Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - N680GTX has just made my il2cod "flyable"

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)

- - N680GTX has just made my il2cod "flyable" (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=30781)

Quote:

Originally Posted by zapatista (Post 403620)

the RoF are canned and scripted FM's, with their current game core it wont get any better then what it is now, and/or has been in the past

This is so irrelevant. You have missed the word "biased" in post of Winger. If he thinks that RoF is biased towards Allies, then I wonder what he will think when La5s will be appearing in IL2 sequels.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MajorBoris (Post 403622)

Hey highness, I noticed you had the model detail set to high, try original, its probably the last setting you want move down. You should notice the cockpits and planes are improved with little performance hit:)

Let us know if its better for you;)

thanks for the advice, will try

Quote:

Originally Posted by hc_wolf (Post 403619)

I have a avg 85 fps on my rig. never drops below 58.

If i put vsync on i get 60fps and never below 58.

I run same full settings. power is in the i7

damn! im gonna get the i7 i think

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ (Post 403610)

Oh, just wait for La5s in sequels. :cool:

Ill just fly them then:P Just like i started to fly allied porsches in ROF. No matter wich side. Its just stupid to favor one side over the other if i am a developer. Sadly seems to be common in Flightsims.

Winger

Quote:

Originally Posted by hc_wolf (Post 403619)

I have a avg 85 fps on my rig. never drops below 58.

If i put vsync on i get 60fps and never below 58.

I run same full settings. power is in the i7

I can not agree here. I had a I7 2700 before, when i still had my GTX 480 running and i have it now. The big performanceboost came from the graphicscard with no doubt.

Winger

Quote:

Originally Posted by zapatista (Post 403620)

the RoF are canned and scripted FM's, with their current game core it wont get any better then what it is now, and/or has been in the past

OT:

And what do you expect? FM based on extensive flight tests?

There is so little info about how those aieplanes flew. Modern flight test data comes from the 50s or 60s. And I mean "modern". In WWII era the did have flight test but mainly based on the main parameters and never combined as it was done later when E-M diagrams were created.

In wwI era they were just trying to fix the biggest engine possible in a given airframe or an airframe around a given engine.

I think the 777 guys have done a hell of a job, taking into consideration the amount of factual information available.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ (Post 403610)

Oh, just wait for La5s in sequels. :cool:

Bf109G6 eats La5s for breakfast :cool:

Quote:

Originally Posted by MajorBoris (Post 403622)

With the "texture quality" being the most hitting (besides SSAO/Epilepsy/AA), right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by highness (Post 403601)

just my 2cents:

i have been using a 295GTX for the last 2-3 years, and today i have decided to upgrade and picked up an MSI N680GTX

so, with the current version of il2cod and the 295GTX i was having an average of 7-15fps and annoying stutters with the following settings (see the screen below), flying or doing anything in the sim was just impossible and with lower settings it was just looking ugly:

http://i.imgur.com/YEgjk.jpg

now, with the N680GTX and the same settings as above, i am having an average of 19-38 FPS! and i just couldn't believe how nearly smoothly it was running, the performance improvement was really really MAJOR here! it became nearly stutterless and, now definitely PLAYABLE/FLYABLE...

so far, i no longer need to wait for the new patch as i got my il2cod "fixed" somehow.. :grin:

my other system specs are: i5 (oclocked to 4ghz), 8gb ram, win7 64bit

Congratulations on the new card but if I may say so you were your own worst enemy with those settings on the old card. Such high settings (with the current graphics software) for Forest plus Grass and SSAO 'on' were always going to drag that card down. Also if you were near buildings, Buildings Detail and Buildings amount set so high could have been a problem.

Even with your new card your only just getting playable fps. Try turning some of those down and watch it leap forward. Big hitters are SSAO and Grass (do we need waving oversized grass?), I'd play with those to start with. Get up to 40-60fps and its a new world.

btw Anti-Aliasing x16 does nothing at the moment. It seems only x2 is working at the moment. You could try turning it off and setting it in your graphics card manager instead.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hc_wolf (Post 403619)

I have a avg 85 fps on my rig. never drops below 58.

If i put vsync on i get 60fps and never below 58.

I run same full settings. power is in the i7

Do you have Hyperthreading disabled playing CloD?

How does CloD look on your 40" (which resolution btw?). Any problems with reading text on that screen when using as a pc screen?

Thank you :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ (Post 403625)

can you try this once more, but this time in english ?