Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - Do we need AI at all? I do not think so...

Page 3 of 5

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)

- - Do we need AI at all? I do not think so... (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=32676)

5./JG27.Farber

06-16-2012 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vo101_tom (Post 435420)

hi. Pls do not forget that the majority of players do not come here every day, in fact, the majority of players are not registered, they are who prefer offline play. (i say this based on the hungarian community, il-2 and clod). On this basis, 70 percent more believable than the 20...

And i agree, the ai is also important for the online play... No question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by parab (Post 435421)

you mean a poll in an online forum where 99% of the customers don't even bother to register?

:confused:

Sounds legit.

yes. :-p

tintifaxl

06-16-2012 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by He111 (Post 435446)

I think this question is just filler .. the real question is, when do we get access to SDK, so we can fix AI bugs!

.

I don't think they'll release an SDK at all.

nearmiss

06-16-2012 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ParaB (Post 435344)

You should stop doing that. Seriously.

SiThSpAwN

06-16-2012 05:48 PM

I still use Illustrator all the time, why get rid of it? Wait... what?

Bakelit

06-16-2012 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BG-09 (Post 435342)

Well...gentlemen...

I think

Simply don't. This will get you in all kinds of trouble, says this offliner.

ems9	06-16-2012 09:17 PM

That suggestion/idea is pointless, nothing real to discuss.

Being a little of topic: It would be great to have "multiple" simulators in CoD or new versions on IL-2 that would be epic, tank, train, ship etc simulator would be epic!

justme262

06-17-2012 02:06 AM

You didn't really think this through did you...

I used to play offline only and I after playing online I would certainly encourage everybody to try online. Real pilots are so much better than AI. But even online play need lots of AI to make it work.

LukeFF

06-17-2012 04:01 AM

I've heard of many half-baked ideas, but this one tops them all.

Furio

06-17-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeFF (Post 435537)

I've heard of many half-baked ideas, but this one tops them all.

Agreed. In Italy we use to say “frying air” to define discussing something totally removed from reality. But there is more. A simulator is software doing a simulation. It is its very nature to simulate everything: wind, grass, engines, gasoline properties, bullets, stonewalls, sea, beaches… Why on earth humans should not being simulated? The ultimate goal is exactly the opposite. If we had a really good human being simulation, then we could have not only crews, but also soldiers on the battlefield, and a really ultimate war simulation. We just need computers from year 2050…

BG-09

06-17-2012 09:28 AM

The war and combat decisions, and skils (flight skils) are result of human psichics. Thats why AI can not be compared to human. So only humans can simulate war, because war is human product.

I agree on this:

AI fits for: trains, ships.

But for pilots AI do not fits, because human abilities and behaiviour are unique apearance of the nature. They can not be simulated.

What abbout "historical" missions...well they are historical only in your mind.
Thats why i say: more human envolvment, and less AI.

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Page 3 of 5

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page