Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 60 of 67 « First 10505859 60 6162 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Controls threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=194)
-   -   Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=18648)

Wolf_Rider 02-25-2011 10:28 AM
too bad you mised it on day one, eh?

and you never did explain, in layman's terms, how the interfacing works in ArmAII did you, LoBi...

sigur_ros 02-25-2011 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 228154)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sigur_ros (Post 228106)
You mean like this?

'Implementation of the "HeadTracker" interface is canceled at the request of NaturalPoint.' http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=33510
response to Lobi ...

" Or perhaps you'd like to make some money out of your efforts - I understand you don't.

See, people who want to earn money from their work tend to respect others who try to do the same - this is why companies respect NP's property.

Thread closed. "


So you defend Natuarlpoint stopping clean alternative interface . What happend to consensus?!?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 227231)
the alternatives developers have every opportunity to present a clean alternative to developers in seeking inclusion. A consensus was reached very early in the thread on games should be available to alternative headtracking
If you meant those words you would not jump automatically to defend Naturalpoint like always.

adonys 02-25-2011 11:14 AM
There you go, a direct link to a post of a developer stating another communication interface implementation was stopped at the express request of TrackIR. Which also implies that is might be a current policy of NP to ask simulation developers to only implement TIR interface into the engine.

THAT can be used to sue NP for unfair business competition.

Wolf_Rider 02-25-2011 11:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sigur_ros (Post 228177)

So you defend Natuarlpoint stopping clean alternative interface . What happend to consensus?!?!
"the alternatives developers have every opportunity to present a clean alternative to developers in seeking inclusion. A consensus was reached very early in the thread on games should be available to alternative headtracking"

... yes, I do mean those words



Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys (Post 228178)

There you go, a direct link to a post of a developer stating another communication interface implementation was stopped at the express request of TrackIR. Which also implies that is might be a current policy of NP to ask simulation developers to only implement TIR interface into the engine.

THAT can be used to sue NP for unfair business competition.
the thing about that is there has been a loud noise made about that and no actual proof...

LoBiSoMeM 02-25-2011 11:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 228170)
too bad you mised it on day one, eh?

and you never did explain, in layman's terms, how the interfacing works in ArmAII did you, LoBi...
I explain in layman's terms how FreeTrackClient.dll route works, sorry if you can't understand.

Someone can try explain to W-R in totally moron terms.

Wolf_Rider 02-25-2011 11:29 AM
no you haven't

robtek 02-25-2011 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adonys (Post 228178)
There you go, a direct link to a post of a developer stating another communication interface implementation was stopped at the express request of TrackIR. Which also implies that is might be a current policy of NP to ask simulation developers to only implement TIR interface into the engine.

THAT can be used to sue NP for unfair business competition.
iirc that was at the time when the alternative still included NP software.
The alternative changed that later in this form that then the, not prosecutable, user had to violate the copyright to gain access to titles without freetrack.dll.

adonys 02-25-2011 11:50 AM
bla-blaing around that FACT is only what it is: mindless mumbling. if that statement is true, and was made by a developer, then, I repeat, NP can be sued by anyone having interest in using a WR interface with that product, on the basis of unfair competition, no matter how many bla-blas will you throw in here on NP's behalf to cover it. just ask any lawyer you want for confirmation about this.

robtek 02-25-2011 01:19 PM
adonys, you have to quit on that selective reading.
I wrote: "iirc that was at the time when the alternative still included NP software."
FT was forced to remove the NP Software from its bundle. FACT
The only one who has difficulties understand short sentences and therefore is blah-blahing seems to be you. :-D

LoBiSoMeM 02-25-2011 01:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 228183)
no you haven't
Yes I have. If you are so stupid that can't understand, isn't my fault.

Everybody with a functional brain understood how FreeTrackClient.dll can provide HT data to any aplication.

You still stuck with "mouse look" and "hack". You even can't understand that. Sorry if you are that stupid, I can't do anything about that.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:42 AM.
Page 60 of 67 « First 10505859 60 6162 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.