Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   So, You Think B for M looks like IL2 46? (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=30854)

ElAurens 04-01-2012 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ataros (Post 404815)
BoM map is not ready yet. It is a place-holder. No landscape variations, no houses, etc.

And yet it is still better looking than the original IL2 Russian maps.

:cool:

Mysticpuma 04-01-2012 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ataros (Post 404815)
BoM map is not ready yet. It is a place-holder.

Oh this made me laugh, it really did....do I have a feeling of Deja Vu?

Peaveywolf 04-01-2012 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by csThor (Post 404782)
If you look closely you'll notice that the houses are still the european town houses and not the russian rural buildings we've been shown. To me that indicates that the map is in its infancy, actually it has just wailed for the first time. Lots of things to do for the map makers.

I agree, I think its an unfinished map for purposes to show the aircraft models off on.

SlipBall 04-01-2012 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElAurens (Post 404822)
And yet it is still better looking than the original IL2 Russian maps.

:cool:



Not really, original had snow on roofs:-P:cool:

rga 04-01-2012 07:50 PM

I also heard a lot of complaining about CloD terrain before release, based purely on a handful of pictures Oleg gave us. Banana forum turned into the most active site of scientific debate about England's botanics and ecology. What's the situation now. I haven't seen a hate thread about CloD terrain for quite a while.
IMO, the combination of light, colour and models in CloD reach almost the photorealistic level. That's why I barely fly 1946 now, despite tons of interesting features made by TD and modders. Well, sometimes I do fly night mission in modded 1946, since the feeling hunting in the darkness is priceless.

Short version of my post: developers do not know how to make an aristic-touched screenshot :))

furbs 04-01-2012 07:53 PM

No arguments about the terrain now because some people told them it didn't look enough like England, so they changed it.

See sig.

kestrel79 04-01-2012 08:13 PM

Yes the CloD screenshot looks better. But it's the stuff you can't see that make Clod better. It's the awesome engine sounds, the insanely detailed damage model, the very deep CEM, flames coming from the engine exhaust (this still blows my mind). Add up all these things together and this is why that 2nd screenshot is the best :)

slm 04-01-2012 08:31 PM

Agree. When planes are moving fast, you don't necessarily notice 3d model details the same way you do from static screenshots. But the improved damage model, new effects like smoke from MGs when a plane is firing etc. clearly improve the game.

Still, it's advances that make AI planes fly better etc. that I appreciate most. If planes and ground units behave more realistically (as if a human player was controlling them), those mean more to me than more and more polygons. And of course playability features that allow creating better missions.

carguy_ 04-01-2012 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElAurens (Post 404758)
If you can't see the differences you are either blind or have an agenda.

Thank you for pointing that out. Some people seem to love to raise problems out of vacuum.

Jaws2002 04-02-2012 12:12 AM

While it does look better than the old Il-2, the changes in the graphics engine introduced in the last patch was a huge step back in how the lighting is used in the game.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...423_014013.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...shot107198.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.