![]() |
startrekmike would say to that, "stop attacking people".
Me however? I would say, "you might you're ahead of the pack, but in reality you're wallowing in a place you refer to as; Quote:
|
Quote:
You've been used to being a protected species on the old il2 Forum. But here you're not. Get used to it. Every time you try to throw your digital weight around here, I will be here to respond. That was a big post you made. Hurting? Yawn...... Best Regards, MB_Avro. |
Quote:
I think most did to differentiate from Call of Duty |
Quote:
|
I have a feeling that this thread will vanish, in fact, I hope it does.
I don't get it, we are all here for the same thing and yet there always seems to be a thread or two running on this board that continues the same circular arguments, posturing and finger pointing. Well, lets hope that by the time I post this, the mods will have deleted this one also, it has gotten out of control, personal opinions about products are one thing, belittling and dividing the player base is another. How long has this kind of stuff been going on here? How long can it continue? |
Quote:
If you can't help your self and have to respond to comments made, try ignoring the people whos post you find annoying. The forum has that feature for a reason. Some people have the attitude that they have to win a point when posting on a forum. This is of course complete rubbish. There are no winners and no loosers. Just opinions and people are entitled to those. Personally if I find a persons opinions repulsive, in real life I wouldn't associate with them or communicate with them. In my opinion on-line is no different. |
Quote:
I think the term was coined by haters to denigrate the sim. But just like Lord Haw Haw found when he used the term 'Desert Rats' as a put down, the men that he directed it at took it to heart and used it as a honorific. I personally use the term CoD. But seening how I've only played Call of Duty 3 times I don't associate the sim with the FPS. |
So far the new il-2 forum has been a pleasant place to visit. I hope the more rigorous moderation will continue and that it will help re-educate the community and teach them to conduct themselves better. I don't know why the moderation here has been so very poor for so many years. Whether it was laziness, personal agendas, or whether they just weren't sophisticated enough to make good decisions. Whatever the reason, there is ample evidence to show that they have failed in their duties. The degree of bullying, slander and relentless goading that goes on daily here is truly shameful. The forum seems to bring out the worst in every personality, and not a single one of us is free of blame for that. I'm just as dismayed by the demise of Cliffs' as anybody else, but one upshot of the entire debacle is that we might one day be able to put this place behind us.
|
Re-educate as in a re-education camp?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reeducation_camp Quote:
It would be better if people behaived in an appropriate manner without the need of a big stick. I have no complaints against any of the moderators at this site. It is a awful job and I would be loathed to do it. All praise to them that stood up and took on the responsibility. Quote:
|
Quote:
I can quit any time, honest... :shifty expression: |
Quote:
What you fail to realizes is that from my perspective.. I have no "digital weight" to throw around ... here or elsewhere. If there is one lesson I learned very well being a moderator at UBI for as long as I was it is that all this internet "weight" you speak of is an illusion. It is meaningless.. it comes and it goes.. and it has no bearing on who you are .. unless you "toss it around" as you say.. in a way that signifies that you have no respect for others and thereby no self respect.. I serve on the IL2 boards because as I said in another thread.. I was raised to kick in.. I was raised to contribute and serve where you can in the capacity that you can.. and I was raised to pay your way.. and if someone else pays your way .. then that means you have to pay someone else's way.. Paying it forward is a rule I try to live by.. So I am glad to be able to get in on the ground floor engaging in a hobby that I have a great deal of passion for and get a great deal of pleasure from and continue to be in a position to keep my ear to the ground and look forward to what's coming down the pike. I have wanted to get to the next level for a long time.. and so far nothing has manged to scratch that itch.. Hopefully that will change in 12-23 months .. give or take.. .. and as for you "being here to respond" ... LOL.. well OK Avro.. You go right on and respond however you like .. for what it is worth.. I was taken aback by my initial reception here .. but now that I know the rules.. I can play.. but I will not get into a battle of wits with unarmed men. You go right on and protect this place from me and my evil machinations.. As I said in another thread... I have a wife of 24 years going through menopause, I have 7 kids and 8 grandkids.. There is NOTHING that you or anyone else on this forum or anywhere else can say or do to shake me.. ESPECIALLY not here.. now that I know what I am dealing with... soo you go on and keep watch there Officer Dibble.. I'm going to go look for some pikinik baskets.. Oh and thank you for your compliment on my post.. I do aim to please. |
Quote:
If they had clamped down really hard a year ago there would have been a backlash with (some) people complaining of over-zealousness and blocking of free speech. Maybe with hindsight (?) that would have been a price worth paying? But I don't think it would have changed the final outcome. Quote:
When logic doesn't work and when they won't stop trying to shove you around it is finally time to start pushing back in the same manner they use... or walk away completely...something that may yet be the best idea. |
Quote:
There is this "re-educate" thing again... I don't know what it is with people and their insistence that others must be re-educated (or made to see the one point of view), as the very worst countries on Earth all had re-education on their books. How, some say, the more we forget the past, the more we are doomed to repeat that past. There was this country in central Europe which tried it pre and during WWII along with another small country to the south, there was another larger country, to the east, which tried it a few decades earlier whilst going through a revolution. Someone mentioned a S.E.Asian country bunging it on in the 70's... well there was another country to the west of that one which also did it, and opened up entire fields for the end result. To the north of those two is another large country trying it on again today. A certain 'church' also tried it a couple of centuries ago, and man did they have the tools to do it with! As well, there is another "church" also trying it on today. The mindset of "making" people see only the one point of view IS WRONG! Quote:
the aim of that tactic is to have "dissenters" walk away |
Quote:
Do you have any game questions, you seem to be here just to let off some steam :lol: |
not allowed to do that OTR, they get banned for it, lol :)
|
Quote:
Or to put it bluntly: Behave, or face the consequences. Forums on the 'net has never been, is not and will never be a democracy. ALL of them are dictatorships in one form or another, and you accept that when you create your account and when you log into them. Free speech does NOT exist on a forum, although that's something many people utterly forget or don't bother realizing. In my opinion, the moderators should have been way harsher in removing those that cannot or will not behave and post in a sensible manner. At this point it's not even worth discussing, as most of the posts on this forum has long since outlived their usefulness apart from a historical record of a game that had impossibly high expectations facing it from the community. |
define: "In a sensible manner" for us, if you would please Fjordmonkey, as you mean it to be
also, if you would, please define: "free speech" yes, people are very much entitled to have their point of view, as much as they are also entitled to not have that (another) point of view rammed down their throats... they are also entitled not to be called names. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My point is that unless people can behave, they should be punished. The main problem for any moderator is to be consistent about what acceptable behavior is, and to be consistent in the punishment of transgressors. |
okay.....
"A sensible manner = a manner where people that may have vastly different points of view can still manage to discuss the good and bad sides of the coin from both sides in an adult fashion, without letting emotion bleed into it, without namecalling, without being attacked for having a different point of view than the other side. How that be, when you consider some people to be "small-minded, foul-mouthed and frothing trolls"? doesn't that very premise negate your position? I already have several different interpretations of what "free speech" is, Fjordmonkey. I was asking you for yours... but to save a lot of grief, I'll just cut the chase and offer "calling people names", just inhibits their right to free speech through intimidation. |
personally i rather the anarchy at rof forums(not banning not to lose potential customers)
you get to see peoples real face not like bos forums where people SEEM civilized the person who i got to admire and love the most was piersjaeger he was so civilized he could not be from this time edit: im the perfect example of a person using freedom of speech,(had the nazis won i would be in a gulag) to which some people insulting me think theyre using theirs |
so here is where you guys come to when dumped from the vaporized threads... :mrgreen:
|
Quote:
@ Kendo .. You are correct... being a mod is a thankless task under certain circumstances but my philosophy is .. If I am going to be maligned for doing my job as amoderator then I would much rather be makigned by those who are behaving in a manner and treating people in a fashion that I would prefer not to. On the flipnside if I am going to be considered fair I would prefer to be considered fair by people who actually understand what fairness actually is. |
Quote:
Quote:
My interpretation of what free speech actually happens to be on an internet board is irrelevant, since there IS no free speech on a forum like this. Asking me what my definition is in regards to real life is equally irrelevant, since that doesn't have any bearings on what happens here. But since you asked, I'll answer: Personally, I think that free speech is nonexistent, since unless you can't, in any country of the world, say absolutely anything you want without being punished for it. |
Ok
enough is enough Please note any more threads started here regarding moderation on other forums and discussions of moderation decisions will be deleted and the member given an infraction or banned. If a thread is started regarding the above and replied to before moderation is applied, all involved will receive infractions or bans. Thanks |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.