answer is the same as last time

Last time?......apologies - I must have missed it!
Please point me to it, it may be buried in approx. 3000 posts, or better still, remind me of what you said.

you are aware FT is a hack, aren't you See?

There is no TrackIR interface in FSX, Troll_Rider.

"We use simconnect to "talk" with FSX, as does some other 3rd party hardware and software." http://forum.naturalpoint.com/forum/...t&Number=20766

FSX is a trackIR enhanced game..... this one has been gone over before

Please explain quote then.

"We use simconnect to "talk" with FSX, as does some other 3rd party hardware and software." http://forum.naturalpoint.com/forum/...t&Number=20766

Which brings me back to my question.....no need to repeat it, its five above this one - but, until it is answered, I for one cannot simply assume (or claim) it is 'hacked' as you and others put it.

I would expect a manufacturer to protect their 'intellectual property' through civil action. If that were not the case I would have to question wether it was in fact their 'Intelectual property', which could possibly explain that manufacturer having to devise an alternative.

the answer was given See...

what does "civil action" mean to a hack?

rather a straightforward statement there and no explanation necessary (even for Gracie)




@

See... you're going nowhere, don't you see that?

That is not an answer to my question.

But one I suspect you cannot answer and yet continue to assert copywright infringement as a reason why FT should not be inclusive alongside TrackIR. Untill you or NP answer the question, you cannot substantiate that argument against inclusion. I would like both for the benefit of all!