! You guys in TD makes one hell of a job!

Looking forward to the MBR-2, HE-177, the Dewoitine D.520, Spitfire Mk.I along with the Channel Map! :grin:

Hoping for flyable Blenheim's and Wellingtons in some future update to! ;)

Verdun1916 06-12-2018 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treetop64 (Post 717735)
Given how much content already exists in the game, I suspect that many would be happy to wait. I would.

Maybe, but I think most players priotitize new combat aircrafts and maps over transports to be honest. I know I do.

Nil 06-12-2018 05:47 AM

Thank you very much for your answer Sita!
I would wait for transports personally , but I understand some people wants the patch without transports

stugumby 06-12-2018 03:08 PM

Is the spitfire 1 a certainty or speculation?

Sita 06-12-2018 03:22 PM

we don't work on Spit I yet ... but we know that it would be nice have Spit I with Channel map..

gaunt1 06-13-2018 07:14 AM

Also a later production Hurricane I would be nice! It was the REAL hero of the battle of britain after all... All it would require is some FM change to the already existing model.

stugumby 07-05-2018 02:27 AM

Any chance of an early read me to set the masses to drooling in expectation? i had seen a post with the under wing gun pods for the ju88, will these be also on the stukas as well?

Sita 07-05-2018 09:47 AM

we have draft of readme ... which is still in the filling stage ... more then 3 page .. plus it need translate correctly ...

also we still on alpha step ... sot for read me for now too early ..

gun pod only on Ju88 at current moment ...

iMattheush 07-05-2018 02:12 PM

I can try to do a Polish translation ;)

Sita 07-05-2018 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iMattheush (Post 717840)
I can try to do a Polish translation ;)

not for readme ... but you can help with some small thing) Check PM)

baball 07-06-2018 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 717839)
we have draft of readme ... which is still in the filling stage ... more then 3 page .. plus it need translate correctly ...

also we still on alpha step ... sot for read me for now too early ..

gun pod only on Ju88 at current moment ...

I can do the french translation if you'd like to.

Sita 07-06-2018 11:49 AM

Thanks) will keep in mind)


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.