ah well, for one its not our fault, its the fault of whom ever forced the early release.
We can have no direct effect the game speaks for itself, do you think all the reviewers read this forum? no they test then review. So untill the game improves the reviews will be bad, and when it does improve which i believe it will the trust will be won back for all the people that feel they have been told untruths about what this game contains, check the digital sites right now and tell me why they "removals" from the game are still listed as in the game. That is just asking for it surely?

This type of thread is really boring tbh, it doesnt even promote honest discussion, you want honesty? how about this release was to generate funds to make the full game next time, i've heard that a few times here and that seems to be the most logical business angle i have heard.
Not sure what i believe but all i know is times have changed since IL2 the early days and this would never have happened them.

U might wanna check your eyesight, again.


http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/c...00/BF109-1.jpg

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/c...000/Namnls.jpg

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/c...1000/Moth2.jpg

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/c...1000/Moth1.jpg


Just because u repeat the same thing over and over and over again wont make it true, however much u want it to.

As far as someone else filling the gap, u really believe that, dont u?

for me its simple. When game came out there was no way i could run it. I dont have money to buy a high end system, and what i have have worked fine, even in arma 2. I simply cant convince my self to get a game there is 70% chanse i cant run..

In the future if i can play it without being a pile of huge pixels i will give it a try. But i rather miss out on it instead of getting disapointet..

LT

I supported the devs by buying the game. It is the devs that let me down - the reviews unbiasly reflect this fact

It' just the truth, the game is a mess..period! Only the dev's are to blame, they took the risk of releasing it far too early and are paying the price, nobody want's it cancelled. You have to look at DCS A10, it was released in Beta state and you could buy it and give feedback to help finish it before official release. The same thing has happened here, but they just forgot to tell us it's a Beta release!

Honestly, the game is not running in full screen, nVidia nhancer/inspector can not see the game, that point itself is a joke.

It's NOTHING to do with hardware, I bought it the day it came out, my 2600k overlocked just fell on it's ar$$. Under 10FPS and massive pauses, blocky graphice, I think FS 5.1 looks better.

Whoever mentions WoP again deserves ten lashes at dawn.

U have to understand, some flight simmers prefer NOT being able to see the horizon. I mean, whats it doing there anyways, its not like i need it or anything. ;)

this thread is getting nuts.

My AV reports the sim enters full screen mode.. so now I'm all confused



nuts? yeah...
perhaps a passing mod could deem this thread a waste of bandwidth and close it?

From what i know now (i have no proof for this, i only heard it) it was 1C Softclub that wanted to cancel the whole project. It was Ubi that forced them to continue! So it is not ubis fault what happened. And if iam correct this puts the fact that Oleg has left the building in a whole new light.

But i think ubi sees their balance sheet and will try to get the game to status, that it can be released in the states.

After that i highly doubt, that there will be any kind of support for this game. If not a miracle happens. It really depends on the sales in USA i think.

So everything lies now on Luthiers shoulders and he needs every support we can give him.