![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course you can save a fuel you are not consuming at a high rate. They wanted 800,0000 tons on hand before the first operational aircraft used it, remember?? Look at the fuel at the airfields in your first document. 100 Octane is less than 38% of the fuel on hand in June-August. http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...mption-bob.jpg |
Quote:
Oh anyone wondered why the fuel is listed as 100 octane and 'other grades'?.......it's almost like anything that isn't 100 octane is secondary :rolleyes: |
Crumpp.....in the long run it is going to be less embarrassing just to admit you are wrong on this, it takes balls to do it so I won't hold my breath.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
PS am still waiting for your evidence that May 1941 was the final switch over for FC. |
Quote:
|
Here's another copy of the document NZtyphoon shared. Obviously NZtyphoon added the other 100 octane data prior to June 1940, taken from similar War Cabinet documents, to show the trend and build up of 100 octane fuel.
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...40-April41.jpg This can also be obtained from the National Archives at CAB 68/8/36 |
Quote:
Tell me you wouldn't use the grenades. |
With factory-new replacement fighters continually arriving at all airfields from July '40 onwards, I just can't see two sets of fuel bowsers crisscrossing each other in the dispersal area -- a combat zone, no less -- going from fighter to fighter asking "Premium or Regular?" "Do your windshield?" "Check your oil?"
Nope, one fuel only. And no one is putting 87 octane into a 100 octane-rated engine, but there would be no hesitation putting 100 octane into an older 87 octane-rated Merlin. Common sense and expediency rules in a combat zone. Pass the grenades! So devs -- give us our 12 lbs boost. This is what it's all about, isn't it? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.