Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Page 17 of 18

« First

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=132)

- - Over G Fighter (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=11556)

phlux

12-18-2009 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raw Kryptonite (Post 129425)

Good games guys!
Heard the term "flaming fire" on Conan tonight. You know how bad that stuff is. :shock: See, I'm not crazy.

Yessir good games to you, and yeah that "flaming" fire is hottest and worst kind:cool:

We'll have to do that again soon.

Vulcan607

12-18-2009 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Araqiel (Post 129482)

Yeah, plus a Vulcan, a Nimrod and thirteen Victors, and a 4,000-mile map to fly them on, right? :grin:

no what ever gave you that idea:grin:
was 2 vulcans

Vulcan607

12-18-2009 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FOZ_1983 (Post 129539)

Air to air refueling could work on the maps we already have. If i play arena mode online then its impossible to fly from your base to the enemies base and back in an F14 without drop tanks and your afterburners on all the way. Without burners then its fine. Going for the realism which i love and respect. Its upto me to manage my fuel consumption accordingly and check everything is ok. If i have drop tanks and i need to be more manouvrable - jetison them, no matter how much fuel is in them.

i just think that if you need fuel but not ammo it would be good to have a TAT circling so that you have the option to stay airbourne, also would need skill so as not to break probe/drouge. Tactial it would mean you dont have to land and take off again to react if your low on fuel.

P.S. cheers for that game.

Raw Kryptonite

12-18-2009 04:25 PM

If we could have had a 2nd map, it might have been fun to have "neutral" airborne refueling like the current map has the central base. You could shoot it down, but you'd be shooting yourself in the foot also to do without it.

Some canyons and land features to hide movement would be nice, like that map with the trains you take out.

Vulcan607

12-18-2009 05:14 PM

how about one of the tripple nipple tankers.
love to see formation refueling.

The M00ps

12-18-2009 05:40 PM

*heh-heh heh-heh, he said "triple nipple"

Yes, lotsa fun last night. It was nice to dust the ol' Tomcat off again. She still handles like always, ie. a school bus.

I could make this a regular occurrance, at least until Julember rolls around.;)

FOZ_1983

12-18-2009 06:05 PM

If anyone is online tonight, i'll play some over-g.

played a couple of games of arena earlier with vulcan, was fun.

Araqiel

12-18-2009 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 129588)

no what ever gave you that idea:grin:
was 2 vulcans

Well, sure, but if we're counting airborne reserves/ ones forced to turn back then there were two Nimrods as well; I'm just including those that actually flew their intended flight plans.

Vulcan607

12-18-2009 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Araqiel (Post 129648)

Well, sure, but if we're counting airborne reserves/ ones forced to turn back then there were two Nimrods as well; I'm just including those that actually flew their intended flight plans.

Buggins

12-31-2009 01:19 AM

Taito have hinted to me in an email that a sequel may be in the works. Also, it has been reported that a magazine listed "World Air Force'' by Taito as an upcoming 360 game for 2010. Fingers crossed..

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Page 17 of 18

« First

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page