Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)

- - Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY - For 4.11 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=18260)

I hate imageshack !!!

Wait please...

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 227024)

Well... we have flares with other planes too, so I see no reason, why it shouldn't be implemented (I suppose it was used during the whole war) - even more, if we are going to expand the nightfighting scenario.

I think, such general armament options aren't as critical as planes (regarding 1C and CoD).

Sorry for the quote, but I am really puzlled about which planes have flares on 4.101.

But if you are really on it, I may ask for them to be visible from far up on clear skyes. Something around 10000m perhaps... Normal lights and fires on il2 don't show that far away. The 10000 mark on the assumption that I must see the flares not only directly from above, but at least from a 45º position at 7000m.

Now, also on flares, they were used as formations signaling, better understood than any radio chatter. They were fired from the cockpit with a flare hand gun. This would be far more apropriate than people firing smoke, or using landing lights on full daylight as a signaling method. Flares are limited on availability as ammunition, and hangs around for a while suspendend on parachutes before flaming out.

Interesting suggestions. :)

However, I'm not sure about which planes all have flares... but I know, that at least the Letov biplane has.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 228815)

Interesting suggestions. :)

However, I'm not sure about which planes all have flares... but I know, that at least the Letov biplane has.

The Swordfish has flares as well IIRC..

Probably is silly, but can TD include Freetrack support? Just include a freetrack=1 and use the FreeTrackClient.dll instead of Trackir or 1C can't include any other device that is not TrackIR? (please avoid any comment that it works right now, I know...)

thanks
Alberto

Will we ever see Mark II GGS gyro gunsight in later model Spitfires ? Not to mention Griffon powered ones...?

Cant. Z.1007 bis!

I would really like to fly in a Z.1007bis!
I remember there was a cockpit made by someone ... somewhere ... ;)

It's a real beauty; today I tried to fly it on externals only, and it seems a good performer, and quite fast for a bomber.
And it's very cool looking.

Some pictures:
http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/ca...tz1007_230.jpg

http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/ca...z1007_210a.jpg

http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2...onebiscopi.jpg

And a great video here, where you can see nice footages of Z.1007 in action (even if made for propaganda...) Gunners firing, etc etc...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrl0II-wsM

Cheers
Rick

Strange because OLEG MADDOX not put in CoD the CANT1007 bis?
this airplane bomber go to belgium whit the:
this is CAI in battle of brittain
Aircraft
Fiat CR.42 of 18° Gruppo, 56° Stormo. The Italian CR.42 was a manoeuvrable and fast biplane fighter. Despite its good manoeuvrability and speed (440+ km/h) it was technically outclassed by the faster Hurricane and Spitfire of the British Royal Air Force.
Fiat G.50 of 20° Gruppo, 56° Stormo. The Italian G.50 monoplane fighter was restricted by its range of 400 miles (640 km) (roughly the same as that of Bf 109E models used by the Luftwaffe) and the lack of a radio unit in most participating aircraft.
Fiat BR.20 bombers of 13° and 43° Stormo. The Italian BR.20 was a twin engined bomber capable of carrying 1600 kg (3,528 lb) of bombs.
Supporting aircraft included five CANT Z.1007 used for reconnaissance and Caproni Ca.133 transport planes.
this is Caproni Ca.133
http://www.century-of-flight.net/Avi...images5/88.jpg