Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   4.12 development update discussion and feedback (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=31734)

Buster_Dee 10-18-2012 03:03 AM

I've always thought we should create characatures of NG planes--really ugly, waddling, nasal-sounding ones. When you fire the guns, the wings fall off.

Maybe possums for nose art....

Asheshouse 10-18-2012 10:42 AM

From the Northrop Grumman web site

Quote:

Northrop Grumman welcomes the opportunity to discuss your technology needs and how the company’s intellectual property may be able to help your business succeed.
Send a letter with your name, email address, telephone number, and a brief description of your interest to the following address:
Intellectual Asset Management
Northrop Grumman Corporation
2980 Fairview Park Drive
Falls Church, VA 22042
E-mail: ip.licensing@ngc.com
Maybe those that feel strongly about these things should make their feelings known.

It may be interesting to note that they claim Trademark rights on the name Enterprise.

USS Enterprise CVN-65 is still in commission. "Enterprise" is the name of the class of ship, not the individual ship.
They don't claim trademark rights for "CVN-65" or the name "USS Enterprise". Captain Kirk might have something to say about that if they did :)

Fighterace 10-18-2012 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asheshouse (Post 470357)
From the Northrop Grumman web site



Maybe those that feel strongly about these things should make their feelings known.

Hmmm, interesting :cool:

Pursuivant 10-18-2012 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asheshouse (Post 470357)
Maybe those that feel strongly about these things should make their feelings known.

It's piss in the wind. The only things those bastards respect are money and lawsuits. We're talking about a company as amoral and vicious as Vickers was in the early part of the 20th century: people who will sell weapons to dictators and pay bribes to do it. They'll laugh at a few fanboys trying to shame them into proper behavior.

Anyhow, TD and 1c/Ubisoft don't want to mess with N-G and I respect their decision.

Pursuivant 10-18-2012 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DuxCorvan (Post 470228)
G) Four years ago, someone should have handed a copy of Il-2 to George Bush, Sr., and then let him browse the list of flyables, just to hear him say "What the..." before his son, George W. ;)

Let's not make this about one political personality or party. The issue is copyright and patent trolling, which cuts across political lines.

I am of the opinion that N-G's trademark claims to any product produced for the U.S. government before or during WW2 is unsustainable, for a number of reasons I've already mentioned.

It also appears that their IP policies are inconsistent. They allow trademark free use of pictures of their past products, but not 3d computer images or simulations? How is a 3d image not art? Why should use of that art in a video game be any different from a static picture of that object in an old-school tabletop game?

I'm not a lawyer and I'm not sure how one would start a campaign to overturn crap like N-G is doing. There are a number of petition sites, which could be used to bring attention to the issue, but I'm not sure how to frame it.

IceFire 10-18-2012 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pursuivant (Post 470589)
Let's not make this about one political personality or party. The issue is copyright and patent trolling, which cuts across political lines.

I am of the opinion that N-G's trademark claims to any product produced for the U.S. government before or during WW2 is unsustainable, for a number of reasons I've already mentioned.

It also appears that their IP policies are inconsistent. They allow trademark free use of pictures of their past products, but not 3d computer images or simulations? How is a 3d image not art? Why should use of that art in a video game be any different from a static picture of that object in an old-school tabletop game?

I'm not a lawyer and I'm not sure how one would start a campaign to overturn crap like N-G is doing. There are a number of petition sites, which could be used to bring attention to the issue, but I'm not sure how to frame it.

Although I can't speak for Dux, I imagine his comment about George Bush Senior was the tip off that this probably wasn't a political statement but rather a personal one. George Bush Senior was a TBM Avenger pilot. He was even shot down in one.

Zorin 10-20-2012 05:56 AM

The first two out of most likely four Type 91 torpedos. Completely new meshes due to the loss of all Japanese ordnance work by means of a faulty HDD.

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/b...Render_pub.jpg

mkubani 10-20-2012 07:59 AM

Zorin, send me the models for review. And please let's keep this thread related to 4.12 dev. updates. If you want, start a new thread for loadouts modelling or keep the information flow over PMs / emails.

Zorin 10-20-2012 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkubani (Post 471284)
Zorin, send me the models for review. And please let's keep this thread related to 4.12 dev. updates. If you want, start a new thread for loadouts modelling or keep the information flow over PMs / emails.

Rgr that.

ElAurens 10-20-2012 01:56 PM

Thanks for the work on this Zorin.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.