the spelling and capitaisation gave it away as not being his, although...

having said that, the most obvious way of raaaaid appearing "undercover" would be to alter his trademark posting tics.

Sounds like someones choking on the truth

That is utterly moronic. Hitler's scientists had a choice between helping us or the Soviets. Hitler was not a factor.

LOL! Well as someone who works at WSMR, and actully works in the same building that Von Bran worked in, I can assure you there are no sweet apartments to be had on this post.. This post where Von and his buds were force to stay and work for years after the war ended. Bettter than tha USSR? You bet, but far from a sweet apartment.

So let me see if I can understand your so called logic here

It is Christianity (Judeo Christians) that caused Hitler to do what he did?

Hitler

The guy who killed not only Jews, but all forms of religion that was in competition with the Nazi belief system

Hitler

The German that wanted to and was in the process of creating his 'own' Nazi religion based on some made up wicka form of German tribal history?

Is that what you expect us to belive?

And they say 'we' need a leap of faith! LOL!

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/fbi-belie.../148894-2.html

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16090144

well, the Allies knew about the research on nuclear weapons done by the Germans, and I would think it's not like they left the potential escape to the very last minute.. accessing that info in 1943 or 1944 would have been of vital importance for the race to nuclear weapons.

I'm not saying I believe it all of course, but I wouldn't even rule it out completely. The fact still remains that there is nothing that proves that what they found were the rests of Hitler and Eva Braun. The modern forensic evidence gathered by FBI experts seems to tell that the skull bits found do not belong to a man in his late 50s. I am pretty confident that finding a body with a bullet wound to the head wouldn't have been a hard task to accomplish in Berlin in 1945.

As for the witnesses that reported the facts: if they were devoted enough to spend their last days in a bunker with Hitler, I really don't see why the few of them could have as well decided to do their ultimate act of faith and lie about Hitler's fate.

In any case, I do not understand on which basis you lot think this couldn't be even remotely possible.

Do you have a link to this report? And to the report which says the teeth the Russians have is not Hitler's?

Because there were multiple witnesses and the odds that all of them would maintain this lie for the rest of their lives is pretty close to ZERO.

from good ol' wiki:
"According to the Russian Federal Security Service, a fragment of human skull stored in its archives and displayed to the public in a 2000 exhibition came from Hitler's remains. However, the authenticity of the skull fragment was challenged by historians and researchers,[277] and DNA analysis conducted in 2009 showed the skull fragment to be that of a woman. Analysis of the sutures between the skull plates indicated that it belonged to a 20–40-year-old individual.[278]"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...llet-hole.html

but anyway, if dental records of the high command were destroyed, as per Bormann's 1944 order, how could they say they recognised the rests from their teeth? Bormann's dental record themselves were reconstructed "from memory" by his former dentist to identify his remains.. really guys? :rolleyes:

yeah, well you might be aware of the hysterical faith and support the Germans had for Hitler. Do you really think that 20 (I say 20 as a hypothetical number) people couldn't swear on a oath of faith and lie? If you don't believe this is possible then there's no point in continuing this conversation.