Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   4.12 development update discussion and feedback (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=31734)

_1SMV_Gitano 07-19-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lagarto (Post 446247)
By the way, wasn't Kittyhawk MK IA (P-40E) fitted with underwing bomb racks? The current model doesn't have them.

Many wartime pictures suggest that the use of small size bombs under the wings was widespread from the P-40F onwards. On the other hand, some references suggest that small bombs were used also by P-40s in the Phlippines campaign (1941) but it's not clear what version carried them as there were both P40B/Cs and P-40Es operating together (source: Bloody Shambles vol. 1 by C. Shores)

Fighterace 07-19-2012 11:11 AM

Will the new P-40 models have an improved DM?

Macwan 07-19-2012 09:15 PM

Yes, they will. At least the 3D, texture and collision boxes are much more detailled.

Cheers !

Macwan.

ElAurens 07-19-2012 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _1SMV_Gitano (Post 446252)
Many wartime pictures suggest that the use of small size bombs under the wings was widespread from the P-40F onwards. On the other hand, some references suggest that small bombs were used also by P-40s in the Phlippines campaign (1941) but it's not clear what version carried them as there were both P40B/Cs and P-40Es operating together (source: Bloody Shambles vol. 1 by C. Shores)

14th. Air Force P 40s were often armed with the bazooka type rocket launcher, as seen on the P47 in IL2.

EJGr.Ost_Caspar 07-19-2012 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IceFire (Post 446209)
The P-40 cockpit isn't too bad... yes the Bf109 one is pretty old and fairly awful in comparison.

I tend to disagree. While Bf109 do have awful texturing (old style), the 3D shape of the P-40 cockpits, especially the canopy frames, is really wrong.
So in summary, P-40 cockpits are wrong, while Bf109 ones are only ugly.

Lagarto 07-20-2012 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 446580)
So in summary, P-40 cockpits are wrong, while Bf109 ones are only ugly.

Many people won't notice when something is wrong, for lack of expertise, but they will surely notice when something is ugly :)

IceFire 07-20-2012 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar (Post 446580)
I tend to disagree. While Bf109 do have awful texturing (old style), the 3D shape of the P-40 cockpits, especially the canopy frames, is really wrong.
So in summary, P-40 cockpits are wrong, while Bf109 ones are only ugly.

That's quotable :) Both could use some tlc but super happy about the P-40 in general!

Phil_K 07-20-2012 07:14 PM

P-40 cockpit frames are wrong AND ugly.

Fighterace 07-21-2012 01:00 AM

So, no more one shot knocking out the engine or damaging all control surfaces

Macwan 07-21-2012 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fighterace (Post 447104)
So, no more one shot knocking out the engine or damaging all control surfaces

Normally, no more. The following parts are separated : engine body (cylinders), radiator, carburator, oil tank, fuel tanks (x3), control cables (x4).
To my opinion, the radiator and wings fuel tanks are the less protected parts.
The other parts are pretty secured and well protected, actually.

Macwan.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.