Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   R.I.Pee -F-S-X- (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=22766)

Korn 05-11-2011 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SsSsSsSsSnake (Post 281749)
isnt there asome software that alows shooting stuff now? thought i saw an advert some months ago?

VRS TacPack but it's not out yet. Looking good though.

SsSsSsSsSnake 05-11-2011 05:44 PM

thankyou Korn

Blackdog_kt 05-11-2011 06:52 PM

I've logged some hours on a friend's PC, we even did a 10-hour VOR to VOR flight from Bahamas to St.Marten in the Aerosoft Catalina over the course of 2-3 evenings (taking turns on the controls and using the mid-flight save feature).

I liked it a lot and it taught me much about CEM.

That being said, i can't compare it with CoD. They are fundamentally different in many of the things they try to do and especially, the amount of budget involved, add-on pricing and availability of 3rd party add-ons (payware and freeware alike). A single aircraft in FSX can be as much as the entire package of CoD and not all payware FSX add-ons are that good to justify the price (although the ones that are good really stand out and give you tons of immersion and satisfaction when you manage to start flying them correctly).

It's just that CoD is still too young and frequent beta patches create a much varied user base in regards to the versions used, that's why every other sim has more avenues to get extra content from and CoD multiplayer has not picked up yet. It was the same with FSX too, it took some time until people moved over from FS9, it's just the natural progression of how things go.

Eldur 05-11-2011 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smink1701 (Post 281704)
I think FSX is great. The graphics are far below Cliffs but most everything else is superior...overall immersion, stability, the missions, SOUND, etc.

Not the FMs... and the performance :D

SsSsSsSsSnake 05-11-2011 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jojimbo (Post 281725)
FSX,GEX,UTX,RTX > CoD anyday.
plus you can fly anywhere in the world,
there are literally thousands of mods,

I think your probably thinking this way because
there is no combat in FSX, because if there were,
no one would be playing flat maps like this game.

Luthier, your next project....a moddable globe to build upon
would ensure domination for IL2 period.

Zephyr?:)

Kakashi 05-11-2011 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raaaid (Post 281697)
"As for the ocean, I'd say they both the same kind of... And in both I really hate to see clouds and airplanes being reflected so nicely on completely disturbed water... Looks nice, but VERY unrealistic"

i noticed that normally you dont see the sun as an sphere in the sea

but how small does it light have to be so it gets bounced off staright?

If a light is to small chances are you probably don't see it reflect, or merely just a spark for an instant. Talking about my experience anyways.
And even when the sea is extremely calm, there are ALWAYS gonna be little waves every now and then which disforms the reflection. I have already seen lights (from a tower/ building ) being reflected off seemingly calm sea as a long line accross the sea. But anyways my point is: It looks nice, but it sure as heck ain't realistic at ALL!


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.