Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - @Devs: Stop the Central nerfs

Page 9 of 12

« First

Last »

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)

- - @Devs: Stop the Central nerfs - its enough (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=35061)

Enlem

10-19-2012 10:10 AM

I totally agree with you, Winger.

JG1Baron

10-19-2012 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winger (Post 470792)

Heh never thought i would ever say something like that. But you misinterpreted what i wrote too:) Maybe reread?:)

Winger

lol the only thing I wrote is that I agree with you. That was the first sentence. The second sentence - my personal opinion. ;) Maybe reread? :grin:

Winger

10-19-2012 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG1Baron (Post 470827)

...Bf-109 is worse than it should ever be - or RAF aircraft are too good.

Ok got it. But the way you wrote it it can be read as if your opinion was my contribution. Well, i thinks this is a good example how forumdiscussions can quickly lead to misunderstandings.

Winger

Winger

10-19-2012 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Art-J (Post 470817)

OK, so what »correcting performance even more towards "pro red"« are we talking about anyway? As far as I understand, this is the last patch and current FMs ain't going to change until all these planes appear again in any of upcoming sequel projects, or until some modder cracks the damn code and God only knows when either of two is going to happen. Makes the thread a little pointless doesn't it?

My OP was posted before the patch was final.

Winger

Ibis	10-19-2012 11:48 AM

Well ww2 was nearly called off because of bikkering between RAF and Luftwaffe over whose planes were porked.
"Give me Spitfires-they're not porked like our 109s"
"like our Spitfires are porked like isn't it, not like them 190s"

Nothing changes.

JG1Baron

10-19-2012 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winger (Post 470849)

Ok got it. But the way you wrote it it can be read as if your opinion was my contribution. Well, i thinks this is a good example how forumdiscussions can quickly lead to misunderstandings.

Winger

Yes thats right.

phoenix1963

10-19-2012 12:05 PM

Collect some real evidence

Maybe if some of you luftwhiners got off your b'sides and did some proper testing using the tools posted by 56RAF_Klem, as he has requested in a thread, those of us on the Red side would have some sympathy!
56RAF_phoenix

Ze-Jamz

10-19-2012 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phoenix1963 (Post 470872)

What you on about you fool....

We see what we see as in aircraft in front, higher etc etc...if the 109 flyers are saying it doesn't go above xxx alt then it doesn't go above that alt...if the reds are now saying the hurri and the spit can go 9k then there is a problem, a big one

Couldn't give a rats a** about using tools, were/I am interested in getting the birds close to RL performance making sure the balance is right

Stop being a troll and take both birds to alt and check it yourself...

GraveyardJimmy

10-19-2012 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 470877)

Couldn't give a rats a** about using tools, were/I am interested in getting the birds close to RL performance making sure the balance is right

Thats kind of the point of using tools.

Ze-Jamz

10-19-2012 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GraveyardJimmy (Post 470880)

Thats kind of the point of using tools.

Seriously? I think your missing my point...I'm not trying to prove anything I saying what I see and what I've tested and what others have tested...

Stick yer spreadsheet s ............

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Page 9 of 12

« First

Last »

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page