lol :grin::grin:

Exactally!

It is sad that Tree feels the need to ignore the fact that some people experiences differ from his.

Because the 'truth' is some people are experiencing big improvements!

But Tree can never acknowledge that simple truth because in doing so his purpose in life would be null n void.

All in all this patch with it's mixed bag of results is to be expected from an alpha/beta patch that was release by the devs with the sole purpose of working with customers that 'ARE' experiencing problems so they can find and fix those problem quicker..

Yet Tree and his followers conveniently ignore that simple truth and act as if this was the 'FINAL' patch release and that 1C promised everything was fixed..

It is times like these I really feel for the devs at 1C..

Talk about a loose loose situation.

Isn't that what everyone was told when they first released this game? I don't think that washes anymore with anyone.

According to poll results, 50% have seen the same or worse performance.

It washes just fine.. Because if it was a bug in CoD that caused the errors 'SOME' are seeing then 'EVERYONE' would be experancing the same problems. But not 'EVERYONE' is experancing the same problems, therefore there is some 'SPECIFIC' about those peooples PCs that in conjunction with CoD is causing the problem! That is why the devs decided to release this alpha/beta patch to get feedback (logs and dump files) from those people who are having problems in the hopes that they can change something in CoD to account for those issues those PCs are having

So what part of alpha/beta patch are you still confused about?

According to this poll about 50% are getting better performance....

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=31780&page=6

I never read anywhere where the Devs said they were releasing it for these reasons. Infact just last week I saw a post from Blacksix that stated they wouldn't release a patch until it did what it was supposed to do which in this case was double the FPS.

lol, oh and its 'experiencing'

Now that's definitely ultra cheap to attack somebody on his or her mastery of the very complicated and not very consistant spelling of the English language particularly if this person is not a native speaker. Very cheap indeed.