Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Friday update and discussions 2011-02-25 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=18904)

stigkk 02-26-2011 11:05 PM

The author of "The last enemy" Richard Hillary, always flew without goggles because it made him feel claustrophobic. Much to his regret later as he suffered severe burns to his face.

Richie 02-26-2011 11:08 PM

Does anyone know if there is "Ingame saturation control"

Blakduk 02-26-2011 11:50 PM

Regarding the pictures of the stabiliser shadows on the 109's- they were not fixed completely to the tail section. They could be tilted to trim the aircraft- as i understand it they were not adjustable in-flight, and could only be set by groundcrew. I think the shadow gap is overdone but it is not apparent on the models of the other planes (such as the Spits and Hurricanes).
The problem of floating elements on smaller parts such as the exhaust covers and aerial masts is definitely there, as illustrated by the excellent examples posted by Major_setback, but the 109 stabilisers shadow gaps is partly due to the design of the real aircraft and therefore the true-to-life computer model.

Blackdog_kt 02-27-2011 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caveman (Post 228381)
Surprised noone has said more about the water in shot 3... The oil smoke is fantastic, but the water is what appears to be the best in ANY sim. Better than all the addons for FSX... Incredible.

It looks like water!

We're so busy looking at the aircraft that we miss a lot of stuff i guess. And yes, it does look like a photo of choppy seas ;)


Another little detail well spotted:
Quote:

Originally Posted by major_setback (Post 228409)
I'm happy to see markings with weathering today! :-)

I think that until this is experienced in motion and for some considerable length of time to allow us to digest it (either in a high-res, promotional video going over the features in some depth or on our own PCs) we won't be able to really grasp how good it looks...there's just so much detail to overload on :grin:



On the issue of pilot size
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper117 (Post 228471)
I've just looked at about a dozen 109 photos of early 109 E3's, the dimensions don't look far out at all.. then compare pictures of a later version with the newer heavier framed cockpit, say the E4 and later variants, and then yes, you may be forgiven for thinking they have it wrong.. I don't think it's such a 'glaring' error at all. :)

I think you're on to something here. There's much less framing and even lack of armor glass in most of those E3s, which gives a more spacious look to it. The real life photos of early 109Es posted by others seem to give a similar impression.

To be perfectly honest with you all, i can't really decide. Sometimes and from certain angles they look a tad small, but in other screenshots they look just perfect. All in all, i'm not too worried about it and i'd rather have a bit of a smaller pilot that moves and might possibly be used to signal other players when flying online, rather than have a 100% anatomically correct one and have to choose between him clipping through the fuselage or having him as a static figure.


Finally, i'd also like to second the request for some details on multi-engined/multi-crewed aircraft. If the crew AI is good enough to make the aircraft not feel "empty" and they can be interacted with and be useful via certain commands, i'm sure i'll be spending a lot of time in heavier aircraft.

All in all, excellent progress as usual and i can't wait to fly this.

philip.ed 02-27-2011 10:15 AM

Test Pilot Geoffrey Page had his groundcrew make him up a full-face visor comletely out of cellulid, in the hope that it would provide clear visibility (rather like the visors firemen wear today). Unfortunately, the mark III series of goggles had their lenses made from celluloid too, and it distorted vision and scratched easily. With a visor completly made out of the stuff, Page found that it 'burned beautifully' (in his own words) as well when he was shot down in flames during the BoB. Rather ironic really. He recovered though, and always wore a pair of issue goggles on his head, although thankfully he never had need to use them.

Pilots didn't like wearing goggles; they did affect visibility, and were really uncomfortable.

Abbeville-Boy 02-27-2011 01:32 PM

cool calendar
only 3 more weeks

stu babes 02-27-2011 02:23 PM

ive just been told its out in april now,,,,,is that correct,,,,,and if it is when is?
 
:evil:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abbeville-Boy (Post 228971)
cool calendar
only 3 more weeks


Richie 02-27-2011 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abbeville-Boy (Post 228971)
cool calendar
only 3 more weeks

Brings back 2001 IL-2 memories while playing the demo together.

undercut 02-27-2011 08:14 PM

Thanks again for the update m8. I just gotta ask, what are the chances of us getting to see a video of dog fights in one of these updates before the release?

DoolittleRaider 02-27-2011 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strike (Post 228400)
For Olegs team, and us fans...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9YVei2Yb_k

Quote:

Originally Posted by kancerosik (Post 228519)
do u think that the medium high of te te population during the 30s and 40s decades is equal to the pressent days? (supposing that the video is from 1980 ;) )
Pd: that pilot is really tall

My impression is that Adolph Galland was not exceptionally tall…seemingly of average height…yet the Bf109 is a bit of a tight fit as seen in this often seen Film Clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMWEmg-P_m4


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.