you might have seen reports or results, it's a known fact the records were destroyed.

[qoute]
It's not plausible because this would have been the biggest secret in modern history. It might be possible for 1 or 2 people to keep that secret, but it's not possible for everyone who would have known. The idea that Hitler could get 20+ minions to lie for him even as his closest supporters (Himmler and Goering) are stabbing him in the back is too absurd to even consider. It's one of the most idiotic things I have ever heard.[/QUOTE]

Really? You probably also believe that Lee Harvey Oswald shot Kennedy all by himself :rolleyes:

you're just looking for another trolling occasion, I personally never cared too much for your opinions, but if you have facts that state without the shadow of a doubt that the remains the Russians allegedly found in a crater close to the bunker were indeed those of Hitler and Eva Braun, then feel free to expose them here, otherwise feel free not to share your opinions, especially if they're denigratory of other people's thoughts and generally offensive.

No, I saw x-rays. So the reports about the records being destroyed were probably exaggerated.

Non sequitur. :rolleyes:

I'm not the one making idiotic and unsupported claims about Hitler escaping from Berlin.

You're the one making the idiotic claim that Hitler may have survived, it's up to you to provide the evidence. So far you've got NOTHING.

I'm sorry, but the fact that the remains the Russians have are of Hitler are as much as a theory as the one that states he fled to Argentina. There is no forensic evidence that the remains they have are of Adolf Hitler.

None of what you are stating is true. Perhaps you can site your sources for your claims. Everything I have stated is based on historical facts yet not one of your statements has any credible sources.

you saw X-Rays of what exactly? And what were they compared with?

yeah, you proved my point, ta.

I'm not saying that either, the author of the book says so, but before calling other people names, a habit that you have and that is really out of place, you might want to hear other people's opinion, instead of going LALALALALALALALALA!

Is there any evidence that proves the bones the Russians have are indeed of Hitler? No. The skull bit they showed is of a woman between her 20s and 40s, as per forensic evidence of FBI experts, and the alleged jaw bone they have is apparently "too fragile" to show to the world.. if you're happy with that explanation then yes, they have Hitler's remains.

If you have a bit of common sense and think that maybe there's a remote chance the Russians are saying a load of baloney, then you might want to look at what facts are available, none of which in fact proves what the Russians claim.

Did Hitler survive? Go to Argentina? Antartica? The Moon?! I don't know, but I would wait to read what others found out about it before calling them idiots.

watch it man, some people here are afraid of historical facts, they think they can beat any knowledge with their blind ignorance, and will start calling you names and offend you just cos they know no better.. :rolleyes:

hang on wait, are people actually saying he died in argentina?

oh i love the internet!

always thought the soviets flushed the cremated remains they had into the moscow sewers anyway.

there are two authors who allegedly gathered enough evidence and witnessing to write a book on it. Regardless of what you think of it, I still think it would be an interesting read, it's up to you whether to take it as an evidence report or a novel :mrgreen:

What the F do you think the x-rays were off? They were from his dentist. They were compared with the teeth the Russians had.

Does he explain how 20+ people would go to their graves lying for Hitler even as his closest supporters stab him in the back? If not, there is no point in listening to him. And I'm not the one going LALALALALALALA here.

Don't know and don't care. If you don't have a plausible explanation why everyone is lying for Hitler, your story is a fraud. That's why Himmler and Goering are such a big problem for you. They were his closest supporters, and they both stabbed him in the back. Do you really think that low level minions would have acted any differently?

See above about no plausible justification for lying.

See about about no plausible justification for lying.

The main problem for this idiocy is that you can't justify how everyone would lie for Hitler when all their incentive is to stab him in the back (see Himmler et al). Not only is it implausible that everyone he left behind would lie for him, it's idiotic.

All we seem to have proved here is that you don't know what a non sequitur is.