Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - How was Team Daidalos started/created?

Page 2 of 3

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)

- - How was Team Daidalos started/created? (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=34764)

Nil	10-06-2012 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 467515)

like i already said ( not once) i proud to be communicate with you guys... and i hope that i will become a worthy member of your Dteam ))))

Many thanks for your wonderful work on this plane, that is great work! thanks to bringing to life the SB.

Sita	10-06-2012 10:32 PM

i've do what i can ...
and not only i ... i work not in loneliness ... SB we made with my friend Zlovred ...

but it only half (or may be less then half of work) rest of part of work was do Great Guys from DT ...

to us DT was like inspirer ... and Great Supporter ...

we are very grateful to they

Fighterace

10-06-2012 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkubani (Post 467510)

DT has started as a mix (about 50:50) of former 1C/MG third party modellers and AAA modders that wanted to continue working on IL-2 in a different way than it has been established on AAA. Simple as that. We did not want to go against the owner of the game but offered a direct non-commercial cooperation to him. We have agreed to the limitations that were linked to such agreement. Basically, we need to be consistent and legal in the development of our patches.

Patch 4.09 content has been produced completely by DT, and just compiled by 1C. Everything after 4.09 has been done by DT only including compilation and release.

Just one note: Nobody in DT is playing "gods", but we do get irritated when we are publicly requested / pushed to do things we have stated we can not and will not do for reasons described above. DT's objectives has been clearly stated back in 2009. And we have proposed external cooperation right in the interview. You can read the public interview here: http://www.simhq.com/_air13/air_420a.html

BTW, Sita you have been one of those who has cooperated with us directly and now your fantastic cockpit of SB-2 is coded into 4.12. Thank you.

I hope I have answered your question.

Just the answer I was looking for. Thanks :)

IceFire

10-07-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sita (Post 467546)

Definitely a great job and a great service both of you provided in putting together the content you have. Keep it up! :cool:

Bearcat

10-09-2012 12:54 AM

I remember well those early days and how uncertain things were for so may. From where I sit it seems that a lot of the voices of reason within the AAA group moved to TD and HSFX..

I am just very grateful that they are here and that they were able to work with Oleg & 1C.

trashcanman

10-15-2012 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkubani (Post 467510)

Is there any chance of us lowly plebs seeing that agreement?
I for one would be interested in the terms of reference with which you are not playing god and with clayless feet ;)

FC99	10-16-2012 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkubani (Post 467510)

DT has started as a mix (about 50:50) of former 1C/MG third party modellers and AAA modders that wanted to continue working on IL-2 in a different way than it has been established on AAA.

Just a little correction.Expression "AAA modders" should not be taken literally , some of the DT founding members were just a regular members of that forum but at the same time they were members of many other forums so you could equally say "UBI modders" , "CWOS modders" or whatever. Closest to the truth would be to say that some of the DT members were involved in modding but without particular affiliation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by trashcanman (Post 469802)

Is there any chance of us lowly plebs seeing that agreement?
I for one would be interested in the terms of reference with which you are not playing god and with clayless feet ;)

You can't see it, business' contracts are not public matter.

CWMV	10-17-2012 03:19 AM

They are doing a pretty poor job giving it all away for free.

Arl5555en

10-17-2012 08:40 AM

Thank you that breathed life in to the SB
http://www.rdox.info/01.jpg http://www.rdox.info/02.jpg http://www.rdox.info/8.jpg http://www.rdox.info/9.jpg

trashcanman

10-18-2012 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FC99 (Post 469999)

You can't see it, business' contracts are not public matter.

Now I am confused. Does TD have a contract with 1C or an Agreement?

In order to have a contract with another party, TD must be a registered business, charity, other legal entity or be an individual acting in proxy for TD :confused:

To my simple mind, that seems like a bunch of very complex options with various legal connotations that could leave individuals open to personal liabilities from disgruntled customers. (I am merely stating an opinion here, please do not use this as a excuse to delete another of my posts!)

On the other hand, an Agreement between a collection of well meaning individuals (such as TD) and a corporate body (such as 1C) could easily be shared in the public domain (such as every EULA one has ever clicked "Agreed" to) without any problem.

TD has a worrying habit, in my personal opinion, of aggressively attacking anyone who dares to question their intellectual supremacy and an ongoing refusal to explain the data they use, their interpretation of it and the justification of the changes they make based upon it.

Other than that they are awesome :)

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Page 2 of 3

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page