Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Update, January 27, 2012 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=29368)

Tickl3 01-27-2012 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carguy_ (Post 385225)
Dropped it? Nope. Not true.

Troll post reported.

Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?

Baron 01-27-2012 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luftrofl (Post 384977)
I'm using a 560ti. Spends most of its time running Battlefield 3 maxed out just fine. .



LoL, no u dont.

klem 01-27-2012 04:09 PM

226 posts in 10 hours, most of it OT drivel.

How are we to find sensible questions and answers that are OT?

For god's sake lock the thread, BlackSix isn't likely to post anything more here that wouldn't be buried within two hours.

BaronBonBaron 01-27-2012 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kendo65 (Post 384979)
Thanks Blacksix and Luthier for the update.

A word to those finding fault, I'm not normally that bothered about people expressing their opinions, but after what is a very decent update with an in-depth report from Luthier on the difficulties they are encountering I'm amazed to find people throwing it back in his face. All you armchair software development experts who think you personally know better...! Take a look at yourselves.

+3!

Urufu_Shinjiro 01-27-2012 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tickl3 (Post 385230)
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?

Hmm, I guess I missed it the first read through, but going back and looking again I think I do see where the project is dropped, it says it right here:

Quote:

So our general status report is very simple. Everyone is working very hard doing the same thing they were doing a month or a year ago. Graphical programmers are working on graphics. Network programmers are combing through the network code. Plane modelers are building 3D models of aircraft. No one stopped. Nothing was abandoned. On the contrary, the team continues to grow.
Oh...wait... :roll:

bongodriver 01-27-2012 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tickl3 (Post 385230)
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?

Yes that's what a forum is for, so you expressed your oppinion and others expressed their oppinion on it, this just seems to turn people like you into bile spitting looneys who take things a step too far.

BigC208 01-27-2012 04:20 PM

B6, Thanks for the update. Keep us in the loop. When it's done it's done.

phoenix1963 01-27-2012 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSix (Post 384928)
It’s our pleasure to continue our weekly updates in 2012!
....
So we address each issue at its own speed. Some bugs can be fixed very quickly, and they are. We can update a cockpit lever animation or fix a type in a matter of minutes. On the other hand, locating a memory leak can take many long months of dedicated work by some extremely qualified programmers. All bugs are not created equal.
[/FONT][/B]

I sympathise. It once took me 6 months to find a stack overflow that was writing over data belonging to another processor.

Some of the people here simply don't understand.

Looking forward to the patch.

56RAF_phoenix

J.Reb 01-27-2012 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 385202)
Most of us feel we actually got a bit less than we paid for (this happens all the time), but only a very small minority wan't to punish 1C for the rest of their lives, Bewolf was spot-on with 'entitlement junkies'.

The only entitlement people want is for the game to work correctly. And it is due to them because they bought the game in good faith with money they worked for. What part of this don't you understand?


Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 385202)
Thousands? I doubt it, secret agenda? more like it but the secret part isn't so secret, it's clear they wan't COD and probably 1C to fail, why? god only knows.

Pretty stupid thing to say. I have bought everything Oleg has come out with, and wound up satisfied because he released necessary patches. I hope CoD will wind up the same.

JG53Frankyboy 01-27-2012 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urufu_Shinjiro (Post 385244)
Hmm, I guess I missed it the first read through, but going back and looking again I think I do see where the project is dropped, it says it right here:



Oh...wait... :roll:

according to Luthier ( a post in the past) they abondened the Battle of Britain scenario. No totaly new planes/cockpits, no ships for it.
I hope the RAF and RA planes wil get their FM and CEM corrections (the Lw planes are needed in thevBoM scenario ;) ).
From Engine and GUI improvements both scenarios will get benefit - at least that is my understanding of 1C's development plan.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.