David Harward said:

>>How would you summarize what you have achieved in here? <<

Not much, but I have called you on your awful malicious manner, and that is good enough for me.

Anything else, such as pointing out Chivas' complete and utter works of fiction (i.e. pretending to know what is going on inside the dev house, and general Yoda-ness) is a bonus before the ban takes place.

And then you can prcatise nastiness against others not so adept at responding. But with me, you'll get nowhere.

Ben

I see you never got the account deleted like you begged for Ben Scammel.......so who really came here just looking for a fight?

Congrats for that "accomplishment"!

Do you expect anyone is ever going to call you out for your awful malicious manner?

Chivas, those in glass houses should not throw bricks. You have the grammar and spelling capability of a 14 year old boy. Common sence really.

And I am being sarcastic. But comments like this are spiteful, no? And serve no purpose to the debate at hand. Addman is right.

Whilst I find you one of the more level-headed posters, Falstaff is correct: you do act as though you have some inside knowledge none of us are aware about. Did you support Tree's posts pre-release? If so I would have to bow down to your current 'knowledge' and assume it's correct; but otherwise history shows that you've got no credible background to substantiate your allegations. I don't think any of us do really: just lucky (fluke-ish on some level; realistic on others) guesses.

CloD isn't a maturing baby. It's a late birth infected with a curable host of illnesses. And you are no doctor; nor are any of us. But at the end of the day, the illnesses are currently unshakeable.

And that may sound harsher than I intend it to be, because I do believe the game will mature into something great: be it through add-ons or community service.

Actually taildragger, I did..check with the mods. I checked-in again on the off-chance that my IP cycle has ticked over, whcih it seems to have done. The only reason was to give back a taste to some posters what they have been dishing-out, which I dont like.

A ban is imminent (I hope) so you can carry on lionising such posters if you wish, and defend their right to attack people unopposed. I'm not pretending to be a white knight of righteousness, more just venting at some of the nastier idiots who seems to have this place in thrall.

Ben

2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy

p.s. @Philiped you spelled sense incorrectly

david Hayward said:

>>Do you expect anyone is ever going to call you out for your awful malicious manner? <<

No, because generally I do not have one. I am posting specifically because of your postsm, recently, and previously. And they deserve to be held up.

And your endless use of the interrogative (question) is dull as dishwater.

taildragger said:

>>2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy <<

No, they dont. But a little natural justice doesn't hurt occasionally, if it's kept in check, and if it's justified, as here.

Ben

All evidence in here to the contrary, I suppose.

But I thought you said you weren't pretending to be a 'white knight', now you proclaim yourself a champion of natural justice.....