Even if this actually matches, you can appreciate that Russian intelligence could produce such evidence, don't you think? They needed him dead, or at least they needed some sort of evidence.


I really think you fail to comprehend the fanatism around Hitler's persona. Kids and old men were fighting a lost battle to defend Berlin, they could have surrendered, but they didn't. The only one in the high ranks that had this fanatic view of Hitler was probably Goebbels, the rest of the big wigs were just trying to save their asses or pursuing their plans: Himmler was a cunning bastard who was running his personal agenda, Doenitz had already found an agreement with the Allies, Goering was an utter imbecile, but he surely didn't love his Fuhrer more than he loved himself..

For a better understanding of German fanatism for Hitler read "History of the Third Reich" by your compatriot William L. Shirer, he really managed to give an accurate portrayal of Germany as seen with the eyes of a foreigner.

that's the answer I would expect by someone who believes that Oswald was indeed the killer of JFK. Otherwise a simple "no, I'm not an idiot, thank you" would have sufficed.

Just because you are not aware of the facts does not make them un-true

No, I comprehend it completely. At the end of the war his closest supporters stabbed him in the back. What part of that are you not understanding? These people didn't fight fanatically to the end, they tried to save their own backsides. The people in the bunker weren't fighting fanatically, they were hiding. If one of then could have got better treatment for turning on Hitler they would have done so in a heartbeat. The idea that they all conspired to lie to help Hitler abandon them is one of the most idiotic things I have ever heard. It's almost as bad as the fake Moon landing morons.

he has a point though: can you cite your references? :confused:

Google "Non sequitur". Seriously. You look like a fool.

I'm afraid we're already running around in circles here. Before giving any absolute statement like yours I would at least take into account other people's points of view and evidences, then form my own opinion. I don't think you have any intention to do it, because you already know the truth.

I think you made your point, you can now move on to the next thread.

..you're doing it again Hayward, you really need to calm down man.

No, I really don't have to consider the views of conspiracy nutcases who can't possibly explain away massive holes in their crazy plots. In fact, I rather enjoy mocking them.

Google is your friend. Use it.