Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Performance threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=195)
-   -   Realistic system specs (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=26986)

Oldschool61 11-03-2011 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timberwolf (Post 353682)
I running pretty much the same with a AMD CPU @2.7 XFX 5770 OC when needed. Duel channel 8 gigs
But i run everyting at high settings and 1024 x 784 i think it is on a 47 inch LCD TV
No lag or shutters

Hows it look with 10x7 res on a 47" screen??

Oldschool61 11-03-2011 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swiss (Post 354752)
What are the current specs Old?

My current specs are (just upgraded mobo/cpu/ram and OS

Win7 64
AMD Phenom II X4 840 (actually an athlon II X4 at 3.2ghz)
4Gigs DDR3
Evga GTS250 (bottle neck I know)
19" flat tube CRT

anyone have a system close to this playing CloD??

I figure I can probably play at 1024 x 768 with most settings on medium if lucky

rummy63 11-20-2011 11:55 PM

Will this system run COD smoothly?
 
I would like to play COD, but I would like to know if my system can play COD in the current, under-optimized version of the game. I am running:

Windows 64-Bit Home Premium
Intel i5-2500K @ 3.30 Ghz - not overclocked, yet
Asus P8P67PRO B3 Revision
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 1 TB - will upgrade to SLI
8 GB 1333 Kingston RAM
WD Corsair Black 1 TB
Corsair TX 850 Power Supply
Realtek High-Definition onboard sound

Fossil-Goz 11-21-2011 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rummy63 (Post 363271)
I would like to play COD, but I would like to know if my system can play COD in the current, under-optimized version of the game. I am running:

Windows 64-Bit Home Premium
Intel i5-2500K @ 3.30 Ghz - not overclocked, yet
Asus P8P67PRO B3 Revision
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 1 TB - will upgrade to SLI
8 GB 1333 Kingston RAM
WD Corsair Black 1 TB
Corsair TX 850 Power Supply
Realtek High-Definition onboard sound

Rummy,

I have a system close to your specs and i'm happily running COD. The big difference in mine is that I use a Solid State Drive for my OS & COD and I have never installed any of the beta patches.

Timberwolf 11-21-2011 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldschool61 (Post 357736)
Hows it look with 10x7 res on a 47" screen??

Awsome When i do play I even have 3 IR Leds for freetracker just haven't set it up yet ..looking at wi contorlers and Eyetoy to make it work better
Gameplay for me looks great but having a hardtime with Joystick settings and getting the aircraft to fly flat and normal I have the Trim on for up and down but the engine pull sucks so bad that i don't play to much offline and i think once online ...seems every sever is max engine controls and settings so really its a game thats nice to look at but not much more then that .. I use to play fighter ace for hours and hours .. Now its Battlefield3 and Arma2

Hoping to run a Asus CROSSFIRE V motherboard and AMD 8 core for Xmas

AKA_Tenn 11-22-2011 02:50 AM

I have a P8Z68-V pro, i7 2600k@4.5GHz, GTX570HD, G.skill ripjaws 8GB ram, with max graphics except for takeoff and landing i always get more than 30 fps

and the problems you're having with ur stick aren't anything to do with cliffs of dover... it has everything to do with the fact that fighter ace is your flying experiance... if you had played il2 1946, rise of flight, fsx, etc... before coming to this it wouldn't be re-learning how to fly... just learning how to do the fancy combat stuff without frying ur engine... and aim...

and i would recommend getting the i5 2500k (make sure it has a k) and if you're going to get a new videocard get an nvidia card at least a gtx560ti but a pair of them would be better... or a single 580

the reason I got the gtx570 is because it has 2.5Gb vram, and i couldn't see paying 100$ more for 10% performance the 580 would give me...
and the reason i recomend the 2500k over the 2600k is because the 2500k can easily be overclocked to the same speed as the 2600k or 2700k, it just doesn't have hyper-threading and has a smaller cache, those two things don't matter, but might help in longevity.

but until ati steps it up a notch, nvidia/intel is the way to go... since amd/ati went 8 cores... in a world of single threaded appz...

take the benchmarks below with a grain of salt, since the benchmark is multi-threaded, and 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of appz are single threaded. (or use less than 4 cores)
http://s8.postimage.org/3mlkm3pur/cpu_benchmarks.jpg

http://s7.postimage.org/5kq16bpi1/cpu_benchmarks.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.