Thanks Ace.

I will download those and try them out today. :D

Cheers

Some don't have it in GUI, but not many get release with no video card able to force it, even in 2012.

Maybe, but all we know for sure is that there are people with settings and setups like yours that are not having the issues you are having.

Disagree 100%

As your 2650 horizontal res is WAY lower than mine (3840)

Nope, as noted above I just prefer a wider peripheral view

Ill take your word that it has it, but based on the link it requires a hack, as in not aval to all via the GUI.

But your still missing the whole point here.. That being that upon release SWTOR did not have it, just like CoD did not have it. And SWTOR has a much lager budget and team than CoD.

I noticed you didn't provide a quote of me saying that it does not make a big difference

Do you know why you didn't quote me saying that?

Because I never said that.

As in-game settings or Nvidia settings?

Both, if possible? I'd really like to try them out as my GTX 570 has a few slowdowns now and then at 1920x1080. Thank you in advance.

Sorry, but you're wrong. SWTOR didn't offer an in-game FSAA option, but you could implement FSAA through the drivers without problems. At least for NVIDIA cards.

CloD still doesn't work with FSAA unless you use the FXAA injector, which is still just a workaround and no real substitute for workign FSAA.

But the apologizers will, as usually, continue their "it's fine, be sure" song. Nothing new here.

worked with Ati too from launch.

Your horizontal is high in pixel count as you are running a multi monitor res. 1024 on a monitor is very low res or very small image. Both inferior to mine. Wrong again dude, even the total pixels are much smaller than 2650 x 1600.

Wrong again, not missing the point. SWTOR was always able to force it with the videocard drivers with a config hack. Unlike CoD.

Wrong again, I was not talking about you I was refering to post #30, that is why I did not quote you. Although you did say I might have shimmering due to a hardware problem which is also completely wrong.

You are wrong a lot.

And the glass half empty horde will stand in the bar arguing with the bartender while the rest get drunk and try have a good time even though the new chairs are a bit wickety ;)

Agreed 100%

My horizontal pixel count is higher than your horizontal pixel count

Put another way, you only have 69% of the horizontal pixel that I have

Where

69% = 100*(2650/3840)

Agreed 50%

My vertical pixel count is is lower than your vertical pixel count

Put another way, I only have 64% of the vertical pixels that you have

Where

64% = 100*(1024/1600)

Disagree 100%

And note you are switching between talking about the resolution to talking about the image size

And in that regard my setup puts yours to shame!

I have a much lager view (image size) than yours!

Size wise I 'choose' horizontal (perihelial) over vertical..

Why you ask?

Well it should be apparent, but allow me to explain just encase it is not

A larger vertical view means you can see more of your cockpit floor and top of your canopy (your case)
A larger horizontal view means you can see more of the useful sky, what is left and right of you (my case)

Of the two

I think we can all agree that seeing a plane to your left or right (horizontal), at any time, is more useful information

More useful than the context of your cockpit floor, like the visual position of your rudder pedals.

Sorry, but that is incorrect

As you can see above, your horizontal pixel count is only 69% of mine, thus your horizontal pixel count is inferior to mine

Really?

I noticed you didn't provide a quote of something I said that was wrong

Do you know why you didn't quote me?

Because I didn't say anything that was wrong.

Agreed 100%

My total pixel count is lower than your total pixel count

But not by much..

Put another way, I only have 93% of the total number

3932160 = 3840 x 1024
4240000 = 2650 x 1600

93% = 100*(3932160/4240000)

Nope your still missing it.. And the fact that it was a hack and not part of the GUI proves it

Really?

I noticed you didn't provide a quote of something I said that was wrong

Do you know why you didn't quote me?

Because I didn't say anything that was wrong.

Did not a could not

Maybe, but all we know for sure is that there are people with settings and setups like yours that are not having the issues you are having.

Just to be clear

For those who may be reading this..

Note that icarus has yet to quote anything I said that would qualify as being wrong

As for what he 'thinks' I said or saying.. Well I can not be held responsible for that