Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Development Update - September 16, 2011 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=26251)

David198502 09-18-2011 01:25 PM

thx for the update.
its good to be in touch with the devs.
i dont understand why so many people are moaning about the 3d implementation?
im sure the devs are well aware of the other problems, which are obviously more important than this feature.but i dont think that the 3d feature somehow disturbes the developement in the other areas.
will this 3d thing work with every 3d monitor, regardless of the graphix card?

bongodriver 09-18-2011 01:56 PM

Monitor must have a 120hz refresh rate.....standard monitors are 60hz, and the gfx card must support 3d.....as far as I am aware.

Viking 09-18-2011 02:16 PM

Thanks Luthier!
Game runs OK now so you can hold the updates. No more needed!

Regards

Viking

louisv 09-18-2011 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 337419)
Dude, what are you going on about..?

This was a Beta being tested Yes? the Beta being tested produced stutters which i never had before in close action situations..im reporting it along with lots of others

Turn eye candy down....erm...NO i dint before theis Beta and im sure not going to because the Beta that created turns into an official release...Do you know how silly that sounds?

The rest youve posted makes no sense to me in sorry.. il sum it up for you though

before BETA that were were TESTING = no stutters at close quarters at MAX settings

After bETA that we were TESTING = Stutters at close quarters at MAX settings..

But I do hear what your trying to imply...I now need to turn GFX settings down because they have now introduced something that will make the game run worse....then include it in a official release

lol nice one

Wow...no wonder Luthier doesn't post more often.

albx 09-18-2011 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louisv (Post 337737)
Wow...no wonder Luthier doesn't post more often.

means that the only things we should post is how good the game runs? no critics are allowed or what? how can you make something better without pointing at the problems? you never did a beta test right?

robtek 09-18-2011 06:02 PM

It's not about the critics that there was a difference, its about the presentation, i believe.
So stop stirring, albx.

undpilot87 09-18-2011 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek (Post 337898)
It's not about the critics that there was a difference, its about the presentation, i believe.
So stop stirring, albx.

I think the critics of the game do help but that the critics voicing their concerns on these forums could do a better job at voicing them politely. Many of these critics tend to be insulting. Give the team time, I am sure that this game will be unlike anything else out there after the kinks are worked out. Everyone needs to be patient. There are a lot of other things people can be doing that is more productive than trolling these forums.

Ze-Jamz 09-18-2011 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louisv (Post 337737)
Wow...no wonder Luthier doesn't post more often.

Wow, another 'wow' post...Thats really helpful that is..well done

Read between the lines and your see why i posted that... I thankyou

(tut)

louisv 09-18-2011 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albx (Post 337742)
means that the only things we should post is how good the game runs? no critics are allowed or what? how can you make something better without pointing at the problems? you never did a beta test right?

Its not about the message but about the way its delivered.

Rince 09-18-2011 09:55 PM

Thanks for the update, luthier!

To be honest I agree withe party thats not really intrested in the 3-D stuff right now, but maby it`ll come LATER!

I hope also that "Thor" is right in posting that its only a side-product in the development of the game and that you and your team are turning all the attention on the really important issues on the game! `cause all we know is, that those visual candies only last for a short time but they`re not making a game better!

Aloha from Hell!

41Sqn_Stormcrow 09-18-2011 10:26 PM

Could we have at least the pilot in cockpit throwing a shadow? I feel a bit like a sort of vampyre that cannot see himself when looking into a mirror when I look to my wing where the shadow of the cockpit is casted but the cockpit is very apparently empty (no shadow of the pilot).

Jamir 09-19-2011 07:20 AM

Nice to hear that there is some 3D future with IL2:CoD. I have been playing with 3D couple years now and can't go back 2D anymore. This is not just some eye candy we are talking here it's added immersion and i as simmer like to get more immersion when ever it's possible. I think most of the movies it's just a gimmick to be honest but for games/simulations it's another story. Sony's soon to be released HMD+TiR+IL2:CoD in S3D could be a dream come true :D

jcenzano 09-19-2011 08:41 AM

SLI please, SLI

Foo'bar 09-19-2011 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow (Post 338032)
Could we have at least the pilot in cockpit throwing a shadow? I feel a bit like a sort of vampyre that cannot see himself when looking into a mirror when I look to my wing where the shadow of the cockpit is casted but the cockpit is very apparently empty (no shadow of the pilot).

Finally all serious bugs have been fixed so we can talk about such stuff, hehe ;)

KG26_Alpha 09-19-2011 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo'bar (Post 338207)
Finally all serious bugs have been fixed so we can talk about such stuff, hehe ;)

Don't worry we will know when this happens as attention will also be directed to flight and damage model whining/bugs.





.

JG52Krupi 09-19-2011 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha (Post 338230)
Don't worry we will know when this happens as attention will also be directed to flight and damage model whining/bugs.

In all honesty I only have real performance issues close to the ground and sometimes pauses when I hit the fire button but the fm and dm are slowly creeping towards the top of my list, seriously how hard would it be to just look over the fm at least.

Blackdog_kt 09-20-2011 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by csThor (Post 337380)
I see the 3D stuff as a byproduct of the general work (or should I say rework ?) of the graphics engine and less as a project in itself. The way I understand the system the 3D effect is generated by the driver of the GFX card so there is not much the coders need to do (apart from adapting the engine to the general requirements).

As for the rest ... waiting is the keyword here. :cool:

Pretty much the way i see it. If they have a couple of graphics programmers with spare time and can't use them on something else what are they supposed to do, sit in the office doing nothing? :-P

I don't care much about 3D at this point in time, but as long as it's not to the detriment of everything else i don't mind at all, good for them that they are using some spare work-hours on bonus features.

On a side note, i've been out of town and away from the PC for a couple of days, seems some of us missed the moderating red text :-P
Everyone please play nice and stop attacking people simply for not agreeing with you, or offending posts will start to get moved around to the off-topic section. Nothing personal, just keeping the thread tidy and free of inte-user, 1 on 1 arguments
;)

skouras 09-20-2011 07:05 PM

they can bring coffee to Luthier.........:-P

ktodack 09-21-2011 01:18 AM

What Monitor & glasses
 
So for 3D what kind of monitor and glasses will be needed?

Plt Off JRB Meaker 09-21-2011 07:26 AM

I noticed that since the recent Beta patch was applied the British fighters markings have altered and not for the best.

The serial numbers on the Brit fighters are now grey and the tactical markings,ie,squadron markings are now a bright white these are both wrong historically.

I would'nt have brought this to light had the marking colours not been so correct previously,but they were almost perfect,now it seems on this alone the devs have gone backward.

One appreciates this is only a Beta version and that the correct marking colours will be restored on Friday,should we be lucky enough to get the live update.

The correct colours are,all serial numbers in black and majority of tactical markings in a very light grey or off white.

Jamir 09-21-2011 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ktodack (Post 338919)
So for 3D what kind of monitor and glasses will be needed?

Try to find as much information you can, take your time. Worst to Best cap is huge and every tech have their + and -. If you chose wrong you will end up at "it's a gimmick" camp chose right and you will not go back to 2D. I would go DLP projector + 3D vision set at the moment or wait new Sony HMD.

Make sure that TV/monitor/projector that you chose have minimal amount of ghosting, some off it come from glasses but over 95% is from display device. This is number one issue for sure, over time it will start to bother(there are many angry TV set owners for this reason), it will give you headaches, it will make your eyes to fatigue + it just look bad. So look for ghost free.

http://3dvision-blog.com/ this site have many reviews of LCD monitors.

150GCT_Veltro 09-21-2011 09:10 AM

This beta is an important step forward, but do you guys have any news about clouds? I'm not talking about dynamic weather, but properly clouds that are the same from IL2 (placeholders?).

Is there a time line for the sky update?

robtek 09-21-2011 05:06 PM

One thing after the other, i'd say.

Don't put more pressure at the devs, they're working on their own accord, let them fix it right.

TomcatViP 09-21-2011 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 150GCT_Veltro (Post 338985)
This beta is an important step forward, but do you guys have any news about clouds? I'm not talking about dynamic weather, but properly clouds that are the same from IL2 (placeholders?).

Is there a time line for the sky update?

Hummm ... 7 days ? :rolleyes::cool:

heywooood 09-22-2011 03:11 AM

hmmm - same ol' same ol'

Hello Ilya - looks like you have your hands full again...

I have held off purchasing CoD after reading the early reviews and now it looks like a carbon copy of the original Il2's teething pains.

Like that one this sim was rushed, Il2 was too strong for current hardware, patches were needed to dumb it down, some effects had to be removed or reduced, no one was really happy - or rather - each patch angered some and pleased others, until finally the hardware began to catch up and you could begin to unlock and update and make Il2 the way it was supposed to be. This stuff isn't new to anyone who was around when the original was released.

And just like back when, your priorities are never the same as the 'fanbois' priorities. You talk about 3d and they want to know where their Caproni is at already....yikes

This looks identical to that situation, so you have my sincerest sympathy.

I will keep looking in on these boards though - I do plan on buying CoD someday...the screenshots look terrific

robtek 09-22-2011 10:01 AM

You might support the cause NOW and buy a copy, btw it is already tons of fun to play on some servers.

Ze-Jamz 09-22-2011 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heywooood (Post 339350)
hmmm - same ol' same ol'

Hello Ilya - looks like you have your hands full again...

I have held off purchasing CoD after reading the early reviews and now it looks like a carbon copy of the original Il2's teething pains.

Like that one this sim was rushed, Il2 was too strong for current hardware, patches were needed to dumb it down, some effects had to be removed or reduced, no one was really happy - or rather - each patch angered some and pleased others, until finally the hardware began to catch up and you could begin to unlock and update and make Il2 the way it was supposed to be. This stuff isn't new to anyone who was around when the original was released.

And just like back when, your priorities are never the same as the 'fanbois' priorities. You talk about 3d and they want to know where their Caproni is at already....yikes

This looks identical to that situation, so you have my sincerest sympathy.

I will keep looking in on these boards though - I do plan on buying CoD someday...the screenshots look terrific

Im guessing you play Il2 or have played Il2? and have soon forgot about said problems when it was first released because it tuned into a masterpiece?

Be nice if you supported the game now if you intend to play it... as said above game runs fine for most of us..i said 'most' and is enjoyable now even in its current state

ATAG_Snapper 09-22-2011 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heywooood (Post 339350)
hmmm - same ol' same ol'

Hello Ilya - looks like you have your hands full again...

I have held off purchasing CoD after reading the early reviews and now it looks like a carbon copy of the original Il2's teething pains.

Like that one this sim was rushed, Il2 was too strong for current hardware, patches were needed to dumb it down, some effects had to be removed or reduced, no one was really happy - or rather - each patch angered some and pleased others, until finally the hardware began to catch up and you could begin to unlock and update and make Il2 the way it was supposed to be. This stuff isn't new to anyone who was around when the original was released.

And just like back when, your priorities are never the same as the 'fanbois' priorities. You talk about 3d and they want to know where their Caproni is at already....yikes

This looks identical to that situation, so you have my sincerest sympathy.

I will keep looking in on these boards though - I do plan on buying CoD someday...the screenshots look terrific

Yadda, yadda, yadda. Talk is cheap. Buy the game. Join the team and get in on The Big Win. Be a player, not a tire-kicker. "I do plan on....." Yeah, OK. :rolleyes:

Thr0tt 09-23-2011 08:50 PM

The live version of the patch is tentatively scheduled for next Friday the 23rd. Please for the love of all that is holy note the word “tentatively” in the previous sentence.

Frequent_Flyer 09-23-2011 09:12 PM

I hope a release of an official patch, with significant content is released in the very near future. I beleive it would help stimulate on line interest,at present not a very robust following online.

ATAG_Bliss 09-23-2011 09:17 PM

Let's hope for true dedicated server files or some sort of SDK's/manuals. Would help online tremendously.

mazex 09-23-2011 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer (Post 340154)
I hope a release of an official patch, with significant content is released in the very near future. I beleive it would help stimulate on line interest,at present not a very robust following online.

Well, if they really mean that what we got two weeks ago was a beta, then we can not expect the release version to contain more features than the beta (albeit with bugs fixed that where found in the beta) ? Otherwise it was an alpha we got ;)

Mazex

adonys 09-23-2011 10:54 PM

it was always an alpha until now: each "beta" version release we've got was never re-released then as an official release, but was followed up by another version official release (and not only containing fixes, but also new features which were not present in the "beta" release).

which, by the book definition means that all releases we've got are in fact beta ones :)

Frequent_Flyer 09-23-2011 10:57 PM

Based upon the various forums, the majority, myself included beleive the sim in it's present state is a Beta release. I am not certain what your point was?

ingsoc84 09-23-2011 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer (Post 340186)
Based upon the various forums, the majority, myself included beleive the sim in it's present state is a Beta release. I am not certain what your point was?



Agreed..holding off on upgrading my video card until I see what the new releases/patches etc holds..I love the game...its just (still) seems to be early in development.

Blackdog_kt 09-24-2011 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex (Post 340162)
Well, if they really mean that what we got two weeks ago was a beta, then we can not expect the release version to contain more features than the beta (albeit with bugs fixed that where found in the beta) ? Otherwise it was an alpha we got ;)

Mazex

Exactly. If something extra comes along it will probably be some small features or bug corrections that weren't initially mentioned for this patch, but not something radical.

The way it usually goes is:
  1. dev update after an official patch saying what they are working on for the next patch
  2. one or more extra dev updates depending on how long it takes to get a beta ready
  3. beta release and testing
  4. beta bug reporting
  5. correcting beta bugs
  6. official patch release
  7. rinse and repeat

No reason guessing what the patch is going to include, it's mainly what the beta included or was supposed to include (in case of features that needed more work).

Sorry to be a killjoy for some, but let's maintain reasonable expectations to avoid disappointment later on ;)

P.S. SDKs and the like are scheduled for after the main phase of graphics/sound/performance changes are finished, maybe the FM/DM corrections as well, at least that's what Luthier said some time ago.

ingsoc84 09-24-2011 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehawk (Post 340217)
Ugh, your video card isn't running the game at max settings?



Textures at original..forests low..no grass...and some other items at low...it still look nice..however..when I shoot down a bomber and fly through its smoke trail...the fps goes to 12 or so..not good...my system should run this game smoothly....however...as we know..its still being "optimized"..if the patches dont help..I'll sell my card (three months new) and get a gtx 580 with 3 gigs of vram....Zotec makes one..around 540. I dont know whats new on the horizon for Nvidea.

Wolf_Rider 09-24-2011 04:35 AM

scratchy motion and wot happened to the colour??... it looks worse than before, almost as though a cheap mask (tawny coloured veil) has been introduced over the whole thing.
Cockpit shadows seem to appear to be sharper though :)

Snakedoktor 09-24-2011 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ingsoc84 (Post 340264)
Textures at original..forests low..no grass...and some other items at low...it still look nice..however..when I shoot down a bomber and fly through its smoke trail...the fps goes to 12 or so..not good...my system should run this game smoothly....however...as we know..its still being "optimized"..if the patches dont help..I'll sell my card (three months new) and get a gtx 580 with 3 gigs of vram....Zotec makes one..around 540. I dont know whats new on the horizon for Nvidea.

Tbh that seems very low for a 570. i think you must have a bottleneck somewhere else. I run a 570 that is overclocked (not overvolted) and it runs the game sweet on mostly max settings. In all fairness i have to say that i think the game is progressing well, granted it should not have been released as it was or still is but its heading in the right direction.

Blackdog_kt 09-25-2011 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ingsoc84 (Post 340264)
Textures at original..forests low..no grass...and some other items at low...it still look nice..however..when I shoot down a bomber and fly through its smoke trail...the fps goes to 12 or so..not good...my system should run this game smoothly....however...as we know..its still being "optimized"..if the patches dont help..I'll sell my card (three months new) and get a gtx 580 with 3 gigs of vram....Zotec makes one..around 540. I dont know whats new on the horizon for Nvidea.

Keep your card, drop your textures from original to high and you might even be able to bump something else up. I'm running aa Ati 4890 with 1GB of vRAM (that's 1-2 generations back, equivalent to the GTX 28x series nVidia cards) and i don't have to turn off grass, trees, roads or vsync.

Dropping the texture setting is the first thing to do in case you have problems, it gives the biggest performance boost and there's not much difference between original and high, especially if you consider that with the performance gained you can probably enable a couple of other things that make it look better and still be running higher FPS than before. ;)

ingsoc84 09-25-2011 02:05 AM

Thanks all, will give it a try...I cant see where I would have a bottleneck.I Oc'd my cpu to 3.5..thats just a hair above stock 3.3..got plenty of fast ram...and a decent hard drive I believe..if anyone can think of anything else should be doing...that could be creating a bottleneck..let me know please, I'll drop the textures down to high and see how that plays out for a while...thanks again..I agree..the 570 should be enough to run this game with my cpu/ram etc. I mean...heck, what kind of platform was the system originally built on anyway?

Snakedoktor 09-25-2011 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ingsoc84 (Post 340649)
Thanks all, will give it a try...I cant see where I would have a bottleneck.I Oc'd my cpu to 3.5..thats just a hair above stock 3.3..got plenty of fast ram...and a decent hard drive I believe..if anyone can think of anything else should be doing...that could be creating a bottleneck..let me know please, I'll drop the textures down to high and see how that plays out for a while...thanks again..I agree..the 570 should be enough to run this game with my cpu/ram etc. I mean...heck, what kind of platform was the system originally built on anyway?


I would love to help but i know little about amd cpu's as i have always used intel. I looked at the specs on it and i cant see how it would bottleneck, plenty of cache, six cores..... hmm. try what blackdog was saying first otherwise when i had my Q8200 which i had clocked to 3.15ghz it still bottlenecked my 570. granted you have a better cpu, but use afterburner to check how the gpu usage fluctuates; when i had my bottleneck it would fluctuate between 70-99% like crazy, now with my i-5 it's pretty much a smooth line at 99%. good luck

Plt Off JRB Meaker 09-25-2011 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 340279)
scratchy motion and wot happened to the colour??... it looks worse than before, almost as though a cheap mask (tawny coloured veil) has been introduced over the whole thing.
Cockpit shadows seem to appear to be sharper though :)

Blimey mate,can't believe you think the latest patch has made the colour worse!it's superb,I live in the UK and I can assure you the colours are much more authentic now than the 'Telly Tubby' colours that addorned it before.

But hey,all to their own opinion eh?:confused:

Wolf_Rider 09-25-2011 02:06 PM

yes JRB, each to their own opinion... its gone from "Telly Tubby" to "Telly Tubby" with a tawny veil (sepia) over the whole thing (the darkened trees are better though, as well, the new water/ shoreline treatment and with the brownier water, instead of the bright blue)

Corrvan 09-25-2011 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider (Post 340774)
yes JRB, each to their own opinion... its gone from "Telly Tubby" to "Telly Tubby" with a tawny veil (sepia) over the whole thing (the darkened trees are better though, as well, the new water/ shoreline treatment and with the brownier water, instead of the bright blue)

Actually, my colours are much worse too, water used to look like water, now it looks like a blue sheet, and all my fields look like they are on lowest and are just brown and greenish smudges.

=(

ingsoc84 09-25-2011 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snakedoktor (Post 340695)
I would love to help but i know little about amd cpu's as i have always used intel. I looked at the specs on it and i cant see how it would bottleneck, plenty of cache, six cores..... hmm. try what blackdog was saying first otherwise when i had my Q8200 which i had clocked to 3.15ghz it still bottlenecked my 570. granted you have a better cpu, but use afterburner to check how the gpu usage fluctuates; when i had my bottleneck it would fluctuate between 70-99% like crazy, now with my i-5 it's pretty much a smooth line at 99%. good luck


Thanks,,is AFTERBURNER an application? and if so..where do I find it? My other games..Crysis 2 with dx11...Red Orchestra heros of stalingrad..all play with all setting fully maxed beautifully...somehow I think its the game itself..but always like checking apps and seeing if there is a problem..thanks much

ingsoc84 09-25-2011 09:32 PM

Found Afterburner...so its basically an overclocking feature for gpus...butI really dont want to "manually" adjust my gpu settings etc...does this program have a "self tune" for the various cards that adjusts the settings..core clock/shader/voltage/fan to a reasonable boost that is safe for the gpu? Just dont want to fry it..thanks..looks like a cool app...just always a bit skittish on overclocking where I fiddle with all the settings the my asus mobo has a nice tool that allows one to manually adjust everything..OR as I have done..I simply dial in the increased cpu from 3.3 to 3.5, and it adjusts everything itself..which..I prefer..as Im just not knowledgable to do it all manually.

tomandre81 09-25-2011 10:18 PM

Wow!
 
I got to admit I just leaved cliffs of dover alone for over 1 year now. I bought a new computer a few days ago and tried the latest patch (from this forum), and WOW I got say this is getting somewhere. The sound is awesome and the graphics and gameplay have improved a lot! Now it feels like it should.
The only thing remains is when you get close to the ground the micro stuttering is appearing. Its like lagging and "time-warping". But after a while it gets better. It seems like the problems start when you get closer to the ground and the graphic-engine struggels to get all that information fast out without stuttering.
Well keep up the good work. I am enjoying dogfights now high in the air :)

Hunden 09-26-2011 04:45 AM

[QUOTE] I got to admit I just leaved cliffs of dover alone for over 1 year now.

1 whole year huh?

albx 09-26-2011 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehawk (Post 340941)
Well, remember, time is relative, so he was moving VERY slow, so our 4 months (I think?) has been 1 year for him! ;)

is him a sloth? :grin:

Foo'bar 09-26-2011 05:50 AM

Finally I've got my new PC last friday, and I must say that I'm very impressed. You must know that this is the first time ever I was running CloD since my old rig didn't even start the sim. And believe me, it was a real pain since I own two copies of CloD since march...

A.Fokker 09-26-2011 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo'bar (Post 340944)
Finally I've got my new PC last friday, and I must say that I'm very impressed. You must know that this is the first time ever I was running CloD since my old rig didn't even start the sim. And believe me, it was a real pain since I own two copies of CloD since march...

Same situation here, and I don't have the Kneten to buy a new rig in the foreseeable future. :( Ah well, by the time I will be able to play CoD, it will be running bug free surely :D

Skoshi Tiger 09-26-2011 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo'bar (Post 340944)
Finally I've got my new PC last friday, and I must say that I'm very impressed. You must know that this is the first time ever I was running CloD since my old rig didn't even start the sim. And believe me, it was a real pain since I own two copies of CloD since march...

Maybe this deserves it's own thread but have you been following the pro/anti debates that have been going on? How does your initial experience with COD match up to with all the hype/sledging that the sims been received since release?

Cheers!

dflion 09-26-2011 07:31 AM

Good news Foo'bar
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo'bar (Post 340944)
Finally I've got my new PC last friday, and I must say that I'm very impressed. You must know that this is the first time ever I was running CloD since my old rig didn't even start the sim. And believe me, it was a real pain since I own two copies of CloD since march...

I am very glad you have updated your PC Foobar, now you can really see your fantastic steam engines and rolling stock properly in COD. We are all looking forward to see some of your German steam engines and perhaps a few French ones very soon.

DFLion

PS I am still waiting to see the LNER A4?

Foo'bar 09-26-2011 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger (Post 340948)
Maybe this deserves it's own thread but have you been following the pro/anti debates that have been going on? How does your initial experience with COD match up to with all the hype/sledging that the sims been received since release?

Cheers!

Hi Skoshi Tiger,

well, I think my situation is quite different to any other's here around. When I was starting to play the sim for the first time last friday all errors and bugs already have been wiped out so far and I cannot say that playing the sim was a pain. I know that more things will be fixed within the next days (think about the beta patch wich is out since some days).

My feeling is quite good but I know this is what others have been expected since the very first day.

@dflion: perhaps you've been visiting my blog in the last days. I've made a major update to the A4 class and even a new wartime black skin is enroute, more information is available at Foo'blog and Foo'rum. Unfortunately I've no information at the moment about MG's further agenda, so I cannot say when the SNCF (ex prussian G8 ) steamer will face the game.

@A.Fokker: SoW will have a estimated lifetime of about 6 to 7 years ;) so I think you will have a new pc before its end, for shure.

JVM 09-26-2011 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo'bar (Post 340976)
Unfortunately I've no information at the moment about MG's further agenda, so I cannot say when the SNCF (ex prussian G8 ) steamer will face the game.

Maybe when we have a proper network to run them hé hé hé...and some place to put coal into them...so not yet, I do not believe the time is right...Within some months when we may have a look at the map with MG agreement, who knows?

JV

Foo'bar 09-26-2011 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JVM (Post 340988)
Maybe when we have a proper network to run them hé hé hé...and some place to put coal into them...so not yet, I do not believe the time is right...Within some months when we may have a look at the map with MG agreement, who knows?

JV

Jean-Valéry, I think we need to wait for the SDK.

JVM 09-26-2011 12:28 PM

Indeed...you are absolutely right Peter!

Tavingon 09-26-2011 05:15 PM

Call me daft but has there been a patch since the last beta one?

nearmiss 09-26-2011 05:30 PM

No! We are all waiting.

Beta patches do not appear on Steam, only completed patches is my understanding next release is supposed to be a patch release (not beta) so it should be available on steam.

Savas 09-26-2011 06:52 PM

When will the new patch is expected?
Friday 23th - already over.
At least you would say that I'm sorry guys, the patch is delayed. (say this I found myself too) :)

Fjordmonkey 09-26-2011 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savas (Post 341131)
When will the new patch is expected?
Friday 23th - already over.
At least you would say that I'm sorry guys, the patch is delayed. (say this I found myself too) :)

You should read Luthier's post once again...

Frequent_Flyer 09-26-2011 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey (Post 341135)
You should read Luthier's post once again...

It would not take much effort to change the" tenative " date.

Chivas 09-26-2011 07:38 PM

It will stay tenative until they know the date it will be released.

MD_Titus 09-26-2011 07:48 PM

Tentatively pencilled in date, replaced by another tentatively pencilled in date?

JG14_Jagr 09-26-2011 07:50 PM

It will be released when its done. Its BETA for a reason, they need to find issues and fix them. Sometimes when you fix something you find that you broke other things. Patience is a virtue.. just be thankful they didn't give you the "Two Weeks" kiss of death..

Ze-Jamz 09-26-2011 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG14_Jagr (Post 341146)
It will be released when its done. Its BETA for a reason, they need to find issues and fix them. Sometimes when you fix something you find that you broke other things. Patience is a virtue.. just be thankful they didn't give you the "Two Weeks" kiss of death..

Lol..your right there

Frequent_Flyer 09-26-2011 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG14_Jagr (Post 341146)
It will be released when its done. Its BETA for a reason, they need to find issues and fix them. Sometimes when you fix something you find that you broke other things. Patience is a virtue.. just be thankful they didn't give you the "Two Weeks" kiss of death..

The Sim itself is a" Beta "release, as most who own it will atest to.

Virtually no effort is expended to prognosticate another" tenative" target date.However, it does require some managerial input and finess. If you do not assign a drop dead date for any task to be completed ,it is human nature to procrastinate.

Chivas 09-26-2011 09:15 PM

I doubt there is very much procrastination going on the development. What they are doing now will make a huge difference on whether or not they stay in business. Staying in business will mean atleast another ten years of addons and paychecks.

Frequent_Flyer 09-26-2011 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 341163)
I doubt there is very much procrastination going on the development. What they are doing now will make a huge difference on whether or not they stay in business. Staying in business will mean atleast another ten years of addons and paychecks.

With no evidence to the contray, I doubt they are working very efficiently. Staying in business has more to do with getting the " on line " population increased signifiantly. The folks on the fence in the game. Thre is no where near the interest in COD at this stage in the development vs. IL-2 1946.

Yet it is light years ahead in every meaningful measurement, Damage model, landscape, aircraft modeling , cockpit modeling etc.. From what I can discern an enormous amount of "unimplemented" potential. This is a marketing/public relations function.

mazex 09-27-2011 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer (Post 341140)
It would not take much effort to change the" tenative " date.

Agree on that, obviously Ilya has gotten tired of spending 5 minutes to update this forum once a week as there has been so much whining here whatever he says. I think ditching the Friday updates in a situation like this is a bad business move even though I can understand he's tired of the bunch here. There are just a couple of hundred flight sim nerds here that already bought the game so I guess he has made a decision that weekly updates is not worth it. What they need to survive is the customers that don't know what a forum is - and/or don't care...

Chivas 09-27-2011 06:36 AM

The original series game engine had the luxury of being finished and fine tuned before release. The new series is far more complicated in every way and has taken considerably longer to finish than first imagined. I'm sure there is alot of blame to go around, but when your dealing with something this complicated its very easy to have huge delays with even the most efficient developers.

csThor 09-27-2011 06:45 AM

Well, the past record of meeting "tentative dates" is not spectacular, contrary to the flak Maddox Games got for not meeting those dates. I can understand why Ilya doesn't bother with much setting new dates when it all seems to come down to Murphy's Law every single time.

mazex 09-27-2011 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by csThor (Post 341278)
Well, the past record of meeting "tentative dates" is not spectacular, contrary to the flak Maddox Games got for not meeting those dates. I can understand why Ilya doesn't bother with much setting new dates when it all seems to come down to Murphy's Law every single time.

Yes, but working as a manager in the software development business myself I can tell you that very few companies would accept the constant problems with delivery dates that they have. I guess they really should work on their development methodology, focus on core functionality in iterations where done is done and stop gold plating silly details ;) Easy to say "from the other side of the fence" ;)

sorak 09-27-2011 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex (Post 341273)
Agree on that, obviously Ilya has gotten tired of spending 5 minutes to update this forum once a week as there has been so much whining here whatever he says. I think ditching the Friday updates in a situation like this is a bad business move even though I can understand he's tired of the bunch here. There are just a couple of hundred flight sim nerds here that already bought the game so I guess he has made a decision that weekly updates is not worth it. What they need to survive is the customers that don't know what a forum is - and/or don't care...

Ill never understand people that really act like "forum people" can impact their real life. If you are thinking about what people say on this forum other then when your not on it.. something is wrong

Frequent_Flyer 09-27-2011 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex (Post 341273)
Agree on that, obviously Ilya has gotten tired of spending 5 minutes to update this forum once a week as there has been so much whining here whatever he says. I think ditching the Friday updates in a situation like this is a bad business move even though I can understand he's tired of the bunch here. There are just a couple of hundred flight sim nerds here that already bought the game so I guess he has made a decision that weekly updates is not worth it. What they need to survive is the customers that don't know what a forum is - and/or don't care...

How about a "Friday update " thread that is locked. Show some work in progress a paragragh explaining it and off you go.
No exposure to the goofs on the forum with the untreated or undermedicated personality disorders.

Something to counter balance the prevailing negative aura.

Blackdog_kt 09-28-2011 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer (Post 341562)
How about a "Friday update " thread that is locked. Show some work in progress a paragragh explaining it and off you go.
No exposure to the goofs on the forum with the untreated or undermedicated personality disorders.

Something to counter balance the prevailing negative aura.

That's definitely the kind of thing that will happen pretty soon if a minority of clowns doesn't start minding their manners.

This thread has started going downhill too, i'm tired of doing the same people the courtesy of simply moving their posts to the off topic section only for them to see it as a weakness, so i'm cleaning up the last couple of pages by deleting posts altogether (along with ok posts that reference the offending ones, sorry for the "civilian casualties" but the aim is to clear the thread of any off-topic influences).

Nothing personal, i'm just saying this forum will be maintained in a readable state whether some people want it or not: the majority wants it and it's not within their powers to completely disrupt what the majority wants.

Honorable mentions:

JUICE consider yourself on the ban-wagon.

Gerbil, please tone it down a notch or two.

The rest of the regular folks, carry on as usual ;)

philip.ed 09-28-2011 08:50 PM

Blackdog, can you extend on what you deem manners? For example, a customer who is unsatisfied with the product, or the patch, may use such a thread as this to express their disapointment. Perhaps they appear rude? Will these posts be removed? And, similarly, are posts from users saying they are unhappy with the 3-D development, in this case,(when there are apparently more tangible issues which need improvement) deemed un-tasteful?

I can't stand the arguments which seem to underpin, and then take-over, every update topic, but then again, one can't help but think it's all part of the natural process of game-development. Some will be satisfied with spit-girl, for example, others may not be.

I think you're doing a great job moderating this board (I don't envy you at all) but I can hold my hands up and say that sometimes, before hitting the submit button, I worry whether I am wasting my time. There will always be a group of people who will react vehemetly to certain peoples' postings, whether it's needlessly destructive, or positively critical.

Sorry, I'm thinking aloud! :-P

Frequent_Flyer 09-28-2011 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt (Post 341812)
That's definitely the kind of thing that will happen pretty soon if a minority of clowns doesn't start minding their manners.

This thread has started going downhill too, i'm tired of doing the same people the courtesy of simply moving their posts to the off topic section only for them to see it as a weakness, so i'm cleaning up the last couple of pages by deleting posts altogether (along with ok posts that reference the offending ones, sorry for the "civilian casualties" but the aim is to clear the thread of any off-topic influences).

Nothing personal, i'm just saying this forum will be maintained in a readable state whether some people want it or not: the majority wants it and it's not within their powers to completely disrupt what the majority wants.

Honorable mentions:

JUICE consider yourself on the ban-wagon.

Gerbil, please tone it down a notch or two.

The rest of the regular folks, carry on as usual ;)

I completly understand, thanks for the folow up explanation.

Gerbil Maximus 09-28-2011 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt (Post 341812)

Gerbil, please tone it down a notch or two.

My answer is simply that I'll tell the truth as i see it.
I wont swear and if i have im sorry but i will speak my mind.
I'm Sorry if you dont like it, I'm not saying this to be confrontational of course or to upset the momentum of the thread. I will try to maybe not sound as forceful as i maybe did in my last post.

MD_Titus 09-29-2011 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerbil Maximus (Post 341851)
My answer is simply that I'll tell the truth as i see it.
I wont swear and if i have im sorry but i will speak my mind.
I'm Sorry if you dont like it, I'm not saying this to be confrontational of course or to upset the momentum of the thread. I will try to maybe not sound as forceful as i maybe did in my last post.

start an alternative friday update thread to speak your mind in?

mazex 09-29-2011 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer (Post 341562)
How about a "Friday update " thread that is locked. Show some work in progress a paragragh explaining it and off you go.
No exposure to the goofs on the forum with the untreated or undermedicated personality disorders.

Something to counter balance the prevailing negative aura.

Even though it's going against the fundamental principles of a forum I think that would be better than what we have today. As Ilya doesn't have time to read the 30 page thread that every sentence he writes results in, I guess the best thing would be a locked developer update thread like the old one Oleg had, with no stickied comment thread for each update that Ilya will not have time to read anyway (or he should go with train to work like me where tapatalk on my Android phone is actually better than reading the forum in a regular browser) . Then keep heavily moderated bug reporting thread for each beta/release with detailed instructions about how to report a bug or it will be deleted...

Mazex

Ali Fish 09-29-2011 10:16 PM

i would like to see a friday update thread that is locked. Actually i would like to see all information divulged by any developer Locked and treated as the be all and end of all that is to be said on the matter.

The fact of the matter is that what we discuss thereafter is upsetting for some. frustrating for others, pleasing for many all be it temporarily. just stop it and treat the information with the respect it deserves.

locked threads allow the information to be contained and archived and understood by ourselves more efficiently not to mention delivered in a more professional manner.

Frequent_Flyer 09-29-2011 10:34 PM

A " locked Thread " serves two functions , it may encourage more input from the dev. team and it is a time saver for the folks who want to hop on the forum and quickly check for updates and carry on.

ATAG_Snapper 09-29-2011 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frequent_Flyer (Post 342194)
A " locked Thread " serves two functions , it may encourage more input from the dev. team and it is a time saver for the folks who want to hop on the forum and quickly check for updates and carry on.

+1

Well put.

MIRGERVIN 09-30-2011 12:27 AM

can someone tell me when we will be getting this so called patch????????????????????????????

CWMV 09-30-2011 01:49 AM

Nope.

Chivas 09-30-2011 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIRGERVIN (Post 342215)
can someone tell me when we will be getting this so called patch????????????????????????????

They haven't tentatively scheduled a "so called patch", but are working on a patch with much improved sound and terrain palette, which may come out soon.

Foo'bar 09-30-2011 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIRGERVIN (Post 342215)
can someone tell me when we will be getting this so called patch????????????????????????????

After you'll use less question marks. :rolleyes:

Thr0tt 09-30-2011 08:39 AM

Friday Development Update, maybe drop the Friday so the perception of regular updates is removed, that could save some frustration.

Ze-Jamz 09-30-2011 08:41 AM

Dont worry, patch will be out today...be sure

Pudfark 09-30-2011 05:54 PM

I use to think of it as a patch.....?
Now?
More like a blindfold.....:rolleyes:

JG5_emil 09-30-2011 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 342304)
Dont worry, patch will be out today...be sure

When you say today do you mean today in the future?

Ze-Jamz 09-30-2011 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG5_emil (Post 342520)
When you say today do you mean today in the future?

Yea exactly that :)

Il link to this post when it finally comes out

snwkill 09-30-2011 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 342527)
Yea exactly that :)

Il link to this post when it finally comes out

Tic Toc

Ze-Jamz 09-30-2011 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snwkill (Post 342532)
Tic Toc

Lol..forget the clock mate, your better of getting a calendar :cool:


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.