Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 20 of 39 « First 101819 20 212230 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Controls threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=194)
-   -   Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=18723)

LoBiSoMeM 02-21-2011 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 226760)
Its the way some alternative headtracking go about what they do, which is the problem.
He's a deaf broken record. Amazing!

Wolf_Rider 02-21-2011 04:00 PM
and you wonder why there are problems with inclusion...

norulz 02-21-2011 04:08 PM
I don't think it's amazing... rather pathetic. Only a direct interest in keeping the "face" of NP clean at all costs would go to such ridiculous extent of fighting obvious till bitter end.

What a pathetic way of earning your daily salami...

Wolf_Rider 02-21-2011 04:10 PM
I'm not the one fighting though ;)

SEE 02-21-2011 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 226760)
The thing you seem to be not aware of See, is no-one really is against the inclusion of alternative headtracking... this has been the consensus since very early in the piece.
Its the way some alternative headtracking go about what they do, which is the problem.
I totally agree W-R and that is an honest POV I share. I use FT mainly because it has hot keys to enable/disable any unwanted axis in flight and these are on my POV. I also have TIR but it doesn't have 6 axis hot key support. (I posted on the TIR forum and asked if it could be included at some point). This is why FT is my preferred choice and why it works well in IL2 + 6DOF.

I would like everyone to use their kit in CoD. But if not - then players will have to upgrade, find a work around, not buy CoD and complain to the Devs/publishers. If FT isn't included, there will be a reason. Wether that is made known, only time will tell.

Wolf_Rider 02-21-2011 04:55 PM
its nice when people see eye to eye, eh?


If a "workaround" can be achieved without infringement... great
If a need for certain features, or changes/ additions made, can be achieved by making a considered approach to the party concerned (ie working with them)... great

Threats of "not to buy" however, has become cliche.

CharveL 02-22-2011 03:16 PM
Just wanted to chime in and say nice job WR for keeping a logical and calm discussion against the wave of misplaced rabid fanboism.

I think the personal attacks on you do more to harm whatever convoluted rationalizations they're trying to make anyway but watching their meltdowns does have a rubbernecker kind of morbid appeal.

norulz 02-22-2011 04:34 PM
lol

the pathetic martyr of NP... he's pure soul claimed victory against Mount Obvious.

...let's drink


in a related news... here are some... let's not call them names :D... that are now welcoming "hackers"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12531127

he he heeee...

Wolf_Rider 02-22-2011 08:01 PM
go and make your own Kinect then ;) and the article refers to the MS Kinect SDK (soon to be released)

julian265 02-22-2011 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharveL (Post 227085)
Just wanted to chime in and say nice job WR for keeping a logical and calm discussion...
It's always good to start the working day with a laugh. Thanks.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18 AM.
Page 20 of 39 « First 101819 20 212230 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.