![]() |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
The picture has been explained with more detail some two pages back, this thread. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Tihi, I suggest if you want people to listen to your issues then you provide quantifiable data or a series of pilot reports - and much more than one - that backup your arguments or that at least point to a common extrapolated outcome. Currently you come here with nothing more than opinions delivered with a exasperating sense of melodrama and an irritatingly belittling attitude towards the guys at Team Diadalos - you win no friends and thusly make any chance that your grievances might be even investigated, let alone fixed, marginal at best. |
Quote:
the rest of the spit characteristics are fine imo, the aileron fix is appreciated and it seems... well, it seems to give more warning of a stall, and require flying properly. as this is the case, will "spitnoob" become a phrase of the past?! |
Quote:
Quote:
You say in a previous post 'there is NO behavior AT ALL which indicates pitch instability. The a/c does NOT tighten up in turns..' For the 'turn tightening' to appear, CG has to be BEHIND the plane AC, which would make the plane completely uncontrollable- ie. instable in the absolute sense. If that s your criterion for where the bad stability and handling begins, please better avoid flying your designs yourself:) And if you see 'no pitch instabillity at all' here, then am not going to waste any more time explaining. I wrote enough in the thread. "They showed us all a pic of a modern day restored Spitfire flying in formation with a photo a/c at low airspeed with significant down elevator deflection." How on earth do you find this a proof of anything else, but the Spit having the movable elevators? Next second the elevators could 've been in another position. Or do you beleive formating pilots have orders against moving their controls? Regarding the belittling attitudes, etc, please refer to your posts here. As for the TD, their job are not anyone's grievances; they took over modifying an FM in an acceptable manner. |
Quote:
The neutral trim point of the elevator trim can be set by the pilot in game, so I don't think it matters much. I just trim it down a lot on take off and then have more fun flying the thing than I ever had before. |
Quote:
Could you find any such data on the heavy trimming necessary on the Spitfire, from a British source? Like the spitfireperformance site, for example? Engineers have been known of mounting the things upside down on unfamiliar foreign equipment, you know.:) Any trimming increases drag, reducing speed. Not irrelevent to a transport, you see. :) Ahm, what's this: ' "It happened that Wright Field had the only Spitfire in America-a Mark V. Unfortunately almost every pilot in the Air Corps had had a go on her and like a car that had too many drivers, she was the worse for wear...'She was very tired, very sloppy-she'd had the guts caned out of her all right." NACA got it for testing after that.' http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtop...91603&start=15 Hmm? How about looking at the sources that say the things you may not like , too :)? |
Quote:
JtD - as for neutral trim point being settable in game, how would i go about doing this, or do you just mean dialing in trim for straight and level and that is the neutral point? |
Quote:
This is one reason for 'flying tails', too. Accordingly, it would have been quite sloppy from Supermarine to deliver such a plane NACA is talking about. It would mean the drag in order to neutralize the wing-lift moment (trim drag) is higher than neccessary. |
Quote:
Having seen some of the comments from TD since 4.10 came out, my understanding is that the other n00b uberwarbirds in the game will be served with the same/similar treatment in 4.11 or future releases. I think they would have liked to fix these others as well but TD has limited resources, so it may wind up being only one uberwarbird at a time getting fixed (the spitfire just had the bad/good luck to be the first to get fixed). I also know that DT is painstaking in their compliance to the available references and will not make a change unless new reference material becomes available. To those of you who are complaining about the spits in 4.10/4.10.1, your best, only hope is to find a verifiable document from a relevant authority that outlines any change you think should be applied. Submit these respectfully to DT and I'm sure you will see something come of it. I personally think (as do many here) that the 4.09 spit needed to be fixed (hence the "spitnoob" name-calling) and that DT has done a masterful job of it. It still sucks to get owned by LA-7 drivers and such online but I have a feeling they are about to get a short drop back to reality as well :). Cheers DT and thanks for another masterpiece, Fafnir_6 P.S. Much about the content of upcoming DT patches can be revealed when a DT member posts here. I'd advise anyone with an interest in such things to PAY ATTENTION when someone like Viikate, FC99 or Caspar posts in these forums, the future will reveal itself (it also helps to be respectful and friendly towards our patchmakers). Il-2 4.11 is gonna rule :). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.