Sternjaeger II |
10-28-2011 03:32 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid
(Post 355481)
That would not have been a problem if the Germans had superior pilots.
|
this is a poor attempt David, pilots were superior (in experience and tactics) but in small numbers. It's actually surprising to see how they kept on delivering planes and pilots despite being under siege.
Quote:
From 1942 to 1944 the Germans had access to all the resources in Europe
|
All resources? Care to explain which resources you mean? Germany had the biggest resources at the time, the only two things they really used were oil from the East (until the Americans and Russians started to attack there) and the Dnepr area, which they lost soon. They did the same mistake they did in the First World War: they didn't take resources into account for more than 3 years and found themselves fighting a war of logistic attrition.
Quote:
Stupid strategic planning is no excuse.
|
what? Where were they supposed to fish their pilots exactly? the USA alone had half a million people living there, with no threats and factories working at full steam.. I'm afraid you're missing some important aspects of WW2.
how is that supposed to be a comment worth a reply?
Quote:
I Follow Roads. There are no roads at sea, sparky. The idea that no landmards is better than landmarks is completely absurd.
|
Yeah, brilliant joke, never heard of it :rolleyes: Pilots that relied on landmarks landed in England thinking they were in France and viceversa.. I don't think you have an understanding of IFR man, so, to paraphrase your suggestion of some time ago, Google it before sounding like a complete moron.
|