@Blacksix,
will the Russian P40 be included in sequel??Any version of the p40 is my favorite plane.Can you show us a screen shot of that?

Reasonable, yes. But at the same coin, it's also reasonable to expect people to express their displeasure with the product in a manner befitting some semblance of adultness, i.e. not with some of the temper-tantrums people have been throwing around here. As others have stated, I'm also not happy about the product in it's current state. But that doesn't mean that I'll go out of my way to behave like a 4-year old denied of sweets.

If you think my responses cajoling or semi-condescending, Merlin, that's up to you. You're free to interpret my responses as you see fit, but that doesn't change the fact that people seem unable to not behave like children denied of sweets just because a software-product isn't up to the standard they'd like it to be.

Again, your squad-member was most likely banned because of HOW he let his displeasure be know, not because he did so. There's a subtle difference there, and it seems that as soon as people get on the 'net, they forget or overlook that.

This has been brought up before..... but, here goes again;

I wonder, has anyone actually tested whether or not the product meets the description, by trying to get a return? Most countries (at least in the EU) have consumer law that protects consumer against faulty product. As yet I'm not aware of anyone actually reporting a successful return of CloD. Is this because;
1. No-one really thinks it is faulty enough to succeed in a return,
2. People are actually happy to sit and wait for what they believe will be eventual fixes to the game
3. People are playing it happily enough in spite of the reported issues

I suspect (2) is the main reason. Folks do believe the messages from 1C/ MG, and are holding on for the fixes. How long will they wait before using their legal protections and requesting refund? Will they likely succeed if they ask for refund?

I don't know what world you live in mate but you really need to get out from behind your comp. Bleating your definition of adult behaviour just makes you sound silly and naive. This 'acting like children not getting a thing is getting a bit old and, itself, childish.

Next update can we take the discussion thread a step farther?

As an example:

B6 posts an update, only questions concerning the update info are allowed (and of course B6's answers)

And then a separate discussion thread for all other discussion based on that?

Only reason I ask is, 1) the language barrier/communication issues and 2) the fact that alot of good info just seems to get lost in a s**t storm of garbage.

just a suggestion...

+1

I know it's a lot of work for you mods but it will be very useful.

Woot, come on all we have seen so far is Russian/Red aircraft it's about time we saw the 109F and 190A :D but I do hope we get the p40 ;)

The problem is that the info and the answers that B6 gives here are zero in comparison with his activity in sukhoi.ru ....

It's only happened once and the reason why was explained by FS-Phat, a simple language barrier...