Have you lost the ability to read, Farber, or merely the ability to remember what you have read for more than ten seconds? I've already provided the links to what you are asking for...

You seem locked up in a tiny victim room, wearing goggles of paranoia.

Maybe you're just very open minded, then again I expect you to defend the Islam with the same elan the next opportunity you get.

I see, you hid it away in a previous post. However they are the views of forum members. Its a bit like comming on here and talking about RoF, it doesnt mean the devs have anything to do with RoF... :rolleyes:

Err, no. I merely don't think that discussing my ethnicity and/or religious beliefs is relevant to the discussion - except to a significant proportion of deranged conspiracy-theorist loons, who seem to have a predilection for finding 'the Jews' behind everything. Given that any response I gave would promptly be incorporated into the conspiracy theory anyway, it seems obvious that it shouldn't have been dignified with a response. Still, for the record, since others seem to think it matters too: no, as far as I'm aware I don't have any Jewish ancestry (I'm English-Scottish-Irish with a bit of Belgian-or-possibly-French, at least as far as I know - though one of my brothers is investigating our ancestry further, so who knows what will turn up next). And as an atheist, I've no wish to convert to Judaism either.

Of course, the conspiracy theorists will now assume that I'm lying, to hide the dark secrets...

...who seem to think the forum is an appropriate place to discuss them.


And no, Harris arguing for a 'benign dictatorship' doesn't come into the 'forum members views' category, does it? Do you agree with him, or not?

wait, what?

Don't expect it to make sense - this is an investigation into abnormal psychology. ;)

Aren't we all here for that? :cool:

I must have missed the part about a dictatorship. Can you show me that bit. I could not find it.

"Do I agree with him?" What he is saying is the terms and definitions of law. You cant disagree with a definition really. In most technical books you will find a definition of terms, detailing each word used and its meaning. The legal book would be blacks law dictionary, however there are several versions of it and to make it even more complecated the basis of law the Magna Carta is written in Latin and the people that wrote it up spoke in old English. So a modern term or word wont nessicarly mean the same thing today as it did then.

Farber, if you can't be bothered to look at links when I provide them, why should I bother to provide them again?

As for the "Freemen's" interpretation of the law, it is total bollocks. You may be gullible enough to believe this nonsense, but the courts don't. You've been had...