some little bits and pieces.
 

First I'd like to thank TD for all their hard work and dedication in keeping Il-2/FB a very fine game with all this excellent new content.

Can you guys please check the armament of the H8K1 'Emily' if you have a moment?
Currently it seems to have a mix of MG-151/20 and MG-81(!)
I know that there are better simulators for IJN weapons as the G4M1 seems somewhat more acceptable in this manner... (MG-FF/M & .303 Browning?)

Toughening up the big (4 engine) bombers a bit might not go astray either.
I've been shooting down B-17(F&G)s in IAR-80 (4x rifle calibre mg) lately which shouldn't be that easy, surely??? Aim between the engines and even rcmg will light them up quite quickly. It is like they have no fuel tank protection at all. :o
I'm trying to replicate these results with IAR-80 vs Pe-8 but they seem harder to light up and of course 20mm ShVAK in the face is also a problem too! ;)

Cheers!

- Having an option to see all icons in white (or the same color) when radar is active. Friend /Foe identification is just too detailed.

- A system that registers attacks on ships so that the kills for big ships can be shared.

- A Flyable Japanese torpedo bomber

- Possibility to select different formations for flights in FMB.

- Revised Ground Attack routine for attack/jabos/fighters. They make long turns before attacking and abandon the target before destroyed, even if they still have ammo.

- I know this is too much, but some kind of evasive maneuvers for ships would be great.

Just wishing. Thx for all.

So, we can forget about light bombs? Or not?

Not sure, what you mean (if you posted it already in this thread, just give me a link... I didn't read every page personally). :rolleyes:

This only effects the dynamic campaigns but its happened to me more than enough.

Our sqd improves over missions and then gets gutted by stupidity.

two things. On big missions all aircraft involved are landing at the same airfield. I am sure this happened sometimes, but not always. Getting into that crazy pattern with the fighters and bombers is a mess. Some way to sort that out more would be nice, or have the fighters go to one airfield and the bombers another.

The other is some sort of priority would be cool. The flight might have damaged/smoking/losing fuel planes and they go in the pattern the same as anyone else. A form of priority would be cool. Damaged planes landing first. Another thing would be to have all friendly airfields available. Not active per say but available. Flying back with a wingman who is badly damaged it would be cool to be able to send a message to land at the nearest friendly airfield. This might save some of the pilots who should not get killed but do because they tend to fly all the way back and then go into the pattern and eventually crash into trees.

One more thing:

Having external views while on ground/dead, or to see friendly aircraft only, is a great addition for the ones who fly coop missions (me and my squad for one).

'US' was used by 56 Sqdn in the European theatre.

Was the 1 Sdn RAAF 'US' only used in the Pacific?

U.S.A. army enter in europe from gibraltar and from north of France(dd-day) Two way of enter in europe ww2 conflict.
What is the third way? From Ejipt (canal of suez) or from BORDEAUX whest of france and u boat italy base?

Oh, sorry) I meant "illuminating" or "flare" bombs. In ohter words - bombs for an illumitaing or a targets marking in night time. Not sure what is their right name in English. In German it sounds "Leuchtbombe", in russian "SAB" or "САБ" - "светящая авиационная бомба". See here - http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=161

First the US/British Armies invaded North Africa (1) and after they (and the British 8th Army from the East) drove the Axis out through Tunisia the Allied armies then invaded Sicily (2) from North Africa and on into Italy. Later they invaded Normandy, D-Day (3).

Does that answer your question?