Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - Stability and Control characteristics of the Early Mark Spitfires

Page 26 of 94

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- FM/DM threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=196)

- - Stability and Control characteristics of the Early Mark Spitfires (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=33245)

CaptainDoggles

07-20-2012 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 447030)

A child would be able to read to paragraph 5, unlike yourself it appears.

I read the entire article. Are you denying that a stable aircraft can be maneuverable?

Al Schlageter

07-20-2012 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles (Post 447023)

Just like Sandstone pointed out above: Everyone thinks that maneuverability requires instability. That is false, and even the US Navy says so.

Otherwise, they would not have described the T-45 as "very stable yet fully maneuverable". A child can understand this.

Sure it has to able to maneuver. It is not a V1 and flies one direction only.

fruitbat

07-20-2012 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles (Post 447037)

I read the entire article. Are you denying that a stable aircraft can be maneuverable?

no, not at all, but i agree with the US Navy when they say in paragraph 5,

Quote:

In a word, the relationship of longitudinal stability to maneuverability is inverse. As one increases, the other decreases and vice versa.

are you denying them?

CaptainDoggles

07-20-2012 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 447040)

no, not at all

Cool, glad we agree that a maneuverable aircraft does not require negative stability.

fruitbat

07-20-2012 09:23 PM

I'll ask again Doggles,

Quote:

In a word, the relationship of longitudinal stability to maneuverability is inverse. As one increases, the other decreases and vice versa.

are you denying them?

CaptainDoggles

07-20-2012 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 447044)

I'll ask again Doggles

You're in bongodriver's squad, right? Nope, I won't be debating with you.

If someone else wants to ask me that question I'll maybe discuss things with that person.

Have a nice day!

fruitbat

07-20-2012 09:27 PM

ahhh, didn't answer the question, huge surprise, silence speaks volumes.

for the record, because we're in the same squad, doesn't mean we agree on everything.:rolleyes:

CaptainDoggles

07-20-2012 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 447048)

ahhh, didn't answer the question, huge surprise, silence speaks volumes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doggles

If someone else wants to ask me that question I'll maybe discuss things with that person.

Quote:

for the record, because we're in the same squad, doesn't mean we agree on everything.:rolleyes:

Yeah I agree, I don't like him either. He reflects very poorly on your squad's reputation.

Have a nice day!

fruitbat

07-20-2012 09:38 PM

wow, you're mature.

kindergarten stuff.

not saying much for JG13 yourself mate.

NZtyphoon

07-20-2012 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles (Post 447050)

--

Yeah I agree, I don't like him either. He reflects very poorly on your squad's reputation.

Have a nice day!

Okay, if you ain't interested in answering fruitbat's question 'cos you don't like bongodriver I'll ask;

Do you agree with the statement

"In a word, the relationship of longitudinal stability to maneuverability is inverse. As one increases, the other decreases and vice versa." ?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Page 26 of 94

« First

Last »

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page