Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 39 of 40 « First 293738 39 40
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Update, February 10, 2012 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=29662)

ACE-OF-ACES 02-14-2012 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [URU]AkeR (Post 390796)
I don´t want/care to know how you guys feel. For sure most of the entire world doesn´t either. I check this topic to see the updates and any relevance info that might come up. But have to dig in pages and pages of the same complaints over and over. Is very annoying.
I feel your pain..

Or should I say felt? Because I did find a way around it.. A filter if you will..

Simply goto page one, click on BlackSix's name, select Find all posts by BlackSix than click on his posts with the title of this thread..

That is the best way to see the updates and any relevance info that might come up with regards to the current thread..

Because honesly, the rest of the posts are just 'feelings'! ;)

Tavingon 02-14-2012 09:59 PM
Someone please just tell me the bofors wont be as hideous to aim as the aircraft gunnery positions

Rjel 02-14-2012 11:16 PM
Maybe the update threads could be locked? Someone could always start a 30 plus page thread for the sky is falling complaints. Another could be started telling us it's all okay, don't worry. It would save time too. We'd only have to read the posts we agree with. The world would seem right then for each of us.

bongodriver 02-14-2012 11:22 PM
Someone already suggested that but it seems the idea was rejected

Dano 02-14-2012 11:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood (Post 390612)
And why would you cancel a pre-order when you don't know what the product is like until you receive it? I don't speak Russian so could not access their forums, and there wasn't enough information available on these forums to allow anyone to make a decision one way or the other.

Your point really doesn't hold up, does it?

Over and out.

Hood
There was plenty enough information here and at SimHQ to know it was in a state, you didn't need to read or visit Russian forums, my point holds up perfectly well.

Chivas 02-15-2012 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 390839)
Someone already suggested that but it seems the idea was rejected
Its too bad as I think it would be great to have only four threads.

A locked Luthier/BS thread.

A constructive criticism thread.

A Debbie Downer thread.

A Fanboi thread.

I suppose it would be alot of work for the moderators moving posts, lol. The community would be a much happier place if we only read the applicable threads. Although the forums would be extremely quiet, when you separated the Debbie Downers, from the Fanboi's.

14./JG5_Roman 02-15-2012 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [URU]AkeR (Post 390796)
I don´t want/care to know how you guys feel. For sure most of the entire world doesn´t either. I check this topic to see the updates and any relevance info that might come up. But have to dig in pages and pages of the same complaints over and over. Is very annoying.
Well put sir!

JG26_EZ 02-15-2012 04:38 AM
What good is a skin pack if "Steam" has you ejected if you are flying with an altered one?

Or so, that's what I've read. ...or has this changed?

Varrattu 02-15-2012 07:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst (Post 390420)
Well its a good thing then that it was Messerschmitt AG that published these papers, so you can trust them with your life for authenticy. :D

Anyone wishing to check the original Me 109E specs paper should check here - there is not much to add except that this is the official performance guaranteed by manufacturer within +/- 5% in speed (ie. 475 - 525 km/h at SL) and +/- 8% in climb.

http://www.2shared.com/document/-XYw...chreibung.html

This tended to be an average of performance - any plane that did not meet the above specs within tolerance was rejected by the LW's quality control group, abbreviated BAL.
The document does not include any statement indicating that the datas are from a Bf109E. I am not convinced that this is the Bf109E as it went into serial production.

Regards Varrattu

Kurfürst 02-15-2012 07:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varrattu (Post 390893)
The document does not include any statement indicating that the datas are from a Bf109E. I am not convinced that this is the Bf109E as it went into serial production.

Regards Varrattu
Well, at least I do not know any other 109 variant with DB 601, with exactly the same weights and dimensions and specs as the Bf 109E... :D

Anyway, you can buy the full version at http://www.luftfahrt-archiv-hafner.de/. I do not have it, but they list it as for Bf 109E.

Its a bit like arguing that a British doc from 1940 mentioning "Spitfire" is unconvcing, because it does not say Spitfire I.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 AM.
Page 39 of 40 « First 293738 39 40
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.