![]() |
Quote:
I believe the issue is that the game runs worse (for many of us) with the same graphics settings used before the patch. |
Quote:
I even remember Oleg way back when saying that when the sim gets released even the most powerful PC would only be able to play it on medium settings. We're still on the same generation of CPU's and graphics cards that were around at COD's release. I'ld say Luthier and team have done wonders to get the performance to the state of the last patch and that's on mid range hardware at that. Cheers! |
Quote:
Many people want new shiny stuff, but they don't want to "pay" for it, is that what u are saying? Are we going to have this debate again once the dynamic weather is implemented? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
My thought from the start, never thought it would look that good and play on my old system (todays version of CloD is far better than the release version to). Granted it was a Q9550 and Gtx 470 but it was by no means the most powerful pc available (like Oleg said would be required) when CloD was released and yet i see people with far "worse" systems wondering why the performance is so bad while they at the same time are amazed how good the game looks with dynamic lighting. |
Quote:
What am i suppose to say? A game runs fine for 50% and bad for 50% (random numbers), what conclusion can one make from that? As far as im consened there is only one to be made. Its not like they are selling 2 different versions of the game. Sry. Why am i having freezes and lag on 10 year old games and the next guy dont? Games fault? You can stubbornly hold on to "not going to dial down settings because it worked fine on the least version", but does it help you in any way, does it solve the problem? Anyways, i don't think this discussion is meant for this thread. Edit: Dont know if u are talking on or offline or both but there is a huge difference. |
Sounds very promising - bugs ironed out before official patch is released - takes time and no problem with that!
I would guess Luthier avoids reading the 'up date threads' he posts because of the 'questioniong' this and future updates. Hopefully he, or someone in his team, reads the forum threads regards the issues mentioned and takes note. They are relevant and need to be fixed somewhere down the line. |
Quote:
* OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows® 7 / Vista SP2 / Windows XP SP3 * PROCESSOR: Pentium® Dual-Core 2.0GHz or Athlon™ X2 3800+ (Intel Core i5 2.66GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 2.6GHz recommended) * RAM: 2GB (4GB recommended) * VIDEO CARD:DirectX® 9.0c compliant, 512Mb Video Card (1GB DirectX® 10 recommended) – See supported List* * DIRECT X®: DirectX® 9.0c (included on disc) * DVD-ROM DRIVE: 8X * SOUND CARD: DirectX 9.0c compatible (… recommended) * HARD DISK: 10GB * PERIPHERALS: Mouse, keyboard * MULTIPLAY: Broadband connection with 128 kbps upstream or faster * An internet connexion is required to activate the game im in between minimun and recomended. and the gmae will lag and freeze with low settings. I have no issues with the game requiring a minimun fo an i9 32gb ram and 5 gtx960 on uber SLI, but that should be said on the box. i baught this game becosue i had the settings to run it. |
Quote:
Everyone knows its not even close. At least not minimum requirements. I would say that their recommended specs is , at best, minimum requirement. I blame UBI. ;) |
Quote:
Where you got those statistics? anyway, I tested it online and offline, and IMO who say it runs fine haven't properly tested the beta patch, that's all... You can go on the sukhoi.ru forum, use google translator if you need it, and you'll see how many of the users reports bad performance with this beta. Look again at your statistics Baron... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.