This is what I said

We came on head to head(E-4 and IIa)
I got the advantage on the IIa but lost him.

He got the advantage on me. I did some definitive moves and lost him.
But he never got on my 6 after that he got the heck out of there because he know that I had him and one lucky shot as I'v been told he would have been out.


Why do you say I out ran him? That's not what I said.

I did said > have fun shooting down the under powered Spitfires.

+1 to what cheese said!

We should organize a 1v1 server to prove the truth.
5 or 10 km apart, at the same speed, same altitude start toward each other. First meeting is free to shoot or not. This decision should be made. The server is password protected, and the dogfights organizing on chat. Whoever is inside, can follow the fights by external view. I fly Spit II very gladly, against anyone who says that the 109 can shoot it down. 8-) Or even Spit I it also prove that it is not a bad AC, as claimed. :rolleyes:

Please do it, make a gentleman passby (dont shoot in headon and start turning as soon as wintips passed each other). I BET real money on the 109 being defeated in no time, no matter the pilot given the Spit pilot is no greenhorn.

Winger

I never argued that the I and Ia AND hurri are not right.......................
So is the 109..........................
But given that they STILL offer a balance in performance like its seemingly right even historicalwise.
I told that advantages to disadvantages now several times and am tired to over and over repeat myself.

Winger

Winger sorry not a personnel attack here but It's hard to under stand what you mean.
I do not think your English is very good. Or you do a lot of double talk.
As far as setting up a server to fly the IIa and the E-4 there are already servers that have both.
Join in and have at it. lol

Yes LOL:P Obviously you dont get it. But definately not because of my english. (i admit its not my motherlanguage and therefor no the best)
Btw. Its not your motherlanguage as well right:)?

Winger

that post screams for evidence!i would suggest that someone who is used to fly british fighters, takes a spitII and fights against you in a E4 on a closed server.both starting at the same alt and speed.if i would have ever flown a spit in cliffs of dover, i would volunteer for that experiment.
...but i bet that its only a matter of seconds until you end up in the crosshair...

I don't doubt you and I predict that if I was in the Spit against an Ace in the E4 I would lose. I know I've said this before but all talk of historical accuracy and balance has to include pilots of different abilities. Doesn't it?

Obviously I do get it.
You do not want the IIa in any server because you like to make yourself feel good by shooting down the under powered Spitfires.

The IIa was a better fighter then the 109 in a dog fight. did that mean thy never got shot down no.
When I first got into MP I knew that the Spitfires where not what thy should be.
I was told by the 109 pilots that it was not the plane but that the 109 pilots where better then the Spitfire pilots and the 109 where modeled right.

Now we hear that the 109 are not right.

When a pilot went out on his own during the war thy would be in big trouble if thy made it back with out being jumped by a group of enemy planes.

When thy talk about advantage thy where talking about numbers.

The 109 pilots would take on the IIa if and only if thy had the numbers to do so because thy knew it was a better plane.

What are you going to do when thy make the FM of the I and Ia fly like thy should?