Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=132)
-   -   Suggesting to devs (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=8616)

moonknight82 09-18-2009 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vf2supra (Post 102405)
realistic plane models and accurate ones to PLEASE fix the p-51s' flight characteristics and some of the other fighters i beg u:!::!::!:

A Macchi Mc.202 with 4 blades on it's prop....accurate you say???? I could continue... :rolleyes:

moonknight82 09-18-2009 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhantomIIF4 (Post 102053)
I guess that this is the place to put forth suggestions for developers. I didn't see it when I made that other thread. My suggestions are fairly minor and mostly involve the hangar information and what the game refers to various aircraft as but here it goes....hopefully the devs will see my comments.

Ladies & Gentlemen,

First let me start off by saying that I've been an avid fan of the Il-2 series since the Forgotten Battles installment several years ago. I have 1946 installed on my computer and I still play it from time to time. When I heard this series was coming to the consoles I was excited, and I've enjoyed the Xbox 360 version thus far. I've noticed a few odd errors in terms of the factual representation of the airplanes however, and this rather shocked me as the Il-2 series is what I consider one of the more factually accurate representations of WWII aircraft I've ever come across.

I'm not sure if any of these small issues can be fixed, but I thought I would at least try to bring it to your attention and see if anything can be done.

The first thing I noticed is that the weapons descriptions for the Hawker Hurricane Mk II and Bristol Blenheim are incorrect. While both aircraft carried machine guns, they were of the 7.7-mm (.303 cal.) type as opposed to the larger 12.7-mm (.50 cal.) type. I realize it's a minor issue, and most people playing the game will probably not notice it. Just something I felt I should point out. Oh, and since the 12-gun variant of the Hurricane is represented, the designation should technically be Hurricane Mk IIB. Again, not a huge deal, but just something I noticed.

Additionally, as with the Il-2 itself (at least the earlier models), the rocket armed Hurricane variants were fitted with eight RP-3 rockets as opposed to six as shown in the game. It's not a huge deal, but just something I felt I should point out. I'm guessing entire 3D model changes are rather out of the question, but it was worth mention.

The third issue I noticed involves the P-51B. The aircraft depicted in the game doesn't have the appearance of a P-51B, but rather an earlier variant of the Mustang used by the British known as the Mustang Mk.IA. This early variant of the Mustang series has the Allison V-1710 engine (notice the three-blade propeller and cowling differences as compared to a P-51 variant with the Merlin engine). Thus, in the interest of historical accuracy, this aircraft should be renamed the Mustang Mk IA in all game references to it. Additionally, the armament listing in the hangar of four 12.7-mm Brownings (which is correct for a P-51B) should be listed as four 20-mm Hispanos, which was indeed the armament of the Mustang Mk IA.

Anyways, I hope some of this information can be put to use in potential patches or game updates. Thank you for anytime you can put into reading my comments.

For more errors, check out my posts! It's good to see another person on here knows their stuff!! One of the most irritating is the use of incorrect marks of Spitfire and Hurricane for the BoB....

NephilimUK 09-18-2009 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moonknight82 (Post 102475)
For more errors, check out my posts! It's good to see another person on here knows their stuff!! One of the most irritating is the use of incorrect marks of Spitfire and Hurricane for the BoB....

What about Corporals being RAF combat pilots? Hmm??... *strokes beard*

moonknight82 09-18-2009 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NephilimUK (Post 102511)
What about Corporals being RAF combat pilots? Hmm??... *strokes beard*

That's true, but I was talking about aircraft inaccuracies, as I have stated before.

Lexandro 09-18-2009 08:29 PM

Actually there were a number of instances of Corporals getting combat flights simply due to lack of trained pilots. During the battle of Britain and the preceeding months, the RAF was in a bad way. The pilots were overstretched, undermanned, outnumbered, and out-gunned by the Germans.

At one point even ground crew were given the option of flight training for combat status, enitrely outwith there ranks.

propagandawarmachine 09-19-2009 12:56 AM

I would like to get of stall warnings in realistic game mode. and a force cockpit option once the German cockpits come in. Also if you could create a true rear gunner view to force that aspect also.

BACKSTABINGPRIK 09-19-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anton yudintsev (Post 87228)
please, send all your suggestions about the game title update - here.
We'll try to do whatever we can, if there will be title update.
Please, stay reasonable - we can't add pacific theater or mission editor in title update.
I don't promise we'll do everything, or even anything :) but we'll read all of your feedback carefully.

I can't read all these treads, and i do not read private messages either.
And, please, no flood or repeative suggestions here.

Thanks in advance!

P.s. As for sequel suggestions - let's wait for game release first.

respawns have to be controlled in both the time back in and the selected amount by the host to how many lives you will recieve..... This will prevent cowardly deliberate crashing just to get a brand new plane..... Keep it as real as possible...

simfex 09-19-2009 02:01 PM

This idea is as simple as good.Great!

Molgera 09-19-2009 09:07 PM

It would be nice to be able to look around by pushing once on the right stick, instead of having to keep it down. Then push a second time to come to regular view.

Current way is giving me cramps..

What do you think ?

moonknight82 09-19-2009 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lexandro (Post 102627)
Actually there were a number of instances of Corporals getting combat flights simply due to lack of trained pilots. During the battle of Britain and the preceeding months, the RAF was in a bad way. The pilots were overstretched, undermanned, outnumbered, and out-gunned by the Germans.

At one point even ground crew were given the option of flight training for combat status, enitrely outwith there ranks.

It wasn't standard practice though...not by a long shot...

BTW My eyes keep getting drawn to you sig pic...Mk.5 Spits with green/brown camo??...interesting...


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.