youre both baddies in my world the difference the class

also you dint bring out my main argumants

solar refraction not studied till 90s

two links saying friction is INDEPENDANT of surface

are the only links IN THE WHOLE WORLD atributting this to coulombs not montomom

edit:

also the ranking of this thread in google as using relativity falsified that my dad a fisicist and mathematician believe and many believe gives away the relevance of this apparently inocnet deluded ramblings thread have since your words instead are cherry picked

edit:

im also sure mods will take this company best interests and take into account that relativity falsified ranks this place 4th while cliffs of dover ranks it 8th :)

Once again, you can't even maintain a level of understanding in your own thread. Look at the title!!! It clearly indicated the lie of relativity. It does not mention ANYTHING about the '90s. Furthermore, you didn't bring up the '90s until halfway through the thread! As usual, you attempted to change the topic partway through the thread.

In the words of your heroine...

EPIC FAIL.

I already noted how the equations should be used and their limitations. Just because you can't understand it does not mean it isn't true.

Wow, NOTHING in the above can even remotely be associated with anything resembling a sentence. A truly awesome example of assininity.

--Outlaw.

Are you going to respond to any of the above questions or just ignore them?

--Outlaw.

i already answered cause they are cherry picked words

your ignoring the fact that i provided a high level link claiming refraction light bending WASNT TAKEN INOT ACCOUNT till the 90s, what means eisntein didnt acount for what means einstein is a farce as the stablishment truths

culombs or montomon laws im not sure any more what to wrtie when asked in physics exam about friction

according in the non affected by tt

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...30612-1834.jpg

and ill translate:

the force strictly necesary to make that a body slides over other is INDEPENDENT of the area of contact and its proportional to the normal reaction

edit:

oh and the true fundamental law of physics its in that link on starlight bending:

nature does as it pleases

edit:

http://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/history.htm

do you realize how history MAY have been rewritten?

even outlaw says friction is DPENDANT on surface

of course its counterintuitive, as counterituivtive as all false things

oh but no way can we both outlaw and me be samrter than those HISTORIC genious who are conspiring and reading this at this very same moment 500 years ago

edit:

hey "they" could tt and eliminate races

if there are no races people will believe friction is NOT dependant of surfaces

those huge tyres may make those who are not conspiring believe galileleo montamas and cuolombs were just crooks

edit:

otlaw your a smart guy try this one:

what happens if you have a double ramp like this ^ in which two identical weights are united through a pulley by an string

the coeficient of friction of the left is 0.1 while in the right 0.9, both weights produce a tangential force to the ramp bigger than friction for being very heavy

heart?
I dont have one, not for humans at least.
Now, for christ's sake: Jump already!


Thank lord!
What were I supposed to do with a fag like him?

oh but i have a rmemebrance of yourself being nice to me

could that have been posible?

http://alaguillotina.files.wordpress...owardly21.jpeg

you know my theory is im an alien who after winning a wormhole dogfight jumped himself to a blcakhole with a big horizont event enough as to cross it alive

people with no heart get sent to it so they got their spirit frozen in time forever so they ruled by fear but i DEMONSTARTED that was false since im here

whats the chance of living now in a 100 year live in trillions of years maybe infinite?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMqsWc8muj8

edit:

oh and plz i hope you LEARN some class form outlaw

what your asking me is your self admitance im so uber in front of you so if i could pity plz let you win ;)

Raaid, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to 'falsify' this or any other Physical theory in the 21st Century! What on earth would be the 'motive' and, even if you presented some form of 'conspiracy theory' - the problem is - who cares and what does it matter? The fact is, no one cares, it doesn't matter and it doesn't make any difference -except to you for some strange reason.

Count on Raaaid to explore the road less traveled...bordering on poetry.

But does the proximity to Raaaid's head deviate the trajectory of thought ?

It would seem so !

the point is lifes beautiful and the worlds perfect though is staged as to look horrible

THIS IS AN UNCERTAINITY

do i want to have the certainty?

really not maybe we live in different universes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Y9aKqawdUQ

Now that is a far more interesting idea - quantom theory and the possibility of parallel universes.....give this one up and have a crack at that, CloD in a perfect state exists.....there you go, start a topic on that!