Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   v1.05.15950 PATCH BUG THREAD (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=27168)

FG28_Kodiak 04-03-2012 05:03 AM

It work online, but there is sometimes a problem with the red side. This red side bug was reportet shortly after the latest patch, directly to a dev. So no need to report it.
Damn we really need a bug tracking system :rolleyes:

salmo 04-03-2012 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FG28_Kodiak (Post 405327)
It work online, but there is sometimes a problem with the red side. This red side bug was reportet shortly after the latest patch, directly to a dev. So no need to report it.
Damn we really need a bug tracking system :rolleyes:

Kodiak makes a very good point about tracking bugs. I think I read somewhere that the dev's don't have time to setup & manage a formal bug tracking methodology. There is plenty of free bug-tracking packages out there (bugzilla or mantis bug tracker etc), but we'd need to the dev's to come onboard for any bug-tracking to be of benefit.

hc_wolf 04-03-2012 08:25 AM

I agree Salmo. In the meantime Kodiak has seen the error of my code and the good new is now that ATAG server 2 mission Red V Blue 1.0 has operation menu in game now.

Just made the change and uploaded and working fine :)

41Sqn_Banks 04-03-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hc_wolf (Post 405361)
I agree Salmo. In the meantime Kodiak has seen the error of my code and the good new is now that ATAG server 2 mission Red V Blue 1.0 has operation menu in game now.

Just made the change and uploaded and working fine :)

Keep in mind that there is still a bug with the red comm menu as soon as there are a couple of blue flights in the air.

FG28_Kodiak 04-03-2012 08:46 AM

Hope it's fixed in the next patch :rolleyes:

Ataros 04-03-2012 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salmo (Post 405343)
Kodiak makes a very good point about tracking bugs. I think I read somewhere that the dev's don't have time to setup & manage a formal bug tracking methodology. There is plenty of free bug-tracking packages out there (bugzilla or mantis bug tracker etc), but we'd need to the dev's to come onboard for any bug-tracking to be of benefit.

In one of Q&A threads luthier answered that it would be good if community makes the tracker. I guess the only issue is hosting and an admin who can manage it. Maybe there exist some IT guys here?

albx 04-03-2012 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ataros (Post 405369)
In one of Q&A threads luthier answered that it would be good if community makes the tracker. I guess the only issue is hosting and an admin who can manage it. Maybe there exist some IT guys here?

we can use mantis http://www.mantisbt.org or bugzilla http://www.bugzilla.org and I can host it if it's ok to everybody

Ataros 04-03-2012 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albx (Post 405372)
we can use mantis http://www.mantisbt.org or bugzilla and I can host it if it's ok to everybody

It would be great indeed.

The only important criteria is if the program has a voting/rating system to allow us voting for bugs and features.

Here is another free one used by ACE of ArmA2 http://www.redmine.org/
Sample of buglist http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/issues

FG28_Kodiak 04-03-2012 09:10 AM

Thats great news, i think the best is to activate it after the next beta patch.

albx 04-03-2012 09:28 AM

ok, I'll install some of those and see what is better... then we can decide.. ok? giving to somebody else the access as admin would be good... not only one admin... ok?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.